Re: [flac-dev] Pre-release 1.3.0pre4 (hopefully the last)
Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Add to that: > - linux-x86_64 (passed usual tests, when configured with no options, > --enable-sse) > - minGW (not w64) on Windows 7 32-bit > - Visual Studio 2012 on Windows 7 32-bit > - armv6l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (raspbian) > > Furthermore I've ran the tests I used for the lossless comparison which > is on the FLAC website. The results are attached. I'm not sure what > happened, but it seems something happened to my system (I did no > software update or something of that sort), the results are not fully > reproducible when considering decoding. I'll look into this. However, > these results still show that there hasn't been a (severe) regression in > performance on linux. Awesome, thanks! Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 28
Marcus Johnson wrote: > Well, I'm bored, and I hope I'm not getting in the way of anyone, but I was > like hell might as well try to make a new Xcode project, Sorry, I really do think this is too late in the release cycle. I started working towards a release in February and its still not out yet. I can't tell you how big a chunk of my life this has consumed. I plan to release on Saturday Sydney AU time (and after that I'm travelling for work for 3 weeks). If you can get me a working XCode project in the next couple of days *and* it makes no code changes elsewhere then it can go in this release. > "share/compat.h" which Xcode needs to be listed as "include/share/compat.h" > and I really don't want to be editing these paths, because god only knows > what it'll break, any suggestions? For the autotools build system we specify that include is another place to look for header files (ie gcc -I include/ ). Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 28
Well, I'm bored, and I hope I'm not getting in the way of anyone, but I was like hell might as well try to make a new Xcode project, although I am using 10.8 with the latest xcode, so I'd have to manually remove that, but there is one serious concern, and that's that header files are being called from 1 directory up from where they are, for example: "share/compat.h" which Xcode needs to be listed as "include/share/compat.h" and I really don't want to be editing these paths, because god only knows what it'll break, any suggestions? On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:46 PM, wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev@xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > flac-dev-requ...@xiph.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > flac-dev-ow...@xiph.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..." > > Today's Topics: > >1. Re: flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 27 (Marcus Johnson) >2. Re: flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 27 (Martijn van Beurden) >3. Re: What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Brian Willoughby) >4. README (was flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 27) (Ulrich Klauer) >5. Re: Pre-release 1.3.0pre4 (hopefully the last) > (Martijn van Beurden) > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Marcus Johnson > To: flac-dev@xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:45:31 -0400 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 27 > I'd love to fix the .Xcodeproj (which is what they're called now) but I > don't have a clue how to, if I were to figure it out would you guys accept > it, or is it not worth my time? > > btw, someone on Windows should get the visual studio files working, it > always complains about not finding nasm.exe. > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:00 PM, wrote: > >> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to >> flac-dev@xiph.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> flac-dev-requ...@xiph.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> flac-dev-ow...@xiph.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..." >> >> Today's Topics: >> >>1. Re: [PATCH] Remaining Debian delta (Erik de Castro Lopo) >>2. What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Erik de Castro Lopo) >>3. Re: What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Ulrich Klauer) >>4. Re: What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Erik de Castro Lopo) >>5. Re: What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Ralph Giles) >> >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Erik de Castro Lopo >> To: flac-dev@xiph.org >> Cc: >> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:00:38 +1000 >> Subject: Re: [flac-dev] [PATCH] Remaining Debian delta >> Ulrich Klauer wrote: >> >> > here are two patches from the Debian flac package that haven't found >> > their way into 1.3.0 yet. The first one is important because it fixes >> > a user-visible bug (albeit only affecting >> > --apply-replaygain-which-is-not-lossless). >> > >> > See the commit messages for the source of the patches, I only did the >> > rebasing (which was trivial). >> >> Thanks Ulrich. Applied. >> >> Cheers, >> Erik >> -- >> -- >> Erik de Castro Lopo >> http://www.mega-nerd.com/ >> >> >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Erik de Castro Lopo >> To: flac-dev@xiph.org >> Cc: >> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:19:37 +1000 >> Subject: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj? >> Hi all, >> >> There is a bunch of seemingly windows related stuff in the top level >> directory flac.pbproj which has