Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci weka.info,NONE,1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Daniel E. Macks wrote: | Kurt Schwehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: | |Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci | |--- NEW FILE: weka.info --- |Package: weka |DescPort: |Didn't compile from source since that is just available from CVS. The |weka web site descributes a dmg for OSX and a zip for Linux. Both |contain a bunch of jar files. | |License: GPL | | | How do we feel about using precompiled-binary stuff in this manner (or | at all)? Would be better to roll a CVS snapshot tarball for fink and | serve it from Fink's SF space? | | dan | As lonmg as it is distributable and the license does not create any obligations on our side, why not. I see no reason to recompile or repackage if the forementioned constraints are met. - -d -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBdKyiPMoaMn4kKR4RA9ncAJ9BiI2kxOQ1MKCzUz2srAVhgfXRMwCdE9Qj wxqZgKjHI36xSY3XuksUS9o= =B3BG -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci weka.info,NONE,1.1
On 19.10.2004, at 05:15, Daniel E. Macks wrote: Kurt Schwehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci --- NEW FILE: weka.info --- Package: weka DescPort: Didn't compile from source since that is just available from CVS. The weka web site descributes a dmg for OSX and a zip for Linux. Both contain a bunch of jar files. License: GPL How do we feel about using precompiled-binary stuff in this manner (or at all)? I think the policy is to avoid it whenever possible. Would be better to roll a CVS snapshot tarball for fink and serve it from Fink's SF space? That's what i have been doing until now: Package a tar ball from CVS and then have one of the core fink admins release the file under Fink. Chris. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci weka.info,NONE,1.1
Sure thing. I will try to get a snapshot based info file and tar ready this weekend. Thanks, -kurt Kurt Schwehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci --- NEW FILE: weka.info --- Package: weka DescPort: Didn't compile from source since that is just available from CVS. The weka web site descributes a dmg for OSX and a zip for Linux. Both contain a bunch of jar files. License: GPL How do we feel about using precompiled-binary stuff in this manner (or at all)? I think the policy is to avoid it whenever possible. Would be better to roll a CVS snapshot tarball for fink and serve it from Fink's SF space? That's what i have been doing until now: Package a tar ball from CVS and then have one of the core fink admins release the file under Fink. Chris. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
