[firebird-support] Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread michael.vilhelm...@microcom.dk [firebird-support]
Hi
 

 Does GBak behave different on a Classic Server than on a SuperServer regarding 
restore speed?
 

 I ask this, because around 1 year ago I installed Firebird 2.5 SS on a Windows 
environment. 
 Here I did a restore of a 90 Gb DB.
 This took around 8 hours. 
 

 Since then we have switched from SS to Classic due to some performance issues.
 

 The setup runs good.
 

 Now I have 2 times tried to restore the dayly dump file on another folder on 
this very same system.
 Both times I have had to cancel this after 9+ hours where the restore was 
approximatly half way.
 

 I would have expected it to be a little more than 9 hours, since the DB is now 
96 GB.
 

 Michael
 

 

 My system is:
 

  - Windows Server 2012 R2 (64 bit)
  - 4 Core CPU 
  - 32 Gb RAM
  - Firebird 2.5.2.26540 Classic
 

  


Re: [firebird-support] Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
Michael,

 Does GBak behave different on a Classic Server than on a SuperServer regarding
 restore speed?
 
 
 I ask this, because around 1 year ago I installed Firebird 2.5 SS on a Windows
 environment. 
 Here I did a restore of a 90 Gb DB.
 This took around 8 hours. 
 
 
 Since then we have switched from SS to Classic due to some performance issues.
 
 
 The setup runs good.
 
 
 Now I have 2 times tried to restore the dayly dump file on another folder on
 this very same system.
 Both times I have had to cancel this after 9+ hours where the restore was
 approximatly half way.
 
 
 I would have expected it to be a little more than 9 hours, since the DB is now
 96 GB.

* What is the page buffers value at database level? (gstat -h)
* How does your gbak restore call look like?


--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com

Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.



[firebird-support] Re: Cross database update

2014-11-17 Thread masb...@za-management.com [firebird-support]
Dear Thomas,
thank you for your answer. I have experienced that pssing by the trigger is 
functioning well. 

The only thing wrong is that the loop has no effect on the data of the records. 
And I hoped that someone could check the statement syntaxwise. Maybe I am doing 
something wrong in my logic.

Is the use of the for select do loop correct as stated? Maybe I have to use an 
update or insert statement except?

Thanks again for any input.
Kind regards
Christian

[firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread michael.vilhelm...@microcom.dk [firebird-support]
* What is the page buffers value at database level? (gstat -h) 
E:\DB\Kaufmannc:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_2_5\bin\gstat.exe localhost:
 e:\db\Kaufmann\OCCEasyPos.FDB -h
 

 Database e:\db\Kaufmann\OCCEasyPos.FDB
 Database header page information:
 Flags   0
 Checksum12345
 Generation  101077117
 Page size   4096
 ODS version 11.2
 Oldest transaction  96356704
 Oldest active   96356705
 Oldest snapshot 96356705
 Next transaction96384172
 Bumped transaction  1
 Sequence number 0
 Next attachment ID  4930121
 Implementation ID   26
 Shadow count0
 Page buffers2048
 Next header page0
 Database dialect1
 Creation date   Nov 11, 2013 23:47:15
 Attributes  force write
 

 Variable header data:
 Sweep interval: 0
 *END*
 

 E:\DB\Kaufmann
 

 


 

 

 
* How does your gbak restore call look like?

 GBak -C -User %1 -Pas %2 G:\FBDump\OCCEasyPos.fbk 
LocalHost:F:\DB\Kaufmann\Uddannelse\OCCEasyPos.fdb -v -rep -o 
-FIX_FSS_METADATA ISO8859_1 -fix_fss_data ISO8859_1 -y 
G:\FBDump\RestoreEasyPos.txt
 


 

 



RE: [firebird-support] Re: Cross database update

2014-11-17 Thread Svein Erling Tysvær svein.erling.tysv...@kreftregisteret.no [firebird-support]
Dear Thomas,
thank you for your answer. I have experienced that pssing by the trigger is 
functioning well.

The only thing wrong is that the loop has no effect on the data of the 
records. And I hoped that someone could check the statement syntaxwise. Maybe 
I am doing something wrong in my logic.

Is the use of the for select do loop correct as stated? Maybe I have to use an 
update or insert statement except?

Your FOR..SELECT seems fine, what’s unknown to us (proprietary to IB Expert) is 
the ibeblock and the use of two separate connections (Firebird does support 
transactions spanning several connections as well as ON EXTERNAL, but not 
treating two connections as something you can mix inside a stored procedure).

I think your error is in your execute block and that you either have to 
explicitly pass values or declare variables as input parameters in your execute 
block. Take a look at 
http://www.firebirdsql.org/refdocs/langrefupd20-execblock.html.
Moreover, I’d recommend trying to get some kind of error message rather than 
having no code in the EXCEPT block (hiding things from the user may be OK, it 
is normally not what you want when you have a problem puzzling you).

HTH,
Set


Re: [firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
Hello Michael,

 * What is the page buffers value at database level? (gstat -h)
 E:\DB\Kaufmannc:\Program Files\Firebird\Firebird_2_5\bin\gstat.exe
 localhost:
 e:\db\Kaufmann\OCCEasyPos.FDB -h
 
 
 Database e:\db\Kaufmann\OCCEasyPos.FDB
 Database header page information:
 Flags   0
 Checksum12345
 Generation  101077117
 Page size   4096
 ODS version 11.2
 Oldest transaction  96356704
 Oldest active   96356705
 Oldest snapshot 96356705
 Next transaction96384172
 Bumped transaction  1
 Sequence number 0
 Next attachment ID  4930121
 Implementation ID   26
 Shadow count0
 Page buffers2048
 Next header page0
 Database dialect1
 Creation date   Nov 11, 2013 23:47:15
 Attributes  force write
 
 
 Variable header data:
 Sweep interval: 0
 *END*

Ok, so at least you are not running with a page buffers value of 0 which maps 
to a default value in firebird.conf of 75 for CS/SC.

Beside your gbak restore issue, your counters here show some interesting 
throughput numbers, when taking the creation date of the database into account:

~ 170 transactions / sec
~ 9 connections / sec

Especially opening 9 physical connections per second sounds a bit like a design 
flaw adding unnecessary overhead.

And a 96GB database with a page size of 4K might result in index depth  3 for 
larger tables.


 E:\DB\Kaufmann
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 * How does your gbak restore call look like?
 
 GBak -C -User %1 -Pas %2 G:\FBDump\OCCEasyPos.fbk
 LocalHost:F:\DB\Kaufmann\Uddannelse\OCCEasyPos.fdb -v -rep -o
 -FIX_FSS_METADATA ISO8859_1 -fix_fss_data ISO8859_1 -y
 G:\FBDump\RestoreEasyPos.txt

- Any special reason that you use both -FIX* options everytime for the restore?
- Where is the restore process stuck? Probably while creating indexes?
- I would seriously look into running gbak for both, backup and restore through 
the Services Manager. Check out the -se option

Just some hints, but I don't have a real answer for your SS vs. SC issue.


--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com

Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.



Re: [firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread michael.vilhelm...@microcom.dk [firebird-support]
Beside your gbak restore issue, your counters here show some interesting 
throughput numbers, when taking the creation date of the database into account:

~ 170 transactions / sec
~ 9 connections / sec
 

 

 We have a external connection from a WEBStore. 
 Whatever they do, they connect and disconnect every second, do a start 
transaction and commit. 
 I have a case with them, where I would like them to stop this, but so far 
without success.
 

 

 

 

 

 - Any special reason that you use both -FIX* options everytime for the restore?
 Left over from restoring from 1.5 to 2.1 - havn't deleted them yet :)
 

 

 
- Where is the restore process stuck? Probably while creating indexes?
 No - both times I have seen this, its during ordinary restore and before 
index. 
 I am still trying to find out why this is. 
 

 

 
- I would seriously look into running gbak for both, backup and restore through 
the Services Manager. Check out the -se option

 Hmm - whats this?
 

 



[firebird-support] Re: Cross database update

2014-11-17 Thread masb...@za-management.com [firebird-support]
Hi Set,
thank you very much for the input. 
I will rework the block part and reply afterwards.

Kind regards
Christian

Re: [firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
 Isnt the transaction per second wrongly calculated? 

Oops, sorry!!! I have been one year off by using 2014 instead of 2013.


--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com

Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.



 DB is created november 2013.
 Approcimatly 365 days ago.
 Transaction is at 96.356.705.
 
 
 Per day is approx: 263.990
 Per hour: 10.999
 Per minut: 183.
 Per second: 3
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread 'Walter R. Ojeda Valiente' sistemas2000profesio...@gmail.com [firebird-support]
Hmmm, database dialect is 1.

No issues with that?

Greetings.

Walter.


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:41 AM, 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:



  Isnt the transaction per second wrongly calculated?

 Oops, sorry!!! I have been one year off by using 2014 instead of 2013.

 --
 With regards,
 Thomas Steinmaurer
 http://www.upscene.com

 Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
 FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.

  DB is created november 2013.
  Approcimatly 365 days ago.
  Transaction is at 96.356.705.
 
 
  Per day is approx: 263.990
  Per hour: 10.999
  Per minut: 183.
  Per second: 3
 
 
 
 
 

  



Re: [firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread michael.vilhelm...@microcom.dk [firebird-support]
Hmmm, database dialect is 1.
 

 

 No, not really.
 It was originally created as Dialect 1 back in 1998. 
 It has never been changed, it works and as a matter of fact I'm not sure what 
happens if the dialect is changed...