not been touched since 2009. >> >> If it hasn't been touched, its almost certainly broken and redundant. >> Can I simply delete it? >> >> Cheers, >> Erik >> -- >> -- >> Erik de Castro Lopo >> http://www.mega-nerd.com/ >> >> >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Ulrich Klauer >> To: flac-dev@xiph.org >> Cc: >> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:35:17 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj? >> Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> >> There is a bunch of seemingly windows related stuff in the top level >>> directory flac.pbproj which has not been touched since 2009. >>> >> >> Apparently, it is a Project Builder project, from NeXTSTEP/MacOS X. >> Wikipedia says it "was" an IDE and "superseded by Xcode, as of Mac OS X >> 10.3 Panther". >> >> Ulrich >> >> >> >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Erik de Castro Lopo >> To: flac-dev@xiph.org >> Cc: >> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 01:20:48 +1000 >> Subject: Re: [f
Re: [flac-dev] README (was flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 27)
Ulrich Klauer wrote: > Oh, speaking of README ... Here is a tiny patch to align it with the > renaming of configure.in. Applied thanks. > I also noticed two other things: > - It says "To build FLAC with support for Ogg FLAC you must have built > and installed libogg according to the specific instructions below", > but there are no such instructions in the file. There is for windows. > - The pbproj file is mentioned at the very end: "The Project Builder > project has been deprecated but we are working on replacing it with an > Xcode equivalent." Yep, removed that line as well. Other improvements to that file welcome. I have already updated the version is my private release preparation branch. Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] Pre-release 1.3.0pre4 (hopefully the last)
On 28-04-13 13:23, LRN wrote: On 28.04.2013 13:38, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: I have tagged 1.3.0pre4 in git and provided a tarball here: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/flac-1.3.0pre4.tar.xz I have built and tested the git tree on: linux-x86_64 openbsd5-i386 freebsd5-i386 i686-w64-mingw32 - builds correctly, passes all tests (NT 6.1.7601). Add to that: - linux-x86_64 (passed usual tests, when configured with no options, --enable-sse) - minGW (not w64) on Windows 7 32-bit - Visual Studio 2012 on Windows 7 32-bit - armv6l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (raspbian) Furthermore I've ran the tests I used for the lossless comparison which is on the FLAC website. The results are attached. I'm not sure what happened, but it seems something happened to my system (I did no software update or something of that sort), the results are not fully reproducible when considering decoding. I'll look into this. However, these results still show that there hasn't been a (severe) regression in performance on linux. All tracks-decode.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document All tracks-encode.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
[flac-dev] README (was flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 27)
Martijn van Beurden wrote: These files work fine, but nasm is indeed necessary. Read the README for more information Oh, speaking of README ... Here is a tiny patch to align it with the renaming of configure.in. I also noticed two other things: - It says "To build FLAC with support for Ogg FLAC you must have built and installed libogg according to the specific instructions below", but there are no such instructions in the file. - The pbproj file is mentioned at the very end: "The Project Builder project has been deprecated but we are working on replacing it with an Xcode equivalent." Ulrich >From eb7ce0bce1f0f9eb5dec56374eb1e9dd85066b55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulrich Klauer Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:10:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Refer to configure.ac instead of configure.in --- README |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 41ba136..1c0016e 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Note to embedded developers libFLAC has grown larger over time as more functionality has been included, but much of it may be unnecessary for a particular embedded implementation. Unused parts may be pruned by some simple editing of -configure.in and src/libFLAC/Makefile.am; the following dependency +configure.ac and src/libFLAC/Makefile.am; the following dependency graph shows which modules may be pruned without breaking things further down: @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ $HOME/.xmms/Plugins, instead of the global XMMS plugin area Use these if you have these packages but configure can't find them. If you want to build completely from scratch (i.e. starting with just -configure.in and Makefile.am) you should be able to just run 'autogen.sh' +configure.ac and Makefile.am) you should be able to just run 'autogen.sh' but make sure and read the comments in that file first. @@ -245,6 +245,6 @@ and remove any "FLAC__HAS_OGG" definitions. Building on Mac OS X === -If you have Fink or a recent version of OS X with the proper autotooles, +If you have Fink or a recent version of OS X with the proper autotools, the GNU flow above should work. The Project Builder project has been deprecated but we are working on replacing it with an Xcode equivalent. -- 1.7.10.4 ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj?
