Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Hansen < alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote: > We're approaching the May 16 planned deadline for a new Fink (0.33.0) > release. The current plan is to incorporate: > > 2) moving creation of the fink-bld user from passwd-fink-bld into fink, > as per https://github.com/fink/fink/pull/30 . > Note that if there is already a fink-bld user, fink recognizes it. This > will also entail using a dummy passwd-fink-bld package in the 10.7/ tree > to replace the real package, and updating passwd in the 10.4/ tree so > that it doesn't generate the passwd-fink-bld user anymore. > I hacked together an alternative to this branch, which creates the fink-bld user and group during selfupdate or bootstrap, but selects a UID which is not on the system rather than using a fixed one: https://github.com/dustinac/fink/commits/add-fink-bld Some background: Currently, fink-bld is always created with UID 266. As was discussed on fink-core, this could be a problem in the rare case that UID 266 has already been assigned to a different user on the system prior to installing or updating fink. With an autoselected UID, there is no risk of such a collision. Dustin -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
I think Dustin's approach is a good one -- less intrusive to users' systems. -- Dave On May 10, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > We're approaching the May 16 planned deadline for a new Fink (0.33.0) > release. The current plan is to incorporate: > > 2) moving creation of the fink-bld user from passwd-fink-bld into fink, > as per https://github.com/fink/fink/pull/30 . > Note that if there is already a fink-bld user, fink recognizes it. This > will also entail using a dummy passwd-fink-bld package in the 10.7/ tree > to replace the real package, and updating passwd in the 10.4/ tree so > that it doesn't generate the passwd-fink-bld user anymore. > > I hacked together an alternative to this branch, which creates the fink-bld > user and group during selfupdate or bootstrap, but selects a UID which is not > on the system rather than using a fixed one: > > https://github.com/dustinac/fink/commits/add-fink-bld > > Some background: Currently, fink-bld is always created with UID 266. As was > discussed on fink-core, this could be a problem in the rare case that UID 266 > has already been assigned to a different user on the system prior to > installing or updating fink. With an autoselected UID, there is no risk of > such a collision. > > Dustin > -- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
the problem with it IIRC from WAY BACK want I worked on my uidgid branch is that dpkg stores the uid/gid and did not the name/group, so if the uid differs when a deb is installed instead of the the fink build process it will have the wrong perms, unless things have changed since then. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2012-05-10, at 6:33 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: > I think Dustin's approach is a good one -- less intrusive to users' systems. > > -- Dave > > On May 10, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: > >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Hansen >> wrote: >> We're approaching the May 16 planned deadline for a new Fink (0.33.0) >> release. The current plan is to incorporate: >> >> 2) moving creation of the fink-bld user from passwd-fink-bld into fink, >> as per https://github.com/fink/fink/pull/30 . >> Note that if there is already a fink-bld user, fink recognizes it. This >> will also entail using a dummy passwd-fink-bld package in the 10.7/ tree >> to replace the real package, and updating passwd in the 10.4/ tree so >> that it doesn't generate the passwd-fink-bld user anymore. >> >> I hacked together an alternative to this branch, which creates the fink-bld >> user and group during selfupdate or bootstrap, but selects a UID which is >> not on the system rather than using a fixed one: >> >> https://github.com/dustinac/fink/commits/add-fink-bld >> >> Some background: Currently, fink-bld is always created with UID 266. As was >> discussed on fink-core, this could be a problem in the rare case that UID >> 266 has already been assigned to a different user on the system prior to >> installing or updating fink. With an autoselected UID, there is no risk of >> such a collision. >> >> Dustin >> -- >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. >> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ >> Fink-devel mailing list >> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> List archive: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >> Subscription management: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > > -- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
