Re: [firebird-support] secondary server attachments cannot validate databases during gfix
Hi Adam, gfix does not validate databases online till 2.5.4. Update 250 to 255 and try again, or perform recovery operations in exclusive mode. Use these sequence to repair https://ib-aid.com/en/articles/how-to-repair-a-corrupt-firebird-database/ Regards, Alexey Kovyazin IBSurgeon www.ib-aid.com Hello Group, I have a server running Firebird 2.5.0 in Classic mode on Windows. There is a database that appears corrupted (internal Firebird consistency check ...). I have got all users out and renamed the file and attempted: gfix -v localhost:C:\data\corrupt.fdb -user sysdba -password masterke It is failing with the following message: bad parameters on attach or create database -secondary server attachments cannot validate databases Using Process Explorer, I can see that there are no other processes with a handle to this file. (It is also renamed, and the clients are pointing at the alias which doesn't presently exist) I suspect that whatever the corruption is, it is confusing gfix into believing that there are other active connections. Is there a way around this? Thanks Adam
[firebird-support] secondary server attachments cannot validate databases during gfix
Hello Group, I have a server running Firebird 2.5.0 in Classic mode on Windows. There is a database that appears corrupted (internal Firebird consistency check ...). I have got all users out and renamed the file and attempted: gfix -v localhost:C:\data\corrupt.fdb -user sysdba -password masterke It is failing with the following message: bad parameters on attach or create database -secondary server attachments cannot validate databases Using Process Explorer, I can see that there are no other processes with a handle to this file. (It is also renamed, and the clients are pointing at the alias which doesn't presently exist) I suspect that whatever the corruption is, it is confusing gfix into believing that there are other active connections. Is there a way around this? Thanks Adam
Re: [firebird-support] Re: UDF install in FB3.0 RC2
Ah, I did not know that Karol. I'll try this after the UDF problem has been solved. Russell
Re: [firebird-support] FB3 RC2 error with Flamerobin
On 9-3-2016 17:05, 'esdonisgarcia' esdonisgar...@sisconge.hol.es [firebird-support] wrote: >> On 6-3-2016 17:55, 'esdonisgarcia' esdonisgar...@sisconge.hol.es >> [firebird-support] wrote: >>> You can use a Flamerobin with FB3 RC2? >> >> Yes you can, but you need to make sure that you either use the >> libfbclient.so of Firebird 3, or that you set the encryption setting to >> Enabled (or Disabled) instead of the default of Required. > > Property that must change? See the Firebird 3 release notes section "Legacy Authentication" on page 125, or better yet: just use the Firebird 3 fbclient.dll. Mark -- Mark Rotteveel
Re: AW: AW: [firebird-support] coalesce bug in fb 3.0 rc2?
