RE: [firebird-support] Help required

2012-08-01 Thread Mahesh Pratihari
Thanks

 

From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas
Steinmaurer
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 12:15 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Help required

 

  

Mahesh,

 Could you please let me know what is the equivalent of varbinary( max)
 of SQL datatype in Firebird.

In general, BLOB with an appropriate sub-type. If you are storing binary

data (images, ...) use a sub-type of 0. If you intend to store text 
data, use sub-type 1.

E.g.

column BLOB SUB_TYPE 0
column BLOB SUB_TYPE 1

-- 
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[firebird-support] Re: Possible interaction between Firebird and Skype?

2012-08-01 Thread cgr_firebird
Svein and Reinier,

Thanks for replying to my query and for your suggestions. Sorry for not being 
quick to reply to you both - I'm travelling at the moment, with intermittent 
access to broadband.  The first thing to say is that the problem hasn't 
recurred. I have also borrowed a netbook, and set up Skype on it, so now I can 
run the netbook and my laptop next to each other.

Short story - perhaps this was a wild goose chase; there doesn't seem to be any 
interaction of the kind I was suspecting.  Either there was something odd going 
on with my son's computer (possible - he's a developer) or it was just one of 
those things. 

I suppose I was thinking about port conflict, but didn't know how Skype acted: 
the link you sent was helpful, Svein, so were your comments, Reinier. I am very 
confident it wasn't a CPU/memory resource issue - my laptop was performing 
normally in every other respect; I had Firefox open at the same time and that 
didn't show any reduction in performance.

Reinier wrote:
Try running a tool like Sysinternals TCPView and then start up your
application. Does it start listening on ports, possibly blocking inbound
connections (if you have listening ports open to the internet at all,
which you didn't mention).

Monitor CPU/memory usage and see what happens.

Try calling the Skype echo service while your application is running.

Try calling somebody again on Skype and let people call you while the
application is running.

I haven't had time to try TCPView yet, but I will, just out of interest. Over 
the next few days I'll double-check with your other suggestions in as many 
combinations as possible, but I'll only report back if I find anything definite 
and repeatable.

Again, thanks to you both.

Rob



Re: [firebird-support] Help required

2012-08-01 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi,

  Could you please let me know what is the equivalent of varbinary( max)
  of  SQL  datatype  in Firebird.

 In general, BLOB with an appropriate sub-type.

I'd rather say varchar(max) character set octets, unless max is between 32K and 
64K. In that case you need a BLOB in Firebird, whereas MySQL supports 
(var)chars up to 64K.

Cheers,
Paul Vinkenoog


[firebird-support] Re: FB Silent install Exe

2012-08-01 Thread Allan Fernandes
I am extremely sorry. Today the command 
Firebird-2.0.3.12981-1-Win32.exe /SILENT ...
is working as it is supposed to. I have no idea what went wrong yesterday.
Again sorry for wasting your time.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[firebird-support] matrix report

2012-08-01 Thread mahdoom_a
Dear all, 

I need your help to create this report 

AQNOJan   Feb   Mar   Apr  May  Jun  Jul..Dec.  Total_paid
---   ---   ---   ---  ---  ---  ---  -----
10012000  2000  2000  2000   8000
CHQNO   214   215216   217  


it will fill the amount(PAYMNT) in each month (PAYDATE) and its cheque number 
(CHQNO)






table structure is 


CREATE TABLE RNTSTAT (
STATNO INTEGER NOT NULL,
RNTDUE DOUBLE PRECISION,
DUEDATEDATE,
PAYMNT DOUBLE PRECISION,
PAYTYP VARCHAR(30),
CHQNO  VARCHAR(30),
PAYDATEDATE,
INVOICEVARCHAR(30),
EXPNS  DOUBLE PRECISION,
XPNSDATE   DATE,
XPENSTYP   VARCHAR(30),
MENAINTYP  VARCHAR(30),
CHRGVALDOUBLE PRECISION,
CHRGTYPVARCHAR(30),
RNTNO  INTEGER,
EXNSNO INTEGER,
AQNO   INTEGER,
PANNO  INTEGER,
CONTNO VARCHAR(30),
CHRGPERFLOAT,
FROM_DATE  DATE,
TO_DATEDATE,
AWQAFNONEW_DOMAIN
);


any hint will be helpful.

thanks  regards,

AHMAD



RES: [firebird-support] Re: How to list the tables and field wich use the primary key from one table as FK

2012-08-01 Thread harveypekkar
Thank you , I will also try to verify memory ( I know memtest , it's efficient 
the difficulty is that I am not behind the server but distant and it eed also 
to be run before Windows , not easy for my client ) .
But I think memory is not the problem for all , and after a repair the base 
usually work normally , if there was a memory problem the corruption would come 
back certainly and I would see some instability on the machien too , for now I 
have no case like that .
Have a nice day , regards ,

--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Fabiano fabianoaspro@... wrote:

 Try a program named memtest86
 
 It runs at system startup and detects defective memory modules. 
 
 As you have minor corruption problems it appears to be a memory problem.
 
  
 
 Maybe a F8 in windows initialization have a memory test program too.
 
  
 
 De: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] Em nome de harveypekkar
 Enviada em: terça-feira, 31 de julho de 2012 10:33
 Para: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
 Assunto: [firebird-support] Re: How to list the tables and field wich use
 the primary key from one table as FK
 
  
 
   
 
 Very nice ! the script list exactly what I need , thank you very much .
 About the influence about dev team I agree too , but they keep saying that
 the corruption problem do not come from update or new script , another
 problem is that our new deployement system work with patch , before we did
 backup/restore for each major update , that was a little constraint but
 there was less errors , at least corruption problem were discover before
 going too big .
 I hope to find someday the cause of corruption with no doubt about it source
 , for now i am not experienced enough to do this , I keep working on my
 repair tool and after that maybe I will find out why .
 
 Many thank for your help and Alan too , have a nice day .
 regards , 
 
 --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:firebird-support%40yahoogroups.com , Svein Erling Tysvær
 svein.erling.tysvaer@ wrote:
 
  I think you are 100 % right , the problem is that i am not working in the
 developpement team but in customer 
  support , I suspect some software update to cause the problem but I have
 no access on that , the only thing I can 
  do is to try to repair the best way for my client and I can't only
 validate and mend , I have also to put back the 
  records from a backup with new ID or the problem will not be solve
 completely .
  
  We have about 500 servers too, the structure is from 2 up to 20 clients ,
 little workgroup under windows XP and 7
  
  I don't think the problem concern the firebird side , I know it's very
 strenght.
  
  You also ought to try to influence your development team somehow.
 Normally, it would not be OK for you to have 100 corruptions (assuming an
 average of 2 per week) when Alan hasn't experienced any corruption at all.
 Hardware problems and faulty UDFs used to be ways to make Firebird fail.
  
  The following may or may not help you:
  
  select i.rdb$relation_name, iseg.rdb$field_name
  from rdb$relation_constraints rec
  join rdb$ref_constraints rfc on rec.rdb$constraint_name =
 rfc.rdb$constraint_name
  join rdb$relation_constraints rec2 on rfc.rdb$const_name_uq =
 rec2.rdb$constraint_name
  join rdb$index_segments iseg2 on rec2.rdb$index_name =
 iseg2.rdb$index_name
  join rdb$indices i2 on rec2.rdb$index_name = i2.rdb$index_name
  join rdb$indices i on rec.rdb$index_name = i.rdb$index_name
  join rdb$index_segments iseg on rec.rdb$index_name = iseg.rdb$index_name
  where i2.rdb$relation_name = :MyTableName
  and iseg2.rdb$field_name = :MyPKFieldName
  
  It is not tested, I know it does prepare and that it is possible to get
 some results, but I don't know if they are correct or complete (I'm assuming
 one field for each primary key).
  