On Apr 30, 2013, at 13:45, Marcus Johnson wrote: > I'd love to fix the .Xcodeproj (which is what they're called now) > but I don't have a clue how to, if I were to figure it out would > you guys accept it, or is it not worth my time? Thanks for the offer, but I don't think it's worth the time. Here is my reasoning: 1) Historically, flac has been built from the command line on OSX, just like every other Unix operating system. In that respect, the .pbproj and .xcodeproj files are not really necessary. In fact, that's probably why they became outdated and broken, since nobody really needed them. I have been working with flac for a long time, and I've never seen those files work. When I built the last flac release for OSX distribution, I did not use them, preferring to use make. 2) If anyone is going to fix the .pbproj or .xcodeproj files, I highly recommend that it be done with Xcode itself. Attempting to manually edit these files is pointless. You need to verify them with Xcode anyway, so you might as well use Xcode to fix them. Frankly, recreating them makes more sense than fixing the existing files, although you might look in the existing files to make sure you don't leave anything out. 3) In my opinion, it is better to create the project files with the oldest version of Xcode that is up to the task and supported. The reason is that newer versions of Xcode can open old project files, converting them if necessary. Unfortunately, the reverse is not true, so using Xcode 4 to fix these files would needlessly exclude older versions. The only reason to orphan developers this way is when the sources make use of new OSX features that are not available on older releases, but flac doesn't depend on any OS features that are exclusive to OSX, and certainly not on any OSX features that are only in newer releases. 4) That said, Project Builder (.pbproj) is simply too old to be of use to anyone, so far as I know. Apple possibly still supports OSX 10.4 Tiger, but anything older than that is in the land of "fend for yourself" (where command line make is going to work fine anyway). I believe it is true that Project Builder was last seen on OSX 10.3 Panther, so I don't have a problem with dropping it. I do maintain several Macs running various different OSX releases, and I regularly build things under Tiger to ensure that the largest number of people can run the binary, but even as old as these machines are it's still Xcode, not Project Builder. I'd like to take a stab at creating a set of .xcodeproj files that work with Xcode 2.5 and newer, but maybe someone will beat me to it. I fully support Erik's request to simply delete the .pbproj directory and its contents. Brian Willoughby Sound Consulting p.s. Unfortunately, I do not know who originally created those .pbproj files, why they did it, or whether they ever worked. You might even find archived list messages where I asked about them. ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 27
On 30-04-13 22:45, Marcus Johnson wrote: > btw, someone on Windows should get the visual studio files working, it > always complains about not finding nasm.exe. These files work fine, but nasm is indeed necessary. Read the README for more information ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] flac-dev Digest, Vol 101, Issue 27
I'd love to fix the .Xcodeproj (which is what they're called now) but I don't have a clue how to, if I were to figure it out would you guys accept it, or is it not worth my time? btw, someone on Windows should get the visual studio files working, it always complains about not finding nasm.exe. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:00 PM, wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev@xiph.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > flac-dev-requ...@xiph.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > flac-dev-ow...@xiph.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..." > > Today's Topics: > >1. Re: [PATCH] Remaining Debian delta (Erik de Castro Lopo) >2. What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Erik de Castro Lopo) >3. Re: What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Ulrich Klauer) >4. Re: What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Erik de Castro Lopo) >5. Re: What is in directory flac.pbproj? (Ralph Giles) > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Erik de Castro Lopo > To: flac-dev@xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:00:38 +1000 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] [PATCH] Remaining Debian delta > Ulrich Klauer wrote: > > > here are two patches from the Debian flac package that haven't found > > their way into 1.3.0 yet. The first one is important