[Fink-devel] testing needed

2003-04-01 Thread David R. Morrison
Hello.  Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following
packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace.  The new versions are all in the 
unstable tree.  It would be particularly useful to know that gnuplot-py,
octave, and siag work correctly with the new version of gnuplot.

The change which was made was to only build static libraries for pdflib,
and compile those into the other programs.  This was done for licensing
reasons, to enable us to distribute gnuplot and grace with our binary
distribution.

With this change, if I can get it pushed into stable quickly, we'll be
in the following happy situation: every package which is in the binary
distribution only depends on packages which are *also* in the binary
distribution.  No more user complaints that octave or pdftex can't be
installed because of some silly missing thing from the bindist.

Some of our Restrictive/Distributable packages will still have Build
dependencies which can't be distributed, but they'll have no actual
dependencies.

When the rush of getting the bindist out is over, I'll be proposing this
as a policy to be followed in the future, for all of our packages:
if you package depends on a Restrictive pacakge, then your package mujst
also be labelled as Restrictive.

But let's not debate that now!  Please, instead, help me test these few
and let me know your results.

  Thanks,
  Dave


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2003-04-01 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote:
Hello.  Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following
packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace.  The new versions are all in the 
unstable tree.  It would be particularly useful to know that gnuplot-py,
octave, and siag work correctly with the new version of gnuplot.
Please tell me this is an April fool's joke ;-)

The new pdflib-shlibs package has a circular symlink
libpdf.1.dylib-libpdf.1.dylib
which makes anything depending on libpdf crash (Too many levels of 
symbolic links).

The new gnuplot doesn't build a pdf terminal any more. This could have 
been achieved easier without change to the pdflib package, but I suppose 
it is not intentional?

The first instance of the new gnuplot I compiled failed with

gnuplot Expected X11 driver: 
/sw/src/root-gnuplot-3.8i.0-3/sw/lib/gnuplot/3.8i/gnuplot_x11
Exec failed: No such file or directory

In fact, it had the path 
/sw/src/root-gnuplot-3.8i.0-3/sw/lib/gnuplot/3.8i/gnuplot_x11 hardcoded 
into the /sw/bin/gnuplotx executable. I cannot reproduce this any more, 
because I rebuilt it and then this error disappeared. Weird.

Otherwise, octave and siag seem to work OK with the new gnuplot (except 
for pdf output, of course).

--
Martin


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2003-04-01 Thread David R. Morrison


On Apr 2,2003 00:38:09 +0200, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
David R. Morrison wrote:
 Hello.  Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following
 packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace.  The new versions are all in the 
 unstable tree.  It would be particularly useful to know that gnuplot-py,
 octave, and siag work correctly with the new version of gnuplot.

Please tell me this is an April fool's joke ;-)


No, I'm afraid it was serious.

The new pdflib-shlibs package has a circular symlink
libpdf.1.dylib-libpdf.1.dylib
which makes anything depending on libpdf crash (Too many levels of 
symbolic links).


Thanks for catching this; its now fixed in a new version.

The new gnuplot doesn't build a pdf terminal any more. This could have 
been achieved easier without change to the pdflib package, but I suppose 
it is not intentional?


Not intentional.  I'll look into it.

The first instance of the new gnuplot I compiled failed with

gnuplot Expected X11 driver: 
/sw/src/root-gnuplot-3.8i.0-3/sw/lib/gnuplot/3.8i/gnuplot_x11
Exec failed: No such file or directory

In fact, it had the path 
/sw/src/root-gnuplot-3.8i.0-3/sw/lib/gnuplot/3.8i/gnuplot_x11 hardcoded 
into the /sw/bin/gnuplotx executable. I cannot reproduce this any more, 
because I rebuilt it and then this error disappeared. Weird.

Otherwise, octave and siag seem to work OK with the new gnuplot (except 
for pdf output, of course).

-- 
Martin


Thanks for the feedback.  I'll see if I can get gnuplot fixed.

  -- Dave





---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2003-04-01 Thread Max Horn
With your latest gnuplot, I got:

...
  Enable generation of PDF files
...
So it *seems* PDF support is built properly now. Also the bogus 
pdflib.dylib symlink is not present.

Cheers,

Max



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2002-12-07 Thread Scott W Mitchell

OK, after seeing others' posts, I ignored the checksum error and
proceeded, but on the first time around I got a seg fault while
building apt.  On a second try, it compiled fine.  So I think it
was a random glitch but am posting these results anyways in case they
mean more to someone else...

Latest OS X and dev tools, G4-400 with 512MB RAM, everything else working
fine.

The problem was:

Compiling deb/debfile.cc to
/sw/src/apt-0.5.4-7/apt-0.5.4/obj/apt-inst/debfile.opic
In file included from /usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.1/g++-v3/memory:55,
 from /usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.1/g++-v3/string:48,
 from
/sw/src/apt-0.5.4-7/apt-0.5.4/include/apt-pkg/arfile.h:22,
 from
/sw/src/apt-0.5.4-7/apt-0.5.4/include/apt-pkg/debfile.h:30,
 from deb/debfile.cc:23:
/usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.1/g++-v3/bits/stl_alloc.h: In instantiation of
`std::allocatorchar':
/usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.1/g++-v3/bits/stl_alloc.h:928:   instantiated
from here
/usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.1/g++-v3/bits/stl_alloc.h:620: internal error:
   Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter for instructions.
make[2]: *** [/sw/src/apt-0.5.4-7/apt-0.5.4/obj/apt-inst/debfile.opic]
Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of  failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling apt-0.5.4-7 failed


On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, David R. Morrison wrote:

 Hi all.  I've just released fink-0.11.1-1 (to both 10.1 and 10.2) and
 apt-0.5.4-7 (to 10.2 only).

 I need testing reports on these ASAP so that I can move them to stable,
 so that I can release the bindist.

   Thanks,
   Dave


 ---
 This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
 Welcome to geek heaven.
 http://thinkgeek.com/sf
 ___
 Fink-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2002-12-07 Thread Xavier HUMBERT
I wrote :

 Good time to try and do an update-all I'm waiting after for a couple of
 weeks...

OK, my big compile lasted all night (things like expat an xfree :-) and
all went OK

I didn't see any bug so far.



-- 
Xavier
http://www.freetibet.org
http://www.tibet.fr/


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2002-12-07 Thread Scott W Mitchell

OK, sorry about the sloppy specification of my software versions.

OS 10.2.2 plus July + August dev tools and the Oct patch.  I am well aware
of the August-only install problem, but it is not the case here.  I'm
compiling other software all the time and it has all been working well.
For that matter, fink seems to be working fine now too.  Had the one
compile error and no trouble since.  It just updated itself to 0.11.1-10
without trouble, and the apt tools seem fine too.

And there's nothing related in /usr/local - just two local apps I've
added, neither of which has anything to do with the build environment
(nor conflicting names).

So... probably random glitch

On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Ben Hines wrote:

 Define latest dev tools. Such problems are usually caused by the user
 installing the August tool update (small update app) on top of the 10.1
 tools which is a big no-no. Install the JULY (jaguar) dev tools, then
 the updates after that.

 Another cause for such problems are bad things in /usr/local. Move
 /usr/local out of the way if you have anything there.

 -Ben



 ---
 This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
 Welcome to geek heaven.
 http://thinkgeek.com/sf
 ___
 Fink-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2002-12-06 Thread Alexander Hansen
I forgot to add that apt-0.5.4-7 seemed to build fine.

On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 14:51, David R. Morrison wrote:
 Hi all.  I've just released fink-0.11.1-1 (to both 10.1 and 10.2) and
 apt-0.5.4-7 (to 10.2 only).
 
 I need testing reports on these ASAP so that I can move them to stable,
 so that I can release the bindist.
 
   Thanks,
   Dave
 
 
 ---
 This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
 Welcome to geek heaven.
 http://thinkgeek.com/sf
 ___
 Fink-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
 
-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel