Re: religious views
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 12/23/99 11:44:25 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all, whether ye be Muslim, Zen, Christian, Jew, atheistetc. >> Hell, that's all I wanted was shared time. I'm looking out the window at two lovely fjords and feeling pretty cheery -- but opinionated to the end. I don't insist people agree with me, just for the right to be me. And I'll always listen to someone else's opinion. (Well, almost always). Gail
RE: religious views
This message is from: "Frederick J. (Fred) Pack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Holy Batman, Gail Was I ever married to you in a past life? Nobody is trying to tell you how to believe, or behave. If you don't like a message, you ARE entitled to your opinion AND to write it. I will defend, with my life, your right to disagree..even though you are flat wrong. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all, whether ye be Muslim, Zen, Christian, Jew, atheistetc. Fred Pack Pack's Peak Stables Wilkeson, WA USA Gail wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: religious views This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I apologized for snapping at you before under the stress of moving, etc. I didn't agree to give up all my opinions and behave the way you want me to. I suspect we'll never be best friends.Gail
Re: religious views
This message is from: "Meredith Sessoms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Whether you believe in the Lord in Heaven, Buddha, or the Kachina ... it's a wonderful world! Merry Christmas everybody! Meredith Sessoms Soddy-Daisy TN USA ~ Dorina & NFR Aagot ~
Re: religious views
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 12/22/99 12:41:40 PM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << i've asked you before, LIGHTEN UP! >> I apologized for snapping at you before under the stress of moving, etc. I didn't agree to give up all my opinions and behave the way you want me to. I suspect we'll never be best friends.Gail
Re: religious views
This message is from: "linda hickam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ah yes..pc = nix the first amendment.if you're a Christian..merry CHRISTmas everyone and may God's love shine on us all.Linda.p.s.it's very easy to delete this message -- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: religious views >Date: Wed, Dec 22, 1999, 3:08 PM > >This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >In a message dated 12/22/99 10:52:34 AM Mountain Standard Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > ><< Though not a theological scholar, >> >I don't like this sort of thing. Not all Americans are Christian. What we >agree on in the list is animals. Discussing religion and politics is tricky >enough with friends much less strangers. >
Re: religious views
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: not talking about religion with strangers: I kind of think we are not strangers and that we had already agreed to disagree and not be so strict about the topics. This one is about horses, although in a more abstract way.
Re: religious views
This message is from: "Denise Delgado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about the biblical quotes re: the horse and responses. if we are not careful this could start up another one of those bitch sessions...come on gail, i've asked you before, LIGHTEN UP! everyone is entitled the their opinion. i for one enjoyed reading the exerpts. you don't have to be christian to learn something from the bible. just like you don't have to be a nazi to learn something from mein kampf. take a few breaths and relax!!! denise in northern calif. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 11:08 AM Subject: Re: religious views > This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > In a message dated 12/22/99 10:52:34 AM Mountain Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << Though not a theological scholar, >> > I don't like this sort of thing. Not all Americans are Christian. What we > agree on in the list is animals. Discussing religion and politics is tricky > enough with friends much less strangers. >
Re: religious views
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 12/22/99 10:52:34 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Though not a theological scholar, >> I don't like this sort of thing. Not all Americans are Christian. What we agree on in the list is animals. Discussing religion and politics is tricky enough with friends much less strangers.
Re: religious views
This message is from: "Annette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Though not a theological scholar, I'll add my 2 cents to the current theological debate: 1st...there are the 4 horses of the Apocalypse; they come down from Heaven; white horse (Revelation 6:2; Rev. 19:11&14), red horse (Revelation 6:4), black horse (Rev. 6:5), and a pale horse (Rev. 6:8). Whether they died first and went to Heaven or are created in Heaven isn't implied or stated...but, clearly, they're there. 2nd... Isaiah 11:6:9 and Isaiah 65:25 both talk about the way things will be when the Messiah establishes a new earth: "The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together; and a little child will lead them. The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox. The infant will play near the hole of the cobra and the young child put his hand into the viper's nest. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea." 3rd...Concerning the murder of man Genesis 9:5 says: "And for your lifeblood I (God) will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each man, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of his fellow man." The assumption seems to be that animals answer in the next life, therefor, they must have a next life. 4th...Animals were created by God in the Garden of Eden and were declared "Good" by God BEFORE the fall of man. (Genesis 1:31) 5th...God uses animals in describing His own Son, Jesus...Lamb of God (Rev. 5:6, John 1:29) and the Lion of Judah (Revelation 5:5). While these are used figuratively, they imply that God holds animals in a place of favor. While not willing to be martyred for this facet of my beliefs, I do believe the above Scriptures provide a compelling argument for animals in Heaven. Annette Johnson (I haven't written any books) (My "farm" doesn't have a name) Colorado Springs, Colorado