Hi Justin. Long time no see :) Actually, this particular user is only being used during "fink build." No files are supposed to belong to that user at the end of the build process. So there shouldn't be a problem. (But maybe we should, if we don't already, do a validator check to make sure that no files are owed by fink-bld.) -- Dave On May 10, 2012, at 9:33 AM, TheSin wrote: > the problem with it IIRC from WAY BACK want I worked on my uidgid branch is > that dpkg stores the uid/gid and did not the name/group, so if the uid > differs when a deb is installed instead of the the fink build process it will > have the wrong perms, unless things have changed since then. > --- > TS > http://www.southofheaven.org/ > Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! > > On 2012-05-10, at 6:33 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: > >> I think Dustin's approach is a good one -- less intrusive to users' systems. >> >> -- Dave >> >> On May 10, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Hansen >>> wrote: >>> We're approaching the May 16 planned deadline for a new Fink (0.33.0) >>> release. The current plan is to incorporate: >>> >>> 2) moving creation of the fink-bld user from passwd-fink-bld into fink, >>> as per https://github.com/fink/fink/pull/30 . >>> Note that if there is already a fink-bld user, fink recognizes it. This >>> will also entail using a dummy passwd-fink-bld package in the 10.7/ tree >>> to replace the real package, and updating passwd in the 10.4/ tree so >>> that it doesn't generate the passwd-fink-bld user anymore. >>> >>> I hacked together an alternative to this branch, which creates the fink-bld >>> user and group during selfupdate or bootstrap, but selects a UID which is >>> not on the system rather than using a fixed one: >>> >>> https://github.com/dustinac/fink/commits/add-fink-bld >>> >>> Some background: Currently, fink-bld is always created with UID 266. As was >>> discussed on fink-core, this could be a problem in the rare case that UID >>> 266 has already been assigned to a different user on the system prior to >>> installing or updating fink. With an autoselected UID, there is no risk of >>> such a collision. >>> >>> Dustin >>> -- >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>> threats. >>> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ >>> Fink-devel mailing list >>> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> List archive: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >>> Subscription management: >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel >> >> -- >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. >> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ >> Fink-devel mailing list >> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> List archive: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >> Subscription management: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
ahh that makes sense now ;) I thought this was suppose to replace passed like in my uidgid branch, I was going to say to counter that issue I created pastiest ownership scripts that auto generated. But since that isn't' the case I'll go back to my quiet corner and let the people that know wants going on talk and not interrupt ;) And for sure arm been a while I missed you guys so I decided to make more time for fink again. ;) --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2012-05-10, at 8:08 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: > Hi Justin. Long time no see :) > > Actually, this particular user is only being used during "fink build." No > files are supposed to belong to that user at the end of the build process. > So there shouldn't be a problem. > > (But maybe we should, if we don't already, do a validator check to make sure > that no files are owed by fink-bld.) > > -- Dave > > > On May 10, 2012, at 9:33 AM, TheSin wrote: > >> the problem with it IIRC from WAY BACK want I worked on my uidgid branch is >> that dpkg stores the uid/gid and did not the name/group, so if the uid >> differs when a deb is installed instead of the the fink build process it >> will have the wrong perms, unless things have changed since then. >> --- >> TS >> http://www.southofheaven.org/ >> Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! >> >> On 2012-05-10, at 6:33 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: >> >>> I think Dustin's approach is a good one -- less intrusive to users' systems. >>> >>> -- Dave >>> >>> On May 10, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: We're approaching the May 16 planned deadline for a new Fink (0.33.0) release. The current plan is to incorporate: 2) moving creation of the fink-bld user from passwd-fink-bld into fink, as per https://github.com/fink/fink/pull/30 . Note that if there is already a fink-bld user, fink recognizes it. This will also entail using a dummy passwd-fink-bld package in the 10.7/ tree to replace the real package, and updating passwd in the 10.4/ tree so that it doesn't generate the passwd-fink-bld user anymore. I hacked together an alternative to this branch, which creates the fink-bld user and group during selfupdate or bootstrap, but selects a UID which is not on the system rather than using a fixed one: https://github.com/dustinac/fink/commits/add-fink-bld Some background: Currently, fink-bld is always created with UID 266. As was discussed on fink-core, this could be a problem in the rare case that UID 266 has already been assigned to a different user on the system prior to installing or updating fink. With an autoselected UID, there is no risk of such a collision. Dustin -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel >>> >>> -- >>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >>> threats. >>> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ >>> Fink-devel mailing list >>> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> List archive: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >>> Subscription management: >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel >> > -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] openssl issue?