[firebird-support] Re: Firebird on Mac

2014-11-17 Thread Philippe Makowski pmakow...@ibphoenix.fr [firebird-support]
Le 14/11/14 21:04, 'William, David' david.will...@espn.com
[firebird-support] a écrit :

 The installation process runs ok. But whenever I try to start the
 server

Firebird should start at every boot

some informations :

http://paulbeachsblog.blogspot.fr/2008/03/where-is-libfbclientdylib-on-macosx.html

http://paulbeachsblog.blogspot.fr/2008/02/firebird-and-macosx-uninstalls.html

you can also disable or enable Firebird classic using launchctl

$sudo launchctl unload /Library/LaunchDemons/org.firebird.gds.plist
$sudo launchctl load  /Library/LaunchDemons/org.firebird.gds.plist


and for Superserver :
/Library/StartupItems/Firebird/Firebird start
/Library/StartupItems/Firebird/Firebird stop



Re: [firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread 'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
Hello Michael,

 Beside your gbak restore issue, your counters here show some interesting
 throughput numbers, when taking the creation date of the database into 
 account:
 
 ~ 170 transactions / sec
 ~ 9 connections / sec
 
 
 
 
 We have a external connection from a WEBStore. 
 Whatever they do, they connect and disconnect every second, do a start
 transaction and commit. 
 I have a case with them, where I would like them to stop this, but so far
 without success.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - Any special reason that you use both -FIX* options everytime for the 
 restore?
 Left over from restoring from 1.5 to 2.1 - havn't deleted them yet :)
 
 
 
 
 
 - Where is the restore process stuck? Probably while creating indexes?
 No - both times I have seen this, its during ordinary restore and before 
 index.
 
 I am still trying to find out why this is. 
 
 
 
 
 
 - I would seriously look into running gbak for both, backup and restore 
 through
 the Services Manager. Check out the -se option
 
 Hmm - whats this?

By using the Firebird services manager you basically tell the server to 
initiate and run the restore on the server which results in bypassing the TCP 
stack.

So, your original restore call:

GBak -C -User %1 -Pas %2 G:\FBDump\OCCEasyPos.fbk 
LocalHost:F:\DB\Kaufmann\Uddannelse\OCCEasyPos.fdb -v -rep -o 
-FIX_FSS_METADATA ISO8859_1 -fix_fss_data ISO8859_1 -y 
G:\FBDump\RestoreEasyPos.txt

Could be transformed to something like:

gbak -C -User %1 -Pas %2 -service localhost:service_mgr 
G:\FBDump\OCCEasyPos.fbk F:\DB\Kaufmann\Uddannelse\OCCEasyPos.fdb -v -o -y 
G:\FBDump\RestoreEasyPos.txt

So the difference is that you don't provide the host name (localhost) in the 
resulting database path but through the -service option. If both, the backup 
and the restored database file is on the same server, using the -service option 
is the fastest way. The same goes for a backup as well.

From your origingal gbak restore call, I have also removed the -rep option, 
because a faulty restore will trash the overwritten restored database and the 
FIX* options as well.

Regards,
Thomas


Re: [firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread Robert martin r...@chreos.com [firebird-support]
i

 * How does your gbak restore call look like?
 GBak -C -User %1 -Pas %2 G:\FBDump\OCCEasyPos.fbk
 LocalHost:F:\DB\Kaufmann\Uddannelse\OCCEasyPos.fdb -v -rep -o
 -FIX_FSS_METADATA ISO8859_1 -fix_fss_data ISO8859_1 -y G:\FBDump\
 ;RestoreEasyPos.txt




Have you tried it with the -G flag.  This disables garbage collection, 
which can make backups run much faster.  Obviously if you need / want to 
do the garbage collection this isn't an option but if it works much 
faster it gives you a hit as to what the issue might be :)

Cheers
Rob



Re: [firebird-support] Re: Gbak Restore - SuperServer vs. SuperClassic

2014-11-17 Thread Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support]

i

 * How does your gbak restore call look like?
 GBak -C -User %1 -Pas %2 G:\FBDump\OCCEasyPos.fbk
 LocalHost:F:\DB\Kaufmann\Uddannelse\OCCEasyPos.fdb -v -rep -o
 -FIX_FSS_METADATA ISO8859_1 -fix_fss_data ISO8859_1 -y G:\FBDump\
 ;RestoreEasyPos.txt



At 09:03 a.m. 18/11/2014, Robert martin r...@chreos.com [firebird-support] 
wrote:

Have you tried it with the -G flag.  This disables garbage collection, 
which can make backups run much faster.  Obviously if you need / want to 
do the garbage collection this isn't an option but if it works much 
faster it gives you a hit as to what the issue might be :)

OP is complaining of a slow restore.  It makes no difference to the restore, 
whether the backup was made with or without the -g flag.

But it's good advice to use the -g flag for a BACKUP that is going to be 
restored right away, since the original database is going to be dropped, 
anyway, garbage-and-all.


Helen Borrie, Support Consultant, IBPhoenix (Pacific)
Author of The Firebird Book and The Firebird Book Second Edition
http://www.firebird-books.net
__