because it fixes > > a user-visible bug (albeit only affecting > > --apply-replaygain-which-is-not-lossless). > > > > See the commit messages for the source of the patches, I only did the > > rebasing (which was trivial). > > Thanks Ulrich. Applied. > > Cheers, > Erik > -- > -- > Erik de Castro Lopo > http://www.mega-nerd.com/ > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Erik de Castro Lopo > To: flac-dev@xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:19:37 +1000 > Subject: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj? > Hi all, > > There is a bunch of seemingly windows related stuff in the top level > directory flac.pbproj which has not been touched since 2009. > > If it hasn't been touched, its almost certainly broken and redundant. > Can I simply delete it? > > Cheers, > Erik > -- > -- > Erik de Castro Lopo > http://www.mega-nerd.com/ > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Ulrich Klauer > To: flac-dev@xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:35:17 +0200 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj? > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > There is a bunch of seemingly windows related stuff in the top level >> directory flac.pbproj which has not been touched since 2009. >> > > Apparently, it is a Project Builder project, from NeXTSTEP/MacOS X. > Wikipedia says it "was" an IDE and "superseded by Xcode, as of Mac OS X > 10.3 Panther". > > Ulrich > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Erik de Castro Lopo > To: flac-dev@xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 01:20:48 +1000 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj? > Ulrich Klauer wrote: > > > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > > > There is a bunch of seemingly windows related stuff in the top level > > > directory flac.pbproj which has not been touched since 2009. > > > > Apparently, it is a Project Builder project, from NeXTSTEP/MacOS X. > > Wikipedia says it "was" an IDE and "superseded by Xcode, as of Mac OS > > X 10.3 Panther". > > I should junk it then. Whatever is there now doesn't work. If someone > wants to resurrect it they can always pull it out of git. > > Cheers, > Erik > -- > -- > Erik de Castro Lopo > http://www.mega-nerd.com/ > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Ralph Giles > To: flac-dev@xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:06:09 -0700 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj? > On 13-04-30 8:20 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > I should junk it then. Whatever is there now doesn't work. If someone > > wants to resurrect it they can always pull it out of git. > > Yes, that's fine. XCode 4.6.2 binds the extension, but can't open the > project files, saying they're too old, so these aren't useful to current > developers. > > -r > > > > ___ > flac-dev mailing list > flac-dev@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > > ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj?
On 13-04-30 8:20 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > I should junk it then. Whatever is there now doesn't work. If someone > wants to resurrect it they can always pull it out of git. Yes, that's fine. XCode 4.6.2 binds the extension, but can't open the project files, saying they're too old, so these aren't useful to current developers. -r ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj?
Ulrich Klauer wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > There is a bunch of seemingly windows related stuff in the top level > > directory flac.pbproj which has not been touched since 2009. > > Apparently, it is a Project Builder project, from NeXTSTEP/MacOS X. > Wikipedia says it "was" an IDE and "superseded by Xcode, as of Mac OS > X 10.3 Panther". I should junk it then. Whatever is there now doesn't work. If someone wants to resurrect it they can always pull it out of git. Cheers, Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj?
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > There is a bunch of seemingly windows related stuff in the top level > directory flac.pbproj which has not been touched since 2009. Apparently, it is a Project Builder project, from NeXTSTEP/MacOS X. Wikipedia says it "was" an IDE and "superseded by Xcode, as of Mac OS X 10.3 Panther". Ulrich ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
[flac-dev] What is in directory flac.pbproj?
Hi all, There is a bunch of seemingly windows related stuff in the top level directory flac.pbproj which has not been touched since 2009. If it hasn't been touched, its almost certainly broken and redundant. Can I simply delete it? Cheers, Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
