[Fink-devel] the 10.3 tree
Here's an update on the current state of the 10.3 tree. Currently, the 10.3 tree has only a very few things in it. A few are "placeholder" packages which allow fink to use some new components of the system in 10.3 which were not present in 10.2. Others are 10.3-specific revisions of packages. I've done a test build of all packages in 10.2-gcc3.3/stable, building under 10.3, and the vast majority of them build successfully. I will move all of the successful ones to 10.3 after the current 10.3-gcc3.3 bindist has been completed. (The reason for waiting is that there may be a need for minor tweaks such as missing BuildDepends, and it's easier to keep track of things if they are only in one tree at the moment.) However, additional contributions to the 10.3 tree, particularly of new versions of packages whose 10.2-gcc3.3 version didn't build, would be most welcome. PLEASE be sure to add 10 to the revision number if you are making a 10.3-specific modification of a package -- we should strive to have the info files in different trees agree whenever the package has the same version/revision number. Appended at the bottom of this message is the list of packages which failed to build on my latest attempt. The list is a bit misleading, because if one of the dependencies of a package failed to build, that package also appears on the list. So in some cases, just fixing the dependent package is all that's needed. (For example, openssl did not build and so there are large numbers of -ssl packages listed.) You'll also notice that the list includes splitoffs; the number of packages which actually need repair is smaller. -- Dave abs afni arb aspell-es bitchx bitchx-common bitchx-gtk bundle-kde-ssl class-dump dcmtk-ssl ddd dnstracer egd emboss gabber-ssl gaim gd gd-bin gd-shlibs ghemical gnubg gnubg-bearoff gnuplot gnuplot-py gq hdf hdf5 hdf5-bin hdf5-shlibs hevea host html-tree-pm irssi-ssl kdebase3-ssl kdebase3-ssl-dev kdebase3-ssl-shlibs kdelibs3-ssl kdelibs3-ssl-dev kdelibs3-ssl-shlibs kmud kseg lftp lftp-ssl libnasl libnasl-shlibs libnessus libnessus-shlibs libnessus-ssl libnessus-ssl-shlibs libxml-pm links-ssl lynx-ssl lyx lyx-qt madplay mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-chatzilla mozilla-dev mozilla-dom-inspector mozilla-js-debugger mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm mozilla-shlibs mpegencode mutt-ssl nedit nessus nessus-common nessus-common-nox nessus-plugins nightfall ocaml octave openldap-ssl openldap-ssl-dev openldap-ssl-shlibs openslp-ssl openslp-ssl-dev openslp-ssl-shlibs openssl openssl-dev openssl-shlibs pan pine-ssl postfix-release python21-socket-ssl python22-socket-ssl qt2-g++2 qt2-g++2-shlibs r-base root3 root3-shlibs root3-threaded root3-threaded-shlibs ruby ruby-dev ruby-shlibs samba-ldap scribus scribus-i18n-en scsh shermans-aquarium squid-ssl storable-pm560 storable-pm561 surf swig term-readkey-pm580 terraform texmacs texmacs-fonts uae vile vnc w3m-ssl xchat xchat-ssl xml-dom-pm xtraceroute --- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] the 10.3 tree (WAIT! READ THIS FIRST!)
David R. Morrison wrote: Here's an update on the current state of the 10.3 tree. Currently, the 10.3 tree has only a very few things in it. A few are "placeholder" packages which allow fink to use some new components of the system in 10.3 which were not present in 10.2. Others are 10.3-specific revisions of packages. I've done a test build of all packages in 10.2-gcc3.3/stable, building under 10.3, and the vast majority of them build successfully. I will move all of the successful ones to 10.3 after the current 10.3-gcc3.3 bindist has been completed. (The reason for waiting is that there may be a need for minor tweaks such as missing BuildDepends, and it's easier to keep track of things if they are only in one tree at the moment.) However, additional contributions to the 10.3 tree, particularly of new versions of packages whose 10.2-gcc3.3 version didn't build, would be most welcome. PLEASE be sure to add 10 to the revision number if you are making a 10.3-specific modification of a package -- we should strive to have the info files in different trees agree whenever the package has the same version/revision number. One *VERY* important thing to do before adding stuff to the 10.3 tree is: * change freetype2-using packages to use the freetype2 in X11R6 - most packages will just find the right one automatically. - just remove freetype2 from Depends and BuildDepends. * change libpoll-using packages to use the system libpoll - just remove libpoll from Depends and BuildDepends. * change dlcompat-using packages to use the system dlcompat - most packages, remove the dlcompat from Depends and BuildDepends. - some packages will need work, as -Ddlsym=foo may not work like you expect! Also, dlsym *automatically* prepends an underscore, so if your code expects otherwise or doesn't check properly, it may build but be unable to load loadable modules. The freetype2, dlcompat, and libpoll packages that exist are there for upgrade purposes. Eventually there should be nothing in the 10.3 that uses or references them. Remember, if you change any of those dependencies, add 10 to the revision. --- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] the 10.3 tree
> That would be pretty tough to do on 10.3 since most of the dependencies > aren't in the 10.3 tree yet. I'd have to move all them over. If you > want that help, you should move the working packages into the 10.3 tree > now. > > Anyway, waiting makes it too difficult for me to contribute, so I > probably won't.. too much work to reboot to 10.2 all the time. Justin made a similar point. I'll move everything over this evening, and then hopefully it will be easier for others to help out. -- Dave --- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Bus error / segfault on Mac OSX, once again
Hi, the thread (as in the subject) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06109.html was useful to me; I would like to add that, I have encountered similar error with Qt3 (sometimes also with QTextCodec::locale(), sometimes at other places) and discovered that this depends on if I use gcc3.3 or gcc3.1. While I have Qt build with 3.1, there is an error when Im trying to use gcc3.3. So whe using single compiler version all is ok. Sorry if this info was trivial or already posted here, but hope it could help somebody. -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek / OpenOffice Polska Kexi Project: http://www.kexi-project.org, http://koffice.kde.org/kexi QT-KDE Wrapper Project: http://iidea.pl/~js/qkw --- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Bus error / segfault on Mac OSX, once again
Jarosław Staniek wrote: Hi, the thread (as in the subject) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06109.html was useful to me; I would like to add that, I have encountered similar error with Qt3 (sometimes also with QTextCodec::locale(), sometimes at other places) and discovered that this depends on if I use gcc3.3 or gcc3.1. While I have Qt build with 3.1, there is an error when Im trying to use gcc3.3. So whe using single compiler version all is ok. Sorry if this info was trivial or already posted here, but hope it could help somebody. This is completely unrelated to anything specific to fink. You cannot mix and match compiled c++ code between gcc 3.1 and gcc 3.3, everything has to match or you will have problems. If you built qt with 3.1, anything you want to build against qt must be built with 3.1. That's the reason for the gcc3.3 tree that's in freeze right now, and the (future) panther tree. They upgrade everything c++ (and anything dependent on it) so that you will have everything built with the new gcc. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] the 10.3 tree
On Monday, Oct 20, 2003, at 09:19 US/Eastern, David R. Morrison wrote: emboss I am the current maintainer of emboss. The version that is in unstable (2.7.1-4) builds fine on 10.2-gcc33, so I guess the one you are referring to is 2.6.0 that is in stable? I've had enough good replies from users, so as far as I am concerned version 2.7.1-4 can be moved to stable. I don't have 10.3, so I cannot test it on that system. - Koen. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
