Returned mail: Service unavailable
The original message was received at Wed, 9 Sep 1998 20:32:37 -0600 (MDT) from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail.globecomm.net.: >>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <<< 571 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User over hourly mail quota. 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Service unavailable - Original message follows - Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mailing-list.net (8.8.5) id UAA08957; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 20:32:37 -0600 (MDT) Received: by mailing-list.net (bulk_mailer v1.9); Wed, 9 Sep 1998 20:32:37 -0600 Received: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mailing-list.net (8.8.5) id UAA08929; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 20:32:34 -0600 (MDT) Received: from imo14.mx.aol.com (imo14.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.4]) by mailing-list.net (8.8.5) id UAA08900; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 20:32:29 -0600 (MDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by imo14.mx.aol.com (IMOv16.1) id 1VYRa09042 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 22:31:49 +2000 (EDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 22:31:49 EDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Driving Tapes Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Mac sub 84 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I recently purchased a wonderful Fjord gelding. As I learn to drive him I am wondering if anyone has a recommendation for a good beginning driving tape. Thanks!!! Linda Lottie - Minnesota
Driving Tapes
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I recently purchased a wonderful Fjord gelding. As I learn to drive him I am wondering if anyone has a recommendation for a good beginning driving tape. Thanks!!! Linda Lottie - Minnesota
Re: naming the foal
This message is from: Mike May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 12:04 PM 9/8/98 -0400, you wrote: >This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >On Tue, 08 Sep 1998, Mike May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Actually if this is MVF Viola you are talking about then she was not bred >>in Missouri but was actually bred & born in Norway. > >It's MVF Viola, but what I mean, she was bred (to Lendason) in Missouri and I'm >talking about a name for her filly. > Ahhh, Ok. > She was imported by >>Phil Prichard as a 2 year old. She really shouldn't have the MVF in front >>of her name but the registrar at that time decided to put it on all of the >>horses he imported. > >I'm flattered you know all about Viola! So it shouldn't be the purchaser who >gets the prefix, but the owner of dam at time of breeding? I try to know about all of the horses. Of course it is a lot easier when you have the database right in front of you. ;-) Yes it is the owner of dam at time of breeding that gets to use the prefix. The registration # for your filly will start with WS. You don't have to use that in her name though if you don't want to. Mike == Norwegian Fjord Horse Registry Mike May, Registrar Webster, NY, USA (Suburb of Rochester) Voice 716-872-4114 FAX 716-787-0497 http://www.nfhr.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fjordhorse-digest V98 #166
This message is from: Mike May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 09:09 AM 9/8/98 -0700, you wrote: >This message is from: Ursula Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Hi listsince we are discussing 'Type', I will tell you what the 'grand >guru'(tic) Bob von Bon told me this spring. I was throwing the words 'draft >type' and 'modern type' and 'sporty type' around while having a conversation >with him. He interjected and said to me. "There is only one Type and that's >a Fjord Type." I asked him to clarify and he pointed out that as far as he >was concerned the ideal Fjord that he compares all Fjords to is the picture >on the first page of his book.( I'm sure some of you have seen him...it's a >pencil drawing of a Fjord...maybe someone can tell us the name of the >animal)That is the ideal Type. He then elaborated and told me that if we >consider THAT Fjord as the center line of a highway anything that deviates >from that ideal (whether heavy or light) towards the outside of the highway, >that determines draft or light. I then asked him how wide he would want that >highway to be?(Holland has narrower roads than Canada and U.S. ...grin) He >answered by telling me that conformationally, there would be faults if the >highway were to become too wide.The breed would suffer if extremes in >height, draft and lightness were to be bred. That made a lot of sense to me >at the time and I agree that we need to be very alert to the problems of >extremes. Personally, I saw a 16hh Fjord once and it scared the heck out of me. > Well I think I saw that tall Fjord at Woodstock this year. Or at least I saw A tall Fjord at Woodstock. It did have Canadian lines so it might be the same one. They said it was 16hh. It really didn't look that big to me though. It sure did look like a Fjord though. >You can all chew on that bit of philosophy while we head to Libby and see if >we can garner a few ribbons for Canada. Brian will be driving a Randem in >the Unique Hitch class which should be interesting.It's been going well here >at home but thenthat's home.I keep reminding myself that we do this for >fun and will hopefully have some quality visiting time with friends and >fellow Fjordies. We won't be doing a clinic this year so that will help >somewhat. >Hope to see some of you there.stop by the Trinity Fjords trailer and say hi. > What is a Randem Ursula??? Don't think I ever heard of that. Or was that a typo for a Tandem???
RE: Wolf teeth
This message is from: Marge Littleboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Re.:What about wolf teeth. Should they always be removed? Are they common in Fjord mares? [Marge Littleboy] We have two mares, and both had wolf teeth. Brith had a great deal of pain with her wolf teeth, causing her to not want to respond to the bit, especially backing - which had not been a problem prior to the eruption of the teeth. Once removed and area healed she was back to her usual self. Asta also developed the wolf teeth and these were removed prior to giving them a chance to cause a problem with her training. Brith's wolf teeth did not show until she turned 4 years old, whereas Asta's showed themselves prior to turning two. I am of the feeling that they should be removed, pressure from the bit can cause severe pain/irritation and it is not worth the risk of the irritation causing a problem when they are being ridden or driven. They should be looked for everytime the horse has the teeth floated, as they do not erupt at the same time frame for each animal. It is much better to have them removed when you are on a down time, this to allow that ample time for the gum to hea. I am also from the school that the mares were less likely to get the wolf teeth, but I now know that it is possible for either sex to have them. This is just from my experience, anyone else have feedback?