  HTH,
  Set
 
 
 
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Re: [firebird-support] matrix report

2012-08-01 Thread Alexandre Benson Smith
Em 1/8/2012 08:23, mahdoom_a escreveu:
 Dear all,

 I need your help to create this report

 AQNOJan   Feb   Mar   Apr  May  Jun  Jul..Dec.  Total_paid
 ---   ---   ---   ---  ---  ---  ---  -----
 10012000  2000  2000  2000   8000
 CHQNO   214   215216   217


 it will fill the amount(PAYMNT) in each month (PAYDATE) and its cheque number 
 (CHQNO)






 table structure is


 CREATE TABLE RNTSTAT (
  STATNO INTEGER NOT NULL,
  RNTDUE DOUBLE PRECISION,
  DUEDATEDATE,
  PAYMNT DOUBLE PRECISION,
  PAYTYP VARCHAR(30),
  CHQNO  VARCHAR(30),
  PAYDATEDATE,
  INVOICEVARCHAR(30),
  EXPNS  DOUBLE PRECISION,
  XPNSDATE   DATE,
  XPENSTYP   VARCHAR(30),
  MENAINTYP  VARCHAR(30),
  CHRGVALDOUBLE PRECISION,
  CHRGTYPVARCHAR(30),
  RNTNO  INTEGER,
  EXNSNO INTEGER,
  AQNO   INTEGER,
  PANNO  INTEGER,
  CONTNO VARCHAR(30),
  CHRGPERFLOAT,
  FROM_DATE  DATE,
  TO_DATEDATE,
  AWQAFNONEW_DOMAIN
 );


 any hint will be helpful.

 thanks  regards,

 AHMAD




I would usually do this on the client-side, it's called cross-tab report.

You could implement it on the server-side using sub-queries, in-line 
views or CTE's.

I would post a sample query that I used on a talk I did last July on 
Firebird Developers Day to show how to use CTE's

with
ProdutoVendaAnual(Ano, ProdutoID, TotalVendido) as
(select
extract(year from DataEntrega) Ano, ProdutoID,
Sum(QuantidadeOriginal)
 from
PedidoVendaItem
 group by
   1, 2)
select
P.Codigo, P.Descricao,
V_2006.TotalVendido, V_2007.TotalVendido,
V_2008.TotalVendido, V_2009.TotalVendido
from
Produto P left join
ProdutoVendaAnual V_2006 on (V_2006.ProdutoID = P.ProdutoID and 
V_2006.Ano = 2006) left join
ProdutoVendaAnual V_2007 on (V_2007.ProdutoID = P.ProdutoID and 
V_2007.Ano = 2007) left join
ProdutoVendaAnual V_2008 on (V_2008.ProdutoID = P.ProdutoID and 
V_2008.Ano = 2008) left join
ProdutoVendaAnual V_2009 on (V_2009.ProdutoID = P.ProdutoID and 
V_2009.Ano = 2009)

HTH


[firebird-support] Firebird 2.5 performance slower then 2.1 especially SuperClassic...

2012-08-01 Thread randallsell
Hello all,

I recently upgraded FB from 2.1.5 to 2.5.1. In order to port data we 
essentially write the contents of the database to a file, then read it back in 
again. In short, this amounts to many thousands of INSERT statements. (Yes I 
know how to use GBak, this process was designed to make metadata mods easy).

Anyway, this process has been working nicely for many years, and I expected 
that the performance of 2.5 would be more or less on par with 2.1, possibly 
better (SMP, SuperClassic). But it isn't. In fact it ranges from 25% worse to 
4x worse (400%). So I thought I'd raise the issue. I'm sure a bunch of 
nay-sayers will argue that my tests are invalid, blah blah. But rest assured I 
ran my tests many times over on the same machine to ensure the results are 
accurate. And the only things varied in the tests were the backend server 
version / architecture / Forced-Writes. Front-end app and import file always 
the same.

