Re: [flac-dev] Pre-release 1.3.0pre4 (hopefully the last)
On 13-04-30 2:45 PM, Martijn van Beurden wrote: >>> http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/flac-1.3.0pre4.tar.xz This tarball passes 'make distcheck' on an armv7l pcduino (AllWinner A10) running Linaro 12.11 ubuntu variant. Likewise on an x86_64 running MacOS 10.7.5. -r ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
[flac-dev] (no subject)
I've got the Xcode project done, I'm having trouble finding the proper format for the header search path, and do I need to include the tests in the xcodeproj? ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
[flac-dev] (no subject)
One last thing, Xcode complains about the .nasm files when compiling for x64, I don't know too much about assembly, can x86 assembly be compiled on x64 at all? ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] (no subject)
On 13-05-01 3:45 PM, Marcus Johnson wrote: > I've got the Xcode project done, I'm having trouble finding the proper > format for the header search path, and do I need to include the tests in > the xcodeproj? It's always better if you can include the self-tests, both for build verification and as example code. However, it's not essential. Unfortunately most IDEs don't have a concept of the 'make check' step, so it can be hard to set up in an obvious way. -r ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Re: [flac-dev] (no subject)
On 05/01/2013 06:47 PM, Marcus Johnson wrote: > One last thing, Xcode complains about the .nasm files when compiling for > x64, I don't know too much about assembly, can x86 assembly be compiled > on x64 at all? the assembly code in flac in x86_32 only. ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
