Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] gdb overwrites binutils
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:16:14AM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > (switching the list to fink-devel) > ... > > > After further small fixes, what I get in detail (on 10.5 / intel) > for the tests (summary was is my last commit msg, to try getting it > earlier to you...) is : > > 1) on 32 bit fink : >> Test Run By root on Sat Apr 17 02:08:13 2010 >> Native configuration is i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 >> >> === binutils tests === >> >> Schedule of variations: >>unix >> >> Running target unix >> Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file >> for target. >> Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for >> target. >> Using /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/ar.exp ... >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/arm/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/bfin/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/dlltool.exp ... >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/hppa/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/m68k/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/nm.exp ... >> Version /sw32/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/nm-new >> 2.20.1.20100303 >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/objcopy.exp ... >> Version /sw32/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/objcopy >> 2.20.1.20100303 >> FAIL: objcopy (simple copy) >> FAIL: strip >> FAIL: strip with saving a symbol >> FAIL: run objcopy of executable >> FAIL: run stripped executable >> FAIL: run stripped executable with saving a symbol >> ERROR: /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/copytest.s: assembly failed >> FAIL: copy with setting section flags 3 >> ERROR: /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/localize-hidden-2.s: assembly failed >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/objdump.exp ... >> Version /sw32/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/objdump >> 2.20.1.20100303 >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/readelf.exp ... >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/size.exp ... >> Version /sw32/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/size >> 2.20.1.20100303 >> FAIL: size (no arguments) >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/vax/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> binutils-all/windres/windres.exp ... >> >> === binutils Summary === >> >> # of expected passes 26 >> # of unexpected failures 8 >> # of expected failures 1 >> # of unresolved testcases2 >> # of unsupported tests 1 > > 2) on 64bit fink : >> Test Run By root on Sat Apr 17 02:07:58 2010 >> Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0 >> >> === binutils tests === >> >> Schedule of variations: >>unix >> >> Running target unix >> Using /sw64/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description >> file for target. >> Using /sw64/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file >> for target. >> Using /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ >> config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. >> Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ >> testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp ... >> FAIL: ar symbol table >> FAIL: ar thin archive >> FAIL: ar thin archive with nested archive >> Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ >> testsuite/binutils-all/arm/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ >> testsuite/binutils-all/bfin/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ >> testsuite/binutils-all/dlltool.exp ... >> Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ >> testsuite/binutils-all/hppa/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ >> testsuite/binutils-all/m68k/objdump.exp ... >> Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ >> testsuite/binutils-all/nm.exp ... >> Version /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/nm-new >> 2.20.1.20100303 >> FAIL: nm (no arguments) >> FAIL: nm -g >> FAIL: nm -P >> Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ >> testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp
Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] gdb overwrites binutils
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:16:14AM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > (switching the list to fink-devel) > > On 17 Apr 2010, at 00:06, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> Try the updated binutils packaging that I posted on fink tracking... >> >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2988592&group_id=17203&atid=414256 > > I'm just running one myself > I still see problems in the testsuite, including for obldump. > There was a BuildConflict with dejagnu, which I removed_ > but maybe dejagnu has bad side-effects ? (not sure it is up-to-date > either..) > > > I'm now going to update my gcc45 info file to your latest version, and > relaunch the > build on 32bit and 64bit, both with binutils installed, just to check > there are no > other difficulties there. JF, I was testing a bit more empirically. The objdump from my updated binutils 2.20.1-1 packaging allows the plugin support to build on the currently posted gcc45 packaging. A quick test under the 64-bit kernel with x86_64 fink shows... [MacPro:~] howarth% gcc-4 -O3 -c himenoBMTxpa.c [MacPro:~] howarth% objdump -T himenoBMTxpa.o himenoBMTxpa.o: file format mach-o-le DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE: l 0e SECT 01 .text _jacobi.clone.1 3890 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC3 3893 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC4 3896 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC5 3898 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC6 389a l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC7 389c l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC8 389e l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC9 38a0 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC10 38a2 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC11 38a5 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC12 38a8 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC13 38c3 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC15 38d1 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC16 38eb l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC17 38ff l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC18 3915 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC19 