Dear Daniel Johnson, On 09.05.2012 19:08, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Dear Daniel Johnson, > > it seems to be related to openssl ... and since you are also the > maintainer of openssl here is the next report. well, it seems it is an error of the server. Please read http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/9302d75a4b6f1076# BTW: openssl-1.0.1b is out. Best regards Andreas Bießmann -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] (no subject)
Hi Oliver, I want to use the transcode stabilize-filter but i get the following output: --- snip --- $ transcode -J stabilize -i PICT0001.AVI -o dummy -y null,null transcode v1.1.0 (C) 2001-2003 Thomas Oestreich, 2003-2009 Transcode Team [transcode] V: auto-probing | PICT0001.AVI (OK) [transcode] V: import format| MJPEG in RIFF data, AVI (module=ffmpeg) [transcode] A: auto-probing | PICT0001.AVI (OK) [transcode] A: import format| PCM in RIFF data, AVI (module=raw) [transcode] V: AV demux/sync| (1) sync AV at initial MPEG sequence [transcode] V: import frame | 1280x720 1.78:1 encoded @ 16:9 [transcode] V: bits/pixel | 0.065 (low) [transcode] V: decoding fps,frc | 30.000,5 [transcode] V: video format | YUV420 (4:2:0) aka I420 [transcode] A: import format| 0x1 PCM [8000,16,1] 128 kbps [transcode] A: export | disabled [transcode] V: encoding fps,frc | 30.000,5 [transcode] A: bytes per frame | 534 (533.33) [transcode] A: adjustment | -664@1000 [transcode] V: video buffer | 10 @ 1280x720 [0x2] [transcode] A: audio buffer | 10 @ 8000x1x16 [import_raw.so] v0.3.3 (2008-11-23) (video) RGB/YUV | (audio) PCM [import_ffmpeg.so] v0.1.15 (2008-01-28) (video) ffmpeg: MS MPEG4v1-3/MPEG4/MJPEG [transcode] warning: Unable to load filter stabilize: dlopen(/sw/lib/transcode/filter_stabilize.so, 2): Symbol not found: _tc_list_del Referenced from: /sw/lib/transcode/filter_stabilize.so Expected in: flat namespace in /sw/lib/transcode/filter_stabilize.so [export_null.so] v0.1.2 (2001-08-17) (video) null | (audio) null [import_raw.so] tcextract -x pcm -i "PICT0001.AVI" -d 0 | tcextract -a 0 -x pcm -d 0 -t raw [import_ffmpeg.so] input is mjpeg, reducing range from YUVJ420P to YUV420P [filter_levels.so] instance #1 [filter_levels.so] v1.2.0 (2007-06-07) Luminosity level scaler [filter_levels.so] scaling 0-255 gamma 1.00 to 16-240 (pre-process) ^C[transcode] (sighandler) SIGINT received0:00:05, ( 9| 0|11) [decoder.c] cancelling the import threads [transcode] (sighandler) SIGINT received [transcode] encoded 173 frames (0 dropped, 0 cloned), clip length 5.77 s --- snap --- I am running transcode on Mac OS X 10.6.8 on a MacBookPro6,2. transcode was installed via 'fink install transcode' (fink system itself is current) Any Suggestions? Regards, Christian Adams -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCS$/IT d- s: a? C++(+++)> UL P++(+++)> L++(+++) E--- W++ N(+) o? K? !w !O !M+> !V PS(+) PE Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5(+)>++ X(+) R* tv->+ b++(+++) DI++ D++(+++)> G(+)>++ e+>+++ h-()>++ r++ y++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
It didn't do the right thing for me, apparently: Adding user and group fink-bld for building packages unprivileged No packages to install. The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other packages using commands like 'fink update-all'. Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) (OS 10.7.4, if it matters) On 5/10/12 1:32 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Alexander Hansen > mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > We're approaching the May 16 planned deadline for a new Fink (0.33.0) > release. The current plan is to incorporate: > > 2) moving creation of the fink-bld user from passwd-fink-bld into fink, > as per https://github.com/fink/fink/pull/30 . > Note that if there is already a fink-bld user, fink recognizes it. This > will also entail using a dummy passwd-fink-bld package in the 10.7/ tree > to replace the real package, and updating passwd in the 10.4/ tree so > that it doesn't generate the passwd-fink-bld user anymore. > > > I hacked together an alternative to this branch, which creates the > fink-bld user and group during selfupdate or bootstrap, but selects a > UID which is not on the system rather than using a fixed one: > > https://github.com/dustinac/fink/commits/add-fink-bld > > Some background: Currently, fink-bld is always created with UID 266. As > was discussed on fink-core, this could be a problem in the rare case > that UID 266 has already been assigned to a different user on the system > prior to installing or updating fink. With an autoselected UID, there is > no risk of such a collision. > > Dustin -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Fink's r-base214 and r-base215 fail to build on 10.6 and 10.7
r-base214 and r-base215 fail to build with this error: install_name_tool: can't open file: grDevices/libs/cairo.dylib (No such file or directory) The actual cause is a missing BuildDepends on glitz (for glitz.pc) which causes cairo and pango to not be found by pkg-config. Hanspeter -- Hanspeter Niederstrasser hanspeter AT snaggledworks DOT com -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Alexander Hansen < alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote: > It didn't do the right thing for me, apparently: > > Adding user and group fink-bld for building packages unprivileged > No packages to install. > > The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other > packages > using commands like 'fink update-all'. > > Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld > uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) > > groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) > > (OS 10.7.4, if it matters) > Strange. It worked for me on 10.6.8. One difference I noticed between the passwd package and the new code is that the former adds the users and then the groups whereas the latter adds the fink-bld group and then the fink-bld user. I'm not really sure how, but this could be making the difference. I changed the order in my branch. Can you try again with the updated version? If that doesn't fix it, what happens if you delete the fink-bld user, but not the group? Dustin -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
On 5/10/12 11:02 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Alexander Hansen > mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > It didn't do the right thing for me, apparently: > > Adding user and group fink-bld for building packages unprivileged > No packages to install. > > The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other > packages > using commands like 'fink update-all'. > > Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld > uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) > > groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) > > (OS 10.7.4, if it matters) > > > Strange. It worked for me on 10.6.8. One difference I noticed between > the passwd package and the new code is that the former adds the users > and then the groups whereas the latter adds the fink-bld group and then > the fink-bld user. I'm not really sure how, but this could be making the > difference. I changed the order in my branch. Can you try again with the > updated version? If that doesn't fix it, what happens if you delete the > fink-bld user, but not the group? > > Dustin The updated version gave me the same thing (and this was definitely after deleting the fink-bld user and group): Adding user and group fink-bld for building packages unprivileged No packages to install. The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other packages using commands like 'fink update-all'. Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) When I deleted the fink-bld user and did another selfupdate, I got the same thing: Adding user and group fink-bld for building packages unprivileged No packages to install. The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other packages using commands like 'fink update-all'. Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] openssl issue?
On May 10, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Dear Daniel Johnson, > > On 09.05.2012 19:08, Andreas Bießmann wrote: >> Dear Daniel Johnson, >> >> it seems to be related to openssl ... and since you are also the >> maintainer of openssl here is the next report. > > well, it seems it is an error of the server. Please read > http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.openssl.users/browse_thread/thread/9302d75a4b6f1076# > > BTW: openssl-1.0.1b is out. > > Best regards > > Andreas Bießmann Sorry I haven't gotten back to you yet. Yes, this kind of issue is usually a misconfigured server. Recent openssls tend to find them because of the new TLS 1.1 and 1.2 support. Openssl 1.0.1c (and 0.9.8x) actually just came out and I'll be updating to them shortly. Daniel -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
On 5/10/12 11:04 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Alexander Hansen > mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > It didn't do the right thing for me, apparently: > > Adding user and group fink-bld for building packages unprivileged > No packages to install. > > The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other > packages > using commands like 'fink update-all'. > > Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld > uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) > > groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) > > (OS 10.7.4, if it matters) > > > Strange. It worked for me on 10.6.8. One difference I noticed between > the passwd package and the new code is that the former adds the users > and then the groups whereas the latter adds the fink-bld group and then > the fink-bld user. I'm not really sure how, but this could be making the > difference. I changed the order in my branch. Can you try again with the > updated version? If that doesn't fix it, what happens if you delete the > fink-bld user, but not the group? > > Dustin I made some debugging progress. On 10.7 I get: $ dscl . -read /Users/fink-bld gid dsAttrTypeNative:gid: 280 Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) On 10.6, on the other hand, from an absolutely identical fink checkout: $ id fink-bld uid=280(fink-bld) gid=280(fink-bld) groups=280(fink-bld),101(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),61(localaccounts),12(everyone),102(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2) I'm not sure why it's being balky on 10.7. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] New fink release imminent
