[Fink-users] Re: Upgrade ImageMagick Version?

2004-09-10 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 7:09 PM + 9/10/04, Daniel E. Macks wrote:
I see 10.3/unstable just got upgraded to 6.0.7-1.
Great. Thanks for letting me know, I'll try it.
Regarding our stable tree, we need positive feedback about a package
before we move it to stable. So if you find a package in unstable that
works well but is not in stable, please tell the maintainer or let us
know on fink-devel.
Thanks again, I'll remember the point. Regarding this particular 
package, as I said, I  installed the version the ImageMagick folks 
were calling stable, thus your comments don't apply, exactly. (I did 
offer positive feedback regarding the 6.06 version, though.) If 
6.0.7-1 works for me, I'll certainly feed that back to the list.

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] Re: Upgrade ImageMagick Version?

2004-09-10 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Jonathan Levi MD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> I'd really like to suggest upgrading our imagemagick pagkages from 
> the 5.5.1-23 and 5.5.6-23 in our respective stable and unstable 
> trees. ImageMagick itself is currently offering 6.0.6-2 "Stable", 
> 6.0.7 "Beta" at its web site. I've built 6.0.6-2 myself and have been 
> using it for a week (admittedly, only the "convert" application) 
> without problems. Why not at least put 6.0.6-2 "Stable" in our 
> unstable tree?

I see 10.3/unstable just got upgraded to 6.0.7-1.

Regarding our stable tree, we need positive feedback about a package
before we move it to stable. So if you find a package in unstable that
works well but is not in stable, please tell the maintainer or let us
know on fink-devel.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] Re: Upgrade ImageMagick Version?

2004-09-06 Thread Darian Lanx
Jonathan Levi MD wrote:
Dear Fink Users,
I'd really like to suggest upgrading our imagemagick pagkages from the 
5.5.1-23 and 5.5.6-23 in our respective stable and unstable trees. 
ImageMagick itself is currently offering 6.0.6-2 "Stable", 6.0.7 "Beta" 
at its web site. I've built 6.0.6-2 myself and have been using it for a 
week (admittedly, only the "convert" application) without problems. Why 
not at least put 6.0.6-2 "Stable" in our unstable tree?

Jonathan
Get in touch with the maintainer and convince him/her to update the 
package. If that is not possible because the maintainer has gone AWOL, 
please submit an updated package to the tracker. Thank you

-d

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users