Re: [Fink-devel] native GTK+
OH, it's gtk maintained, okay I'll look into it and report back. --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 25-Dec-07, at 12:45 AM, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > On 12/24/07, TheSin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> well i'm not sure what version of GTK+OSX, I just built 0.7 for intel >> 10.5 which took me about an hour and lots of little code changes, >> then >> I built gq, and it displays but nothing works, so unless there is a >> newer version I think it's useless. > > From what I understood, one should just build using normal 2.12 > distribution > > -- > Alexey Zakhlestin > http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] native GTK+
On 12/24/07, TheSin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well i'm not sure what version of GTK+OSX, I just built 0.7 for intel > 10.5 which took me about an hour and lots of little code changes, then > I built gq, and it displays but nothing works, so unless there is a > newer version I think it's useless. >From what I understood, one should just build using normal 2.12 distribution -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] native GTK+
well i'm not sure what version of GTK+OSX, I just built 0.7 for intel 10.5 which took me about an hour and lots of little code changes, then I built gq, and it displays but nothing works, so unless there is a newer version I think it's useless. --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 24-Dec-07, at 10:46 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:27:54AM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: >> Sounds like good news! >> >> http://developer.imendio.com/node/184 > > Yes. Native GTK has long been doable actually, and patches to bugs in > that arena (the Quartz back-end of gtk and related libs) are quite > well received upstream, suggesting that this is an important target > platform (at least to some of the devels:) there. > > At one time, there was a fork of some of fink's package collection > that was adjusted to use native aqua gtk. Note that this will always > be completely independent set of libraries (a whole parallel gtk > world), incompatible and not mix'n'match or drop-in replacement for > the exiting x11-based gnome world. > > > dan > > -- > Daniel Macks > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks > > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] native GTK+
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > On 12/24/07, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> independent set of libraries: yes but gtk-apps should be easily >>> linked against both, shouldn't they? :) >>> >> If you mean "both" in the sense of "separate Aqua and X11 packages", >> then possibly--the details depend on what the package wants. > > I mean majority of small-to-medium tools which use only gtk+ and glib stuff. > Of course, there are some which directly depend on X11, and I > understand that it's not possible to change them Of course all this is moot until Fink makes the move to 2.12.x, that is, until the pangocairo branch sees the light of the day. -- Martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] native GTK+
On 12/24/07, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > independent set of libraries: yes but gtk-apps should be easily > > linked against both, shouldn't they? :) > > > > If you mean "both" in the sense of "separate Aqua and X11 packages", > then possibly--the details depend on what the package wants. I mean majority of small-to-medium tools which use only gtk+ and glib stuff. Of course, there are some which directly depend on X11, and I understand that it's not possible to change them -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] native GTK+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > On 12/24/07, Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:27:54AM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin >> wrote: >>> Sounds like good news! >>> >>> http://developer.imendio.com/node/184 >> Yes. Native GTK has long been doable actually, and patches to >> bugs in that arena (the Quartz back-end of gtk and related libs) >> are quite well received upstream, suggesting that this is an >> important target platform (at least to some of the devels:) >> there. >> >> At one time, there was a fork of some of fink's package >> collection that was adjusted to use native aqua gtk. Note that >> this will always be completely independent set of libraries (a >> whole parallel gtk world), incompatible and not mix'n'match or >> drop-in replacement for the exiting x11-based gnome world. > > independent set of libraries: yes but gtk-apps should be easily > linked against both, shouldn't they? :) > If you mean "both" in the sense of "separate Aqua and X11 packages", then possibly--the details depend on what the package wants. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHb/iAB8UpO3rKjQ8RAlGMAJ9534M83nwyIwyTD3x77EYIi5E5QACgi+ZT S37HJvKs3IEu/73KbtVmjr0= =SGpY -END PGP SIGNATURE- - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] native GTK+
On 12/24/07, Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:27:54AM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > > Sounds like good news! > > > > http://developer.imendio.com/node/184 > > Yes. Native GTK has long been doable actually, and patches to bugs in > that arena (the Quartz back-end of gtk and related libs) are quite > well received upstream, suggesting that this is an important target > platform (at least to some of the devels:) there. > > At one time, there was a fork of some of fink's package collection > that was adjusted to use native aqua gtk. Note that this will always > be completely independent set of libraries (a whole parallel gtk > world), incompatible and not mix'n'match or drop-in replacement for > the exiting x11-based gnome world. independent set of libraries: yes but gtk-apps should be easily linked against both, shouldn't they? :) -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] native GTK+
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 01:27:54AM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > Sounds like good news! > > http://developer.imendio.com/node/184 Yes. Native GTK has long been doable actually, and patches to bugs in that arena (the Quartz back-end of gtk and related libs) are quite well received upstream, suggesting that this is an important target platform (at least to some of the devels:) there. At one time, there was a fork of some of fink's package collection that was adjusted to use native aqua gtk. Note that this will always be completely independent set of libraries (a whole parallel gtk world), incompatible and not mix'n'match or drop-in replacement for the exiting x11-based gnome world. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