On 5/10/12 3:06 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 5/10/12 11:04 AM, Dustin Cartwright wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Alexander Hansen >> mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> It didn't do the right thing for me, apparently: >> >> Adding user and group fink-bld for building packages unprivileged >> No packages to install. >> >> The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other >> packages >> using commands like 'fink update-all'. >> >> Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld >> uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) >> >> groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) >> >> (OS 10.7.4, if it matters) >> >> >> Strange. It worked for me on 10.6.8. One difference I noticed between >> the passwd package and the new code is that the former adds the users >> and then the groups whereas the latter adds the fink-bld group and then >> the fink-bld user. I'm not really sure how, but this could be making the >> difference. I changed the order in my branch. Can you try again with the >> updated version? If that doesn't fix it, what happens if you delete the >> fink-bld user, but not the group? >> >> Dustin > > I made some debugging progress. > > On 10.7 I get: > > $ dscl . -read /Users/fink-bld gid > dsAttrTypeNative:gid: 280 > Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:my_fink hansen$ id fink-bld > uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) > groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) > > On 10.6, on the other hand, from an absolutely identical fink checkout: > $ id fink-bld > uid=280(fink-bld) gid=280(fink-bld) > groups=280(fink-bld),101(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),61(localaccounts),12(everyone),102(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2) > > I'm not sure why it's being balky on 10.7. On 10.7, everything seems to get set properly after one more selfupdate: Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:web hansen$ id fink-bld uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:web hansen$ id fink-bld uid=4294967294(fink-bld) gid=4294967294(nobody) groups=4294967294(nobody),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) Alexanders-MacBook-Pro:web hansen$ id fink-bld uid=280(fink-bld) gid=280(fink-bld) groups=280(fink-bld),402(com.apple.sharepoint.group.1),403(com.apple.sharepoint.group.2),12(everyone),61(localaccounts) -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] (no subject)
On 5/9/12 4:32 AM, Christian Adams wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > I want to use the transcode stabilize-filter but i get the following output: > > --- snip --- > > $ transcode -J stabilize -i PICT0001.AVI -o dummy -y null,null > transcode v1.1.0 (C) 2001-2003 Thomas Oestreich, 2003-2009 Transcode Team > [transcode] V: auto-probing | PICT0001.AVI (OK) > [transcode] V: import format| MJPEG in RIFF data, AVI (module=ffmpeg) > [transcode] A: auto-probing | PICT0001.AVI (OK) > [transcode] A: import format| PCM in RIFF data, AVI (module=raw) > [transcode] V: AV demux/sync| (1) sync AV at initial MPEG sequence > [transcode] V: import frame | 1280x720 1.78:1 encoded @ 16:9 > [transcode] V: bits/pixel | 0.065 (low) > [transcode] V: decoding fps,frc | 30.000,5 > [transcode] V: video format | YUV420 (4:2:0) aka I420 > [transcode] A: import format| 0x1 PCM [8000,16,1] 128 kbps > [transcode] A: export | disabled > [transcode] V: encoding fps,frc | 30.000,5 > [transcode] A: bytes per frame | 534 (533.33) > [transcode] A: adjustment | -664@1000 > [transcode] V: video buffer | 10 @ 1280x720 [0x2] > [transcode] A: audio buffer | 10 @ 8000x1x16 > [import_raw.so] v0.3.3 (2008-11-23) (video) RGB/YUV | (audio) PCM > [import_ffmpeg.so] v0.1.15 (2008-01-28) (video) ffmpeg: MS > MPEG4v1-3/MPEG4/MJPEG > [transcode] warning: Unable to load filter stabilize: > dlopen(/sw/lib/transcode/filter_stabilize.so, 2): Symbol not found: > _tc_list_del > Referenced from: /sw/lib/transcode/filter_stabilize.so > Expected in: flat namespace > in /sw/lib/transcode/filter_stabilize.so > [export_null.so] v0.1.2 (2001-08-17) (video) null | (audio) null > [import_raw.so] tcextract -x pcm -i "PICT0001.AVI" -d 0 | tcextract -a > 0 -x pcm -d 0 -t raw > [import_ffmpeg.so] input is mjpeg, reducing range from YUVJ420P to YUV420P > [filter_levels.so] instance #1 > [filter_levels.so] v1.2.0 (2007-06-07) Luminosity level scaler > [filter_levels.so] scaling 0-255 gamma 1.00 to 16-240 (pre-process) > ^C[transcode] (sighandler) SIGINT received0:00:05, ( 9| 0|11) > [decoder.c] cancelling the import threads > [transcode] (sighandler) SIGINT received > > [transcode] encoded 173 frames (0 dropped, 0 cloned), clip length 5.77 s > > --- snap --- > > I am running transcode on Mac OS X 10.6.8 on a MacBookPro6,2. > transcode was installed via 'fink install transcode' (fink system > itself is current) > > Any Suggestions? > > Regards, > Christian Adams > -- > > 32 or 64 bit Fink? -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
