[Fink-users] Re: gfortran question

2005-07-25 Thread Charles Williams
Thanks, Dominique.  The flag you suggested gets rid of the warnings, at least for a simple test problem.  I don't think it makes any difference in the code produced, but the warnings were annoying.Thanks,CharlesOn Jul 23, 2005, at 11:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Message: 1 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:01:33 +0200 To: fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dominique Dhumieres) Subject: [Fink-users] Re: gfortran question  I have installed gfortran as part of the gcc4 package (2:4.0.1-2).  I   am able to create an executable using gfortran, but when I compile   anything, I get messages like: [snip] This does not happen using either g95 or g77, and it did not happen   with my previous Panther installation.  Is this something I should be   concerned about?  Does anyone else see this sort of behavior, or do I   have a messed up installation? [snip]  Charles,  On OSX 10.3.9, I don't see the problem with the "official" package, but I have  built on my own several 4.1 snapshots and since the 20050709 one I see the  problem.  I have notified Jeff Whitaker about it (I should probably post a mail on the gfortran list some day).  As far as I can tell, adding -bind_at_load at the end of the loading line (i.e., gfortran testfort.F -bind_at_load in your case) remove the warnings and the executables ran fine in my tests.  In some instances I got:  /sw/lib/odcctools/bin/ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _cacoshf /usr/lib/libmx.dylib(single module) definition of _cacoshf ...  and did not find so far anyway to get rid of these warning.  Cheers  Dominique  Charles A. Williams Dept. of Earth  Environmental Sciences Science Center, 2C01B Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY  12180 Phone:    (518) 276-3369 FAX:        (518) 276-2012 e-mail:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

[Fink-users] Re: selfupdate-cvs broken

2005-07-25 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Richard C. Cobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 OS X 10.4.2
 XCode 2.0
 Package manager version: 0.23.10
 Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync

 Fresh fink installation on a fresh 10.4 installation.  I'm tracking
 stable, but I need to install msmtp and a couple of other packages that
 are only available in unstable.  Unfortunately, selfupdate-cvs isn't
 working right now:

The first item in the SourceForge Site Status, is linked from the
SF.net Resources sidebar of all http://sourceforge.net pages, notes:

  As of 2005-07-27 anonymous access to CVS for projects starting with
  l, s, f, b, r, k is currently offline.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] Re: selfupdate-cvs broken

2005-07-25 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Richard C. Cobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 Right; I normally use rsync, but I don't want to switch my entire
 installation over to the unstable tree, so I don't have much choice.

Choice of selfupdate method is orthogonal to use of unstable vs stable.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Re: selfupdate-cvs broken

2005-07-25 Thread Richard Cobbe
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:31:50PM +, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
 Richard C. Cobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
  Right; I normally use rsync, but I don't want to switch my entire
  installation over to the unstable tree, so I don't have much choice.
 
 Choice of selfupdate method is orthogonal to use of unstable vs stable.

That hasn't always been the case, though, right?  FAQ Q5.8 still says
the following:

  If you only want one or two specific packages, and nothing else from
  unstable, then you need to switch over to CVS updating (i.e. use fink
  selfupdate-cvs), because rsync only updates the trees that are active
  in your fink.conf.

And my fink.conf doesn't list unstable at all.

Richard


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] Evolution

2005-07-25 Thread Sharp Jonathan-O2320C



Has anyone been able 
to get Evolution installed (unstable)?

-js


Re: [Fink-users] Evolution

2005-07-25 Thread Alexander K. Hansen

Sharp Jonathan-O2320C wrote:


Has anyone been able to get Evolution installed (unstable)?
 
-js


Yes.

What OS version are you on?

--AH


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Re: selfupdate-cvs broken

2005-07-25 Thread Alexander K. Hansen

Richard Cobbe wrote:


On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:31:50PM +, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
 


Richard C. Cobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
   


Right; I normally use rsync, but I don't want to switch my entire
installation over to the unstable tree, so I don't have much choice.
 


Choice of selfupdate method is orthogonal to use of unstable vs stable.
   



That hasn't always been the case, though, right?  FAQ Q5.8 still says
the following:

 If you only want one or two specific packages, and nothing else from
 unstable, then you need to switch over to CVS updating (i.e. use fink
 selfupdate-cvs), because rsync only updates the trees that are active
 in your fink.conf.

And my fink.conf doesn't list unstable at all.

Richard


 

This language was really intended to stave off mass package updates via 
fink update-all.  One can turn the unstable tree completely on in 
fink.conf, run an rsync selfupdate, install a package from the unstable 
tree (and any versioned dependencies for it), then turn unstable off.   
CVS updating was advocated in this case mainly because it updates all of 
the trees (though in this case you may have to install versioned 
dependencies manually).


The ViewCVS module (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/dists/) 
lets you download the individual package .info and .patch files 
regardless of what update method you use--we don't list it as a 
preferred method mainly because it takes more effort on the user's part.


--AH


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] Launching apache2 in 10.4

2005-07-25 Thread Andrew n marshall

My fink install of apache 2 is not starting up when the rest of the computer
starts up.  With my old 10.3 setup, apache 2 just worked following the fink
install.  Now that we have the new launchd framework, I'm not certain what I
need to do to get apache 2 to run on boot.  The usual apachectl exits, and thus
doesn't meet the requirtements for launchd.

What is the recommended way to start apache2 in Tiger?

If it makes a difference, I did a clean install of Tiger.  I've read this has an
effect on how some services are started (apparently there is some service
porting code in the Tiger upgrade installer).


Anm



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users