392b l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC20 3943 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC21 3950 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC22 3958 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC23 397a l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC24 3998 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC29 39c0 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC30 39e8 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC33 3a08 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC35 3a38 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC36 3a60 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC37 3a82 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC38 3a95 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC39 3ab2 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC40 3ac0 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC41 3a60 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC37 3a82 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC38 3a95 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC39 3ab2 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC40 3ac0 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC41 3ae0 l 0e SECT 02 .cstring LC43 3ea0 l 0e SECT 04 .bss _base_sec.2330 3e90 l 0e SECT 04 .bss _base_usec.2331 3b70 l 0e SECT 07 .eh_frame EH_frame1 2ab0 g 0f SECT 01 .text _clearMat 0d30 g 0f SECT 01 .text _fflop 2de0 g 0f SECT 01 .text _jacobi 0f10 g 0f SECT 01 .text _main 2b00 g 0f SECT 01 .text _mat_set 2c60 g 0f SECT 01 .text _mat_set_init 0d60 g 0f SECT 01 .text _mflops 2a60 g 0f SECT 01 .text _newMat 3b1c g 0f SECT 03 .data _omega 3810 g 0f SECT 01 .text _second 0d80 g 0f SECT 01 .text _set_param 0018 01 UND00 0400 _a 0018 01 UND00 0400 _b 0018 01 UND00 0400 _bnd 0018 01 UND00 0400 _c g 01 UND00 _exit g 01 UND00 _free g 01 UND00 _gettimeofday g 01 UND00 _malloc 0018 01 UND00 0400 _p g 01 UND00 _printf g 01 UND00 _putchar g 01 UND00 _puts g 01 UND00 _scanf g 01 UND00 _strcpy 0018 01 UND00 0400 _wrk1 0018 01 UND00 0400 _wrk2 Frankly, I can imagine a number of r
Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] gdb overwrites binutils
(switching the list to fink-devel) On 17 Apr 2010, at 00:06, Jack Howarth wrote: > Try the updated binutils packaging that I posted on fink tracking... > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2988592&group_id=17203&atid=414256 I'm just running one myself I still see problems in the testsuite, including for obldump. There was a BuildConflict with dejagnu, which I removed_ but maybe dejagnu has bad side-effects ? (not sure it is up-to-date either..) Realise this mail won't get out before tomorrow (have to look at my postfix configuration and my router..) thus putting my files in my exp dir _ so you can see them now. After further small fixes, what I get in detail (on 10.5 / intel) for the tests (summary was is my last commit msg, to try getting it earlier to you...) is : 1) on 32 bit fink : > Test Run By root on Sat Apr 17 02:08:13 2010 > Native configuration is i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 > > === binutils tests === > > Schedule of variations: >unix > > Running target unix > Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description > file for target. > Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file > for target. > Using /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/ar.exp ... > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/arm/objdump.exp ... > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/bfin/objdump.exp ... > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/dlltool.exp ... > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/hppa/objdump.exp ... > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/m68k/objdump.exp ... > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/nm.exp ... > Version /sw32/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/nm-new > 2.20.1.20100303 > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/objcopy.exp ... > Version /sw32/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/objcopy > 2.20.1.20100303 > FAIL: objcopy (simple copy) > FAIL: strip > FAIL: strip with saving a symbol > FAIL: run objcopy of executable > FAIL: run stripped executable > FAIL: run stripped executable with saving a symbol > ERROR: /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/copytest.s: assembly failed > FAIL: copy with setting section flags 3 > ERROR: /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/localize-hidden-2.s: assembly failed > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/objdump.exp ... > Version /sw32/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/objdump > 2.20.1.20100303 > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/readelf.exp ... > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/size.exp ... > Version /sw32/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/darwin_objdir/binutils/size > 2.20.1.20100303 > FAIL: size (no arguments) > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/vax/objdump.exp ... > Running /sw/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > binutils-all/windres/windres.exp ... > > === binutils Summary === > > # of expected passes 26 > # of unexpected failures 8 > # of expected failures1 > # of unresolved testcases 2 > # of unsupported tests1 2) on 64bit fink : > Test Run By root on Sat Apr 17 02:07:58 2010 > Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0 > > === binutils tests === > > Schedule of variations: >unix > > Running target unix > Using /sw64/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description > file for target. > Using /sw64/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file > for target. > Using /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/testsuite/ > config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. > Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ > testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp ... > FAIL: ar symbol table > FAIL: ar thin archive > FAIL: ar thin archive with nested archive > Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ > testsuite/binutils-all/arm/objdump.exp ... > Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ > testsuite/binutils-all/bfin/objdump.exp ... > Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ > testsuite/binutils-all/dlltool.exp ... > Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/binutils-2.20.1/binutils/ > testsuite/binutils-all/hppa/objdump.exp ... > Running /sw64/bld/binutils-2.20.1-3/bin
