Re: [Fink-devel] Validator complains about old cruft
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/14/11 3:55 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:37:51 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Can we > please get rid of the >> >> "Error: use of PatchFile requires declaring a BuildDepends on >> fink (>= 0.24.12) or higher" >> >> complaint in the validator? This should have been EOL'ed with >> 10.4, probably even with 10.3, because older versions of fink >> wouldn't run anyway, much less be able to build packages. The >> Fink-0.8.1 installer for MacOSX 10.4 contained fink-0.24.23. > > Makes sense to me. I'll remove it unless someone objects in the > next few days (or beats me to it:) > > dan > > -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org > > > fink-0.31.2 contains this change. - -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6A1LYACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/CkACfWn0UAmk2Z872GI9ns2zIYGye 1pUAnipUNoatuPkhqf1mZmuDlSH5pWAC =TP4+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Validator complains about old cruft
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:37:51 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: Can we please get rid of the > > "Error: use of PatchFile requires declaring a BuildDepends on fink > (>= 0.24.12) or higher" > > complaint in the validator? This should have been EOL'ed with 10.4, > probably even with 10.3, because older versions of fink wouldn't run > anyway, much less be able to build packages. The Fink-0.8.1 installer > for MacOSX 10.4 contained fink-0.24.23. Makes sense to me. I'll remove it unless someone objects in the next few days (or beats me to it:) dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Validator complains about old cruft
Can we please get rid of the "Error: use of PatchFile requires declaring a BuildDepends on fink (>= 0.24.12) or higher" complaint in the validator? This should have been EOL'ed with 10.4, probably even with 10.3, because older versions of fink wouldn't run anyway, much less be able to build packages. The Fink-0.8.1 installer for MacOSX 10.4 contained fink-0.24.23. -- Martin -- Using storage to extend the benefits of virtualization and iSCSI Virtualization increases hardware utilization and delivers a new level of agility. Learn what those decisions are and how to modernize your storage and backup environments for virtualization. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51434361/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