Hello, > your are right. But in FB 3, it will be handled different. > I need the left join tlager_sum, because I’d like to have all records too > there no records in tlager_sum. > But in this case I get now in fb 3 the tteile.teilenr clean without the > amaount of tlager_sum (the a.minb is greater than the coalesce(b.menge,0) > and in this case, I get no referenced Record from tlager_sum), the one > from tteile now in every case (left join). > Finally, I would get all records with a.minb > b.menge and all records, > where a.minb is present an there is no record from the teilenr in > tlager_sum. Please, give some DDL with example data. I've tried to reproduce your issue on FB3.0 RC2, but i could not reproduce it. Kind Regards, Arno Brinkman
Re: [firebird-support] AW: different behavior firebird 3.0 RC2
09.03.2016 12:18, 'Checkmail' check_m...@satron.de [firebird-support] wrote: > the trigger is required because the user can delete the one record, in this > case the > trigger deletes the referenced too. But if I delete the entire Order, the > record will be > delete twice. How can I solve this in fb 3? Put a ticket with testcase into tracker. -- WBR, SD. ++ Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Documentation item on the main (top) menu. Try FAQ and other links from the left-side menu there. Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com/resources/documents/ ++ Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: firebird-support-dig...@yahoogroups.com firebird-support-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: firebird-support-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to: https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
[firebird-support] AW: different behavior firebird 3.0 RC2
One hint, the trigger is required because the user can delete the one record, in this case the trigger deletes the referenced too. But if I delete the entire Order, the record will be delete twice. How can I solve this in fb 3? Von: Checkmail [mailto:check_m...@satron.de] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. März 2016 11:53 An: 'firebird-support@yahoogroups.com' (firebird-support@yahoogroups.com) Betreff: different behavior firebird 3.0 RC2 Hello again, now I have in FB3 a problem. A stored Procedure should delete some records. ID some fields ID_AUTOINSERT 123xxx null 234 xxx null 255 xxx 266 266 xxx null Now there is a trigger after delete in this table who deletes: if(old.ap = 69) then begin delete from tplan_kw_pos where id_autoinsert = old.id; end In this case, FB will delete the record with ID 266 during deleting ID 255 and the other statement intends to delete the record 266 too. Now in FB 3 RC 2 I get this error message: can't format message 13:492 -- message file C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\firebird.msg not found. no current record for fetch operation. In FB 2.55, FB2.1 this was not a problem. How can I fix? Thanks
[firebird-support] different behavior firebird 3.0 RC2
Hello again, now I have in FB3 a problem. A stored Procedure should delete some records. ID some fields ID_AUTOINSERT 123xxx null 234 xxx null 255 xxx 266 266 xxx null Now there is a trigger after delete in this table who deletes: if(old.ap = 69) then begin delete from tplan_kw_pos where id_autoinsert = old.id; end In this case, FB will delete the record with ID 266 during deleting ID 255 and the other statement intends to delete the record 266 too. Now in FB 3 RC 2 I get this error message: can't format message 13:492 -- message file C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\firebird.msg not found. no current record for fetch operation. In FB 2.55, FB2.1 this was not a problem. How can I fix? Thanks
AW: AW: [firebird-support] coalesce bug in fb 3.0 rc2?
Hello, your are right. But in FB 3, it will be handled different. I need the left join tlager_sum, because I’d like to have all records too there no records in tlager_sum. But in this case I get now in fb 3 the tteile.teilenr clean without the amaount of tlager_sum (the a.minb is greater than the coalesce(b.menge,0) and in this case, I get no referenced Record from tlager_sum), the one from tteile now in every case (left join). Finally, I would get all records with a.minb > b.menge and all records, where a.minb is present an there is no record from the teilenr in tlager_sum. Thanks Von: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. März 2016 09:04 An: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Betreff: Re: AW: [firebird-support] coalesce bug in fb 3.0 rc2? Hello, > sorry, outlook corrects me in German. At the moment, I have no sulution > for the problem. Anything ideas? Query: SELECT a.teilenr, a.bezeichnung, a.minb, coalesce(b.menge,0) as m, a.typ FROM tteile a left join tlager_sum b on (a.teilenr = b.teilenr) WHERE ((a.minb > coalesce(b.menge,0)) and (a.typ = 1)) ORDER BY a.teilenr Result: TEILENR BEZEICHNUNG MINB M TYP PrSt110x44x3 Profilrohr E235,S2 110x44x3,0 mm gebeizt 5600mm 280 420 1 I would say your TLAGER_SUM contains a record with: TEILENR MENGE PrSt110x44x3 420 So results are correct? If not give sample records for tteile and tlager_sum with DDL Kind Regards, Arno Brinkman ABVisie
