Re: [Fink-devel] Packages mentioning /sw/ by name in unstable
Alexander Strange wrote: There are currently four packages in unstable that mention /sw/ instead of %p where it might cause the build to error out: * Jeremy Higgs ettercap-ssl * Blair Zajac grass5.7 * Jeffrey Whitaker scilab-atlas scilab Besides that, there are many more packages that use /sw/ specifically in their Desc* fields. There were too many to mention by name, though. I think these are there because, historically, desc* didn't expand percent (I think that got changed recently.) --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Packages mentioning /sw/ by name in unstable
On Feb 27, 2005, at 12:48 AM, Alexander Strange wrote: * Jeffrey Whitaker scilab-atlas scilab Looking at these two again, they are actually correct (although not structured in the usual way). --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595alloc_id=14396op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Packages mentioning /sw/ by name in unstable
Le 27 févr. 2005, à 7:06, Benjamin Reed a écrit : Alexander Strange wrote: There are currently four packages in unstable that mention /sw/ instead of %p where it might cause the build to error out: * Jeremy Higgs ettercap-ssl * Blair Zajac grass5.7 * Jeffrey Whitaker scilab-atlas scilab Besides that, there are many more packages that use /sw/ specifically in their Desc* fields. There were too many to mention by name, though. Thanks for pointing it out, oversight from my part. I think these are there because, historically, desc* didn't expand percent (I think that got changed recently.) Does this expansion work on all trees/branches? Michèle http://micmacfr.homeunix.org PGP.sig Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=
