Re: [Fink-devel] fort77/f2c BuildDepends problem

2005-10-03 Thread Jeff Whitaker

Daniel Macks wrote:


fort77-1.18-17 lists Depends:f2c, but f2c (20030428-2) is
BuildDependsOnly:true. The bin/fort77 script contains an explicit call
to the f2c binary, so the Depends makes sense. Is the BDO flag wrong?
Or are there other alternate packages of f2c's files, requiring that
f2c remain "swappable"?

dan

 


Dan:  I'm pretty sure the BDO flag in f2c is wrong.

-Jeff

--
Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 BroadwayWeb   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


[Fink-devel] fort77/f2c BuildDepends problem

2005-10-02 Thread Daniel Macks
fort77-1.18-17 lists Depends:f2c, but f2c (20030428-2) is
BuildDependsOnly:true. The bin/fort77 script contains an explicit call
to the f2c binary, so the Depends makes sense. Is the BDO flag wrong?
Or are there other alternate packages of f2c's files, requiring that
f2c remain "swappable"?

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel