Bruno:
Theories needs theories do be interpreted, except that we must start from
simple agreements, on elementary arithmetic for example, to exploit that
direction.
End Bruno Begin Karl
Also, we need an agreement what to concentrate on while the communication
is made. We have agreed to use elementary arithmetic as carriers of
meaning, because everyone understands these. What we keep in our abstract
hands is now clear. Now comes the dynamic part: we sort them and resort
them and watch how these move.
If we had some entrepreneurs here, we could have a nice graphic drawn: like
camels building a caravane, the convoys moving together. I would like to
know how many of the FIS work in environments, where logistics and
housekeeping is of importance, like a warehouse manager or a HR
professional. In the business life, people do have experience and practice
with flows of mass thru spatially and temporally fixed "points".
The unit of {change | transfer | dynamism} that can be stipulated over
systems of logistics overall can now be discussed in an abstract fashion,
where every word has a clear meaning. The concept of "goods in transit" can
be introduced by the sorting-resorting method.
There is indeed much darkness in the cave. Maybe some incendiary comments
could set a sparkling discussion and illuminate a torch in light of which
we see the entertaintment on long evenings among the dwellers: let us think
up some moving objects and move them.
End Karl
_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
