Re: [Fink-devel] Re: gnubg-0.12-22
That worked fine. Thanks. -- ross Peter O'Gorman wrote: Matthias Neeracher wrote: On Mar 15, 2004, at 5:31 PM, Ross Nelson wrote: I just installed fink for the first time and I just tried a binary install of gnubg to see if fink was working, and though it seems to be in other respects, I got the following error when trying to run. dsl027-179-184:~ ross$ gnubg dyld: gnubg can't open library: /sw/lib/libdl.0.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2) Trace/BPT trap I don't see a libdl package in fink, so I'm not sure what to do next. That would be dlcompat. gnubg should build against the system libdl. fink-devel, is there something wrong with our binary build system, or should I put in a Conflicts: dlcompat? The current binaries were built on 10.2-gcc3.3, not 10.3, so the user can fix this issue with 'sudo apt-get install dlcompat-shlibs', the version of gnubg in 10.2-gcc3.3 must have been missing this Depends: line. The binaries that Dave is currently building will be built on 10.3 for 10.3 and 10.2-gcc3.3 for 10.2. So libSystem's dlcompat will be used. Matthias, you should fix the gnubg in 10.2-gcc3.3, and you need do nothing with the one in 10.3. Peter --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: gnubg-0.12-22
Matthias Neeracher wrote: On Mar 15, 2004, at 5:31 PM, Ross Nelson wrote: I just installed fink for the first time and I just tried a binary install of gnubg to see if fink was working, and though it seems to be in other respects, I got the following error when trying to run. dsl027-179-184:~ ross$ gnubg dyld: gnubg can't open library: /sw/lib/libdl.0.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2) Trace/BPT trap I don't see a libdl package in fink, so I'm not sure what to do next. That would be dlcompat. gnubg should build against the system libdl. fink-devel, is there something wrong with our binary build system, or should I put in a Conflicts: dlcompat? The current binaries were built on 10.2-gcc3.3, not 10.3, so the user can fix this issue with 'sudo apt-get install dlcompat-shlibs', the version of gnubg in 10.2-gcc3.3 must have been missing this Depends: line. The binaries that Dave is currently building will be built on 10.3 for 10.3 and 10.2-gcc3.3 for 10.2. So libSystem's dlcompat will be used. Matthias, you should fix the gnubg in 10.2-gcc3.3, and you need do nothing with the one in 10.3. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470alloc_id=3638op=click ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel