[firebird-support] Re: database in external USB HDD

2012-07-05 Thread trskopo
  2) Pen Drive : more compact.
 
 
 Welcome to our recovery service :)

Yes, Pen Drive is really not reliable, prepare to lost you data if you using 
this media, that why I said USB Hardisk is more reliable compare to Pen Drive :)
 
 
  3) RAM Disk : highest speed but risky and less space. Do not use it 
  unless you aware of the risk. Runs on a dedicated PC (no other 
  programs run on this pc, only database server and OS), backup it 
  everyday, twice a day and have a reliable UPS. Love the speed when 
  doing maintenance (backup/restore) - superb compare to those two.
 
 
 We have tested RAM Disks - no performance advantages found when 
 comparing to the properly tuned Firebird.
 

Strange, I have a sample database that showing the speed  when backup/restore 
in RAM Disk is much more faster compare to disk, about 20 or 30 times faster 
perhaps, may be my Disk is too slow, it is SATA II anyway :)

About performance, assuming same database (one on the RAM and the other on the 
disk), I think it has something to do with database cache memory. If most of 
data can fits in cache memory, of course, no performance gain since both 
processing took place on RAM.

incendio.



[firebird-support] Re: database in external USB HDD

2012-07-04 Thread Sergio
 I use FB 2.01 in external USB drive connected to the server for about 3-4 
 years. No problem at all, I think FB 2.5 won't be a problem too.
 
 Currently, using FB 2.5 on a RAM Disk (in server) for a better speed.

Thanks for the answer!! If memory serves, I think I read somewhere a post from 
Helen Borrie in which she says that is not a good idea... But can't find that 
post now! :(

Thanks again!

sergio




Re: [firebird-support] Re: database in external USB HDD

2012-07-04 Thread Alexandre Benson Smith
Are you sure you are not mixing it with using the database on Pen Drives ?

Em 4/7/2012 19:10, Sergio escreveu:
 I use FB 2.01 in external USB drive connected to the server for about 3-4 
 years. No problem at all, I think FB 2.5 won't be a problem too.

 Currently, using FB 2.5 on a RAM Disk (in server) for a better speed.
 Thanks for the answer!! If memory serves, I think I read somewhere a post 
 from Helen Borrie in which she says that is not a good idea... But can't find 
 that post now! :(

 Thanks again!

 sergio




 

 ++

 Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
 on the main (top) menu.  Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !

 Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com

 ++
 Yahoo! Groups Links








[firebird-support] Re: database in external USB HDD

2012-07-04 Thread Sergio

 Are you sure you are not mixing it with using the database on Pen Drives ?


Hi Alexande! thanks for the answer! 

May be... I'm not sure... But in any case, what would be the difference in 
having the database file on an USB HDD and a Pen Drive?

Or it's just a matter of space or performance?

Sergio



[firebird-support] Re: database in external USB HDD

2012-07-04 Thread trskopo
On my experience :

1) USB HDD : more reliable, more speed and more space.

2) Pen Drive : more compact.

3) RAM Disk : highest speed but risky and less space. Do not use it unless you 
aware of the risk. Runs on a dedicated PC (no other programs run on this pc, 
only database server and OS), backup it everyday, twice a day and have a 
reliable UPS. Love the speed when doing maintenance (backup/restore) - superb 
compare to those two.

Incendio.

--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Sergio shg_sistemas@... wrote:

 
  Are you sure you are not mixing it with using the database on Pen Drives ?
 
 
 Hi Alexande! thanks for the answer! 
 
 May be... I'm not sure... But in any case, what would be the difference in 
 having the database file on an USB HDD and a Pen Drive?
 
 Or it's just a matter of space or performance?
 
 Sergio





Re: [firebird-support] Re: database in external USB HDD

2012-07-04 Thread Alexey Kovyazin
Hello All,

To let you know our opinion (from the point of view as recovery products 
and services company):

 On my experience :

 1) USB HDD : more reliable, more speed and more space.


USDB HDD can be used only for backups. Database should be on RAID1/5/10 
(according to your budget).


 2) Pen Drive : more compact.


Welcome to our recovery service :)


 3) RAM Disk : highest speed but risky and less space. Do not use it 
 unless you aware of the risk. Runs on a dedicated PC (no other 
 programs run on this pc, only database server and OS), backup it 
 everyday, twice a day and have a reliable UPS. Love the speed when 
 doing maintenance (backup/restore) - superb compare to those two.


We have tested RAM Disks - no performance advantages found when 
comparing to the properly tuned Firebird.

With best regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon
www.ib-aid.com




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[firebird-support] Re: database in external USB HDD

2012-07-02 Thread trskopo
I use FB 2.01 in external USB drive connected to the server for about 3-4 
years. No problem at all, I think FB 2.5 won't be a problem too.

Currently, using FB 2.5 on a RAM Disk (in server) for a better speed.

incendio.
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Sergio H. Gonzalez 
shg_sistemas@... wrote:

 Hello there!
 
 I use FB 2.5. Is there any known problem with having the database file 
 in an external USB drive conected to the server?
 Just in case (don't know if it matters!) I always use superserver mode.
 
 thanks!!
 
 -sergio
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]