Re: [firebird-support] Re: UDF install in FB3.0 RC2
>>However on this server I first installed FB3 RC2 (64) and saw my database >>managers were 32 bit so I uninstalled FB3 (64) Russell ___ Hi, you can use Firebird 64 bit with 32 bit applications - only fbclient.dll must be 32 bit then regards, Karol Bieniaszewski
Re: [firebird-support] How write a query with a progressive sum field
Hallo, Il 08/03/2016 20.36, setysvar setys...@gmail.com [firebird-support] ha scritto: > This will not work properly if more than one row of DC are joined to > the same DT (but then your ORDER BY isn't 100% deterministic). If you > change the ordering of your query, you also have to change the > subselect (e.g. if you add DESC you have to change from > to <). If > this doesn't fit, is too slow or too difficult to understand, I'd > recommend EXECUTE BLOCK (as Sean already wrote). HTH, Thank You, the query suggested works but because of the primary index of DOC_TESTA the value calculated of SALDO is not compliant with the result of the rows of the query. I solved by creating a stored procedure like this: AS BEGIN SALDO = 0; FOR SELECT DT.DATA, DT.DOCUMENTO_ID, DT.NUMERO, DT.SERIE, DC.CARICO, DC.SCARICO, DC.CARICO - DC.SCARICO + :SALDO, from DOC_TESTA DT JOIN DOC_CORPO DC on DT.ID = DC.DOC_TESTA_ID WHERE DC.ARTICOLO_ID = :ID ORDER BY DT.DATA, DT.DOCUMENTO_ID, DT.NUMERO, DT.SERIE INTO :DATADOCUMENTO, :DOCUMENTO_ID, :NUMERO, :SERIE, :CARICO, :SCARICO, :SALDO, DO SUSPEND; END^ Thanks to all :) -- Luigi Siciliano -- ++ Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Documentation item on the main (top) menu. Try FAQ and other links from the left-side menu there. Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com/resources/documents/ ++ Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: firebird-support-dig...@yahoogroups.com firebird-support-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: firebird-support-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to: https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
[firebird-support] Re: UDF install in FB3.0 RC2
Thank you Dimitry for the hint. Using DatabaseWorkbench I instruct the server in which FB3 is installed to use fbclient.dll that comes with FB3. So I am using the this fbClient.dll with all databases I am testing with FB3. The freeUDFLib.dll file is working fine with FB2.5.x on another server. I am using FB3(32) on a distinct server, having no other FB engine on the server with FB3(32) on it. However on this server I first installed FB3 RC2 (64) and saw my database managers were 32 bit so I uninstalled FB3 (64). After seeing the errors I am having I wondered if some residue was left from FB3(64)? I deleted the "Firebird" folder for "program files" where FB3(64) was installed. I looked in the registry for "firebird" and saw nothings suspicious, but I am not competent to assess this residue question. Russell
Re: AW: [firebird-support] coalesce bug in fb 3.0 rc2?
Hello, > sorry, outlook corrects me in German. At the moment, I have no sulution > for the problem. Anything ideas? Query: SELECT a.teilenr, a.bezeichnung, a.minb, coalesce(b.menge,0) as m, a.typ FROM tteile a left join tlager_sum b on (a.teilenr = b.teilenr) WHERE ((a.minb > coalesce(b.menge,0)) and (a.typ = 1)) ORDER BY a.teilenr Result: TEILENRBEZEICHNUNGMINB M TYP PrSt110x44x3 Profilrohr E235,S2 110x44x3,0 mm gebeizt 5600mm280 420 1 I would say your TLAGER_SUM contains a record with: TEILENRMENGE PrSt110x44x3420 So results are correct? If not give sample records for tteile and tlager_sum with DDL Kind Regards, Arno Brinkman ABVisie
Re: [firebird-support] Re: UDF install in FB3.0 RC2
Thanks for suggestions Karol. I am using Win 10 (64) and FB3 (32). All DLLs are 32 bit, assessed by looking in the DLL files. Russell ,___ I know that this is not so helpfull - byt you do not need to use external functions to extract year or others it exists in firebird itself EXTRACT(YEAR FROM DATE_FIELD) Look into README.builtin_functions.txt To fix problems - look at Dmitry answer regards, Karol Bieniaszewski