Here are the results of the import runs:

FB 2.1.5 SuperServer Force-Writes Off 3 min 40 sec
FB 2.1.5 SuperServer Force-Writes On 7 min 15 sec

FB 2.5.1 SuperServer Force-Writes Off 4 min 30 sec
FB 2.5.1 SuperServer Force-Writes On NOT TESTED

FB 2.5.1 SuperClassic Force-Writes Off 17 min 35 sec
FB 2.5.1 SuperClassic Force-Writes On 20 minutes 4 seconds

So a pure upgrade from 2.1 to 2.5 (same SuperServer architecture) made the 
process 25% slower (looking at Forced Writes Off only). The real killer above 
is the new SuperClassic architecture. OK sure this test should have absoluely 
no benefit from SuperClassic since it is a single threaded app throwing INSERT 
statements to the server. But over 4x worse performance?!?! That's a serious 
performance hit!

FWIW, the firebird.conf is the same for all test cases (well the same less 
changes made between 2.1 and 2.5). The critical settings (modified from their 
default values) are these:

CpuAffinityMask = 7
MaxUnflushedWrites = 200
MaxUnflushedWriteTime = 10

Has anyone else experienced performance degredation with FB 2.5? Although I 
would love to take advantage of some of the new features of 2.5, the poor 
performance has me going back to 2.1 for now.

regards,
-randall sell



[firebird-support] Re: Firebird 2.5 performance slower then 2.1 especially SuperClassic...

2012-08-01 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
01.08.2012 19:40, randallsell wrote:

 Has anyone else experienced performance degredation with FB 2.5?

This may explain your experience:
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3792


Dmitry




Re: [firebird-support] Recursive query (get all employees under master department)

2012-08-01 Thread Newbie
this is exactly what I needed. Thank you :)


 If what you're asking is what I think, then the answer is very simple:

 (same CTE as you already have)

 SELECT * FROM fs_tree fs
 JOIN employee e on fs.dept_id = e.dept_id

 Of course, you could also put this in the CTE itself (then you might 
 have to do it both before and after UNION ALL), but you haven't 
 mentioned any employee recursion (e.g. list all employees whose 
 leaders or their leaders belong to the department, regardless of 
 whether the employee or his closest leader belong to the department), 
 so there isn't much reason to complicate things.

 HTH,
 Set





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[firebird-support] Re: Firebird 2.5 performance slower then 2.1 especially SuperClassic...

2012-08-01 Thread randallsell


--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Dmitry Yemanov dimitr@... wrote:

 01.08.2012 19:40, randallsell wrote:
 
  Has anyone else experienced performance degredation with FB 2.5?
 
 This may explain your experience:
 http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3792
 
 
 Dmitry


Possibly. Although I am noticing far worse then a 50% loss. But shall retest 
when 2.5.2 is publicly available. Got a rough idea when that might be?

regards,
-randall



Re: [firebird-support] Saving / Retreving Chinese chrs from database

2012-08-01 Thread Michael Ludwig
Andy Gable schrieb am 26.07.2012 um 03:21 (+0100):

   KITCHENDESCRIPTION_ENGVARCHAR(40),
 
   KITCHENDESCRIPTION_OTHER  VARCHAR(100) CHARACTER SET UTF8,

 (programming language VB6 and interface is ODBC)

 I can display when adding a new product the Chinese chars but when I
 recall it from the database I get 

My guess: Some buffer or whatnot on the way from the character
data column to  is not ready to accept wide characters, so
the replacement character (frequently just the question mark)
is substituted for the real ones. Check your VB6 code.
-- 
Michael Ludwig


[firebird-support] Re: Firebird 2.5 performance slower then 2.1 especially SuperClassic...

2012-08-01 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
02.08.2012 3:14, randallsell wrote:

 Possibly. Although I am noticing far worse then a 50% loss. But shall
 retest when 2.5.2 is publicly available. Got a rough idea when that
 might be?

In a couple of weeks. But you may use a snapshot build for testing.


Dmitry