Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-08 Thread jfm
On May 8, 2004, at 3:06 AM, Ben Hines wrote:

On May 7, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
That did not happen to me. Perhaps it will only occur with programs 
which do not use ncurses, but which do use readline? Which programs ?
The 2 cases were from a local program, that linked both readline and 
ncurses _ in this order.
Clearly the order is important for the trouble _ but you need also that 
one of the object files does
reference one of those 3 symbols...
A quick sampling (yes _ the script is fast...):
for f in bc cadaver-ssl calc ekg-ssl gftp-ssl ghc guile guile16 hugs 
librep mutella mysql nickle \
octave-forge octave pilot-link9 python22 python23 r-base rpy-py23 ruby 
ruby18 samba-ldap \
units yafc yap singular hx term-readline-gnu-pm581 emacs21-xaw3d xemacs 
bash ; do echo $f; \
dlocate -L $f| xargs file | grep 'Mach\-O' | cut -f 1 -d ':' | xargs 
nm|grep -F '_BC
_UP
_PC' ; done

yielded only hx in addition (and indeed the command hx breaks as shown 
yesterday)

Also, at this point we might as well start adding versioned deps on 
the latest readline on anything this effects and rev upping them.
If we were to do this _ shouldn't we use the opportunity to bring 
readline up to date with all patches ?
We'll have to do it eventually to solve this. Only about 70 packages 
depend on readline, and this problem does not affect them all. I've 
tried a few (older binaries from apt-get) and haven't been able to 
find even one which does it.

In view of the above test, I'm not convinced this is necessary, as a 
practical matter.
If there are only about 70 pkgs, it may suffice to run the above test 
on them...
Of course, if its a matter of (shlibs-) policy, I don't know..  -)

Best,

Jean-Francois



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-08 Thread Ben Hines
On May 8, 2004, at 9:21 AM, jfm wrote:

turned up only pari-gp (the executable)_ and that's no problem, since 
otool shows gp links only with ncurses.

This must already cover a fair number of your 70 pkgs ...
So there is no problem then. We can update the 3 packages which have 
the problem.

-Ben



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-07 Thread Ben Hines
On May 7, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Ben Hines wrote:

That did not happen to me. Perhaps it will only occur with programs 
which do not use ncurses, but which do use readline? Which programs ?
	
Also, at this point we might as well start adding versioned deps on the 
latest readline on anything this effects and rev upping them.  We'll 
have to do it eventually to solve this. Only about 70 packages depend 
on readline, and this problem does not affect them all. I've tried a 
few (older binaries from apt-get) and haven't been able to find even 
one which does it.

-Ben



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson  Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel