RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Merrill, Jason
This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may differ
(and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that can
be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to know
when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
start building.  The main class would hold the references to the model,
view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.  I
never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
dispatched.  

I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
unnecessary step.

Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and provides
access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel; then
_mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
like this:

package mvc
{
import events.MVCEvent;
import events.view.ViewEvent;
import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
import events.model.ModelEvent;
import mvc.controller.Controller;
import mvc.model.Model;
import mvc.view.View;
import flash.display.Sprite;
/**
 * ...
 * @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
 */
public class MVC extends Sprite
{   
public var view:View;
public var model:Model;
public var controller:Controller;

private static var _instance:MVC;

public function MVC() 
{   
if ( _instance != null )
{
throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
}
else
{
_instance = this;
}
}

public function initialize():void
{
model = new Model();
view = new View();
controller = new Controller();

model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
onModelInitialized);

controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);

model.initialize();
}

private function
onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
{

model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
view.initialize();
}

private function onViewInitialized(event:ViewEvent):void
{
addChild(view);
view.removeEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);
controller.initialize();
}

private function
onControllerInitialized(event:ControllerEvent):void
{

controller.removeEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
dispatchEvent(new
MVCEvent(MVCEvent.INITIALIZED));
}

public static function get instance():MVC
{
if ( _instance == null )
{
throw new Error( MVC singleton instance not created
yet. );
}
return _instance;
}
}

}


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions

Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)





-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of allandt
bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 11:09 AM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Hi guys

I'm currently feeling my way through the o'reilly design patterns book
and
am going through the 

Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
very cool jason - thanks

just a quick question - this setup works perfectly where the number of views
is known, but how would you implement that with an unknown amount of views?
or is this the setup for the root view with all other views being add()ed to
it?

thanks mate
a

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Merrill, Jason 
jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:

 This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may differ
 (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that can
 be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to know
 when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
 start building.  The main class would hold the references to the model,
 view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
 really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
 the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
 that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
 possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.  I
 never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
 dispatched.

 I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
 could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
 unnecessary step.

 Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
 or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
 order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and provides
 access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
 any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
 calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel; then
 _mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
 like this:

 package mvc
 {
import events.MVCEvent;
import events.view.ViewEvent;
import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
import events.model.ModelEvent;
import mvc.controller.Controller;
import mvc.model.Model;
import mvc.view.View;
import flash.display.Sprite;
/**
 * ...
 * @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
 */
public class MVC extends Sprite
{
public var view:View;
public var model:Model;
public var controller:Controller;

private static var _instance:MVC;

public function MVC()
{
if ( _instance != null )
{
throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
 instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
}
else
{
_instance = this;
}
}

public function initialize():void
{
model = new Model();
view = new View();
controller = new Controller();

model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onModelInitialized);

 controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onControllerInitialized);
view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onViewInitialized);

model.initialize();
}

private function
 onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
{

 model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
view.initialize();
}

private function onViewInitialized(event:ViewEvent):void
{
addChild(view);
view.removeEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onViewInitialized);
controller.initialize();
}

private function
 onControllerInitialized(event:ControllerEvent):void
{

 controller.removeEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onControllerInitialized);
dispatchEvent(new
 MVCEvent(MVCEvent.INITIALIZED));
}

public static function get instance():MVC
{
if ( _instance == null )
{
throw new Error( MVC singleton instance not created
 yet. );
}
return _instance;
}
}

 }


 Jason Merrill

  Bank of  America  Global Learning
 Learning  Performance Soluions

 Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
 Instructional Technology Design Blog
 (note: these are for Bank of America employees only)





 -Original Message-
 From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of allandt
 bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
 Sent: Tuesday, January 

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Merrill, Jason
The view can hold an array of other views, when the main view is told to
build by the controller, it iterates through the array to tell the other
view instances or whatever.  Shouldn't be hard to implement.  My method
does not depend on a single view, it's really just how you want to
structure it.  It will also allow the controller to tell a particular
view to build, i.e.:

//in the controller:
 
private function onSomething(event:Event):void
{
if(somethingSpecial) _mvc.view.mySpecialView.build();
}


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions

Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of allandt
bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:05 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

very cool jason - thanks

just a quick question - this setup works perfectly where the number of
views
is known, but how would you implement that with an unknown amount of
views?
or is this the setup for the root view with all other views being
add()ed to
it?

thanks mate
a

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Merrill, Jason 
jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:

 This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may
differ
 (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that
can
 be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to
know
 when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
 start building.  The main class would hold the references to the
model,
 view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
 really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
 the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
 that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
 possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.
I
 never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
 dispatched.

 I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
 could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
 unnecessary step.

 Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
 or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
 order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and
provides
 access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
 any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
 calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel;
then
 _mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
 like this:

 package mvc
 {
import events.MVCEvent;
import events.view.ViewEvent;
import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
import events.model.ModelEvent;
import mvc.controller.Controller;
import mvc.model.Model;
import mvc.view.View;
import flash.display.Sprite;
/**
 * ...
 * @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
 */
public class MVC extends Sprite
{
public var view:View;
public var model:Model;
public var controller:Controller;

private static var _instance:MVC;

public function MVC()
{
if ( _instance != null )
{
throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
 instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
}
else
{
_instance = this;
}
}

public function initialize():void
{
model = new Model();
view = new View();
controller = new Controller();

model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onModelInitialized);

 controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onControllerInitialized);
view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onViewInitialized);

model.initialize();
}

private function
 onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
{

 model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
view.initialize();
}

private function
onViewInitialized(event:ViewEvent):void
{
addChild(view);
view.removeEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onViewInitialized);
controller.initialize();
}

   

Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
okay that's kinda what i thought

thanks for your help jason

a

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Merrill, Jason 
jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:

 The view can hold an array of other views, when the main view is told to
 build by the controller, it iterates through the array to tell the other
 view instances or whatever.  Shouldn't be hard to implement.  My method
 does not depend on a single view, it's really just how you want to
 structure it.  It will also allow the controller to tell a particular
 view to build, i.e.:

 //in the controller:

 private function onSomething(event:Event):void
 {
if(somethingSpecial) _mvc.view.mySpecialView.build();
 }


 Jason Merrill

  Bank of  America  Global Learning
 Learning  Performance Soluions

 Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
 Instructional Technology Design Blog
 (note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






 -Original Message-
 From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of allandt
 bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
 Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:05 PM
 To: Flash Coders List
 Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

 very cool jason - thanks

 just a quick question - this setup works perfectly where the number of
 views
 is known, but how would you implement that with an unknown amount of
 views?
 or is this the setup for the root view with all other views being
 add()ed to
 it?

 thanks mate
 a

 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Merrill, Jason 
 jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:

  This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may
 differ
  (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that
 can
  be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to
 know
  when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
  start building.  The main class would hold the references to the
 model,
  view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
  really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
  the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
  that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
  possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.
 I
  never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
  dispatched.
 
  I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
  could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
  unnecessary step.
 
  Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
  or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
  order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and
 provides
  access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
  any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
  calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel;
 then
  _mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
  like this:
 
  package mvc
  {
 import events.MVCEvent;
 import events.view.ViewEvent;
 import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
 import events.model.ModelEvent;
 import mvc.controller.Controller;
 import mvc.model.Model;
 import mvc.view.View;
 import flash.display.Sprite;
 /**
  * ...
  * @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
  */
 public class MVC extends Sprite
 {
 public var view:View;
 public var model:Model;
 public var controller:Controller;
 
 private static var _instance:MVC;
 
 public function MVC()
 {
 if ( _instance != null )
 {
 throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
  instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
 }
 else
 {
 _instance = this;
 }
 }
 
 public function initialize():void
 {
 model = new Model();
 view = new View();
 controller = new Controller();
 
 model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
  onModelInitialized);
 
  controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
  onControllerInitialized);
 view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
  onViewInitialized);
 
 model.initialize();
 }
 
 private function
  onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
 {
 
  model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
 view.initialize();
 }
 

Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Paul Andrews

Jumping in here..

The controller is essentially co-coordinating the interactions between 
the views and the model. You could consider the role of setting up the 
application view interfaces as being subsidiary to the controller, or 
even outside of it (after all the application has to instantiate things 
at the start). I don't see that the Model is ever involved with view 
instantiation.


I only see the model as a provider of stateful data, so in this context 
something outside the Model should request the configuration from the 
model (which is responsible for loading the xml config). I'm not sure if 
the application setup is a consideration of the controller or not. 
There's no reason why it shouldn't be a function of the controller -  
after all the controller invokes commands at the request of the views 
for everything else, so there's no reason why it can't handle 
initialisation.


The important thing is that the Model is not dependent or knowledgeable 
about the views that form the application interface.


Paul



allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) wrote:

very cool jason - thanks

just a quick question - this setup works perfectly where the number of views
is known, but how would you implement that with an unknown amount of views?
or is this the setup for the root view with all other views being add()ed to
it?

thanks mate
a

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Merrill, Jason 
jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:

  

This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may differ
(and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that can
be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to know
when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
start building.  The main class would hold the references to the model,
view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.  I
never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
dispatched.

I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
unnecessary step.

Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and provides
access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel; then
_mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
like this:

package mvc
{
   import events.MVCEvent;
   import events.view.ViewEvent;
   import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
   import events.model.ModelEvent;
   import mvc.controller.Controller;
   import mvc.model.Model;
   import mvc.view.View;
   import flash.display.Sprite;
   /**
* ...
* @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
*/
   public class MVC extends Sprite
   {
   public var view:View;
   public var model:Model;
   public var controller:Controller;

   private static var _instance:MVC;

   public function MVC()
   {
   if ( _instance != null )
   {
   throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
   }
   else
   {
   _instance = this;
   }
   }

   public function initialize():void
   {
   model = new Model();
   view = new View();
   controller = new Controller();

   model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
onModelInitialized);

controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
   view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);

   model.initialize();
   }

   private function
onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
   {

model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
   view.initialize();
   }

   private function onViewInitialized(event:ViewEvent):void
   {
   addChild(view);
   view.removeEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);
   controller.initialize();
   }

   private function

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Cor
Hi Jason,

I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.

Thanks in advance.
Kind regards
Cor van Dooren
The Netherlands


-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Merrill,
Jason
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 17:35
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may differ
(and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that can
be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to know
when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
start building.  The main class would hold the references to the model,
view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.  I
never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
dispatched.  

I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
unnecessary step.

Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and provides
access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel; then
_mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
like this:

package mvc
{
import events.MVCEvent;
import events.view.ViewEvent;
import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
import events.model.ModelEvent;
import mvc.controller.Controller;
import mvc.model.Model;
import mvc.view.View;
import flash.display.Sprite;
/**
 * ...
 * @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
 */
public class MVC extends Sprite
{   
public var view:View;
public var model:Model;
public var controller:Controller;

private static var _instance:MVC;

public function MVC() 
{   
if ( _instance != null )
{
throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
}
else
{
_instance = this;
}
}

public function initialize():void
{
model = new Model();
view = new View();
controller = new Controller();

model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
onModelInitialized);

controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);

model.initialize();
}

private function
onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
{

model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
view.initialize();
}

private function onViewInitialized(event:ViewEvent):void
{
addChild(view);
view.removeEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);
controller.initialize();
}

private function
onControllerInitialized(event:ControllerEvent):void
{

controller.removeEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
dispatchEvent(new
MVCEvent(MVCEvent.INITIALIZED));
}

public static function get instance():MVC
{
if ( _instance == null )
{
throw new Error( MVC singleton instance not created
yet. );
}
return _instance;
}
}
   

Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Henrik Andersson

Cor wrote:

Hi Jason,

I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.



I recommend the head first design patterns book. Not only can I 
guarantee that you will actually get it, you will have fun while doing it!

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Cor
I have read Design patterns from O'Reilly but it does not dig in 



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Henrik
Andersson
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:24
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.


I recommend the head first design patterns book. Not only can I 
guarantee that you will actually get it, you will have fun while doing it!
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 270.14.149/2631 - Release Date: 01/19/10
08:34:00

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Cor
I even received a MVC for an appalication I was building from Muzak, but
that is just a little to much to comprehend at this time.
I need to understand it from a little and very basic example to start with.



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Henrik
Andersson
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:24
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.


I recommend the head first design patterns book. Not only can I 
guarantee that you will actually get it, you will have fun while doing it!
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 270.14.149/2631 - Release Date: 01/19/10
08:34:00

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Nathan Mynarcik
There is a nice tutorial on lynda.com done by Todd Perkins I believe. It is a 
very simple MVC flash application. If you planned on taking advantage of other 
tutorials on there, then it might be worth the subscription cost. 

--Original Message--
From: Cor
Sender: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To: 'Flash Coders List'
ReplyTo: Flash Coders List
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework
Sent: Jan 19, 2010 1:31 PM

I even received a MVC for an appalication I was building from Muzak, but
that is just a little to much to comprehend at this time.
I need to understand it from a little and very basic example to start with.



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Henrik
Andersson
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:24
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.


I recommend the head first design patterns book. Not only can I 
guarantee that you will actually get it, you will have fun while doing it!
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 270.14.149/2631 - Release Date: 01/19/10
08:34:00

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Nathan Mynarcik
Interactive Web Developer
nat...@mynarcik.com
254.749.2525
www.mynarcik.com

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread John McCormack

Merrill, Jason wrote:

The view can hold an array of other views,
Any new views can request to be added to the listener/notify list using 
the observer pattern, as in please inform me too, if things change.


John


 when the main view is told to
build by the controller, it iterates through the array to tell the other
view instances or whatever.  Shouldn't be hard to implement.  My method
does not depend on a single view, it's really just how you want to
structure it.  It will also allow the controller to tell a particular
view to build, i.e.:

//in the controller:
 
private function onSomething(event:Event):void

{
if(somethingSpecial) _mvc.view.mySpecialView.build();
}


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions


Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of allandt
bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:05 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

very cool jason - thanks

just a quick question - this setup works perfectly where the number of
views
is known, but how would you implement that with an unknown amount of
views?
or is this the setup for the root view with all other views being
add()ed to
it?

thanks mate
a

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Merrill, Jason 
jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:

  

This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may


differ
  

(and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that


can
  

be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to


know
  

when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
start building.  The main class would hold the references to the


model,
  

view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.


I
  

never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
dispatched.

I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
unnecessary step.

Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and


provides
  

access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel;


then
  

_mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
like this:

package mvc
{
   import events.MVCEvent;
   import events.view.ViewEvent;
   import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
   import events.model.ModelEvent;
   import mvc.controller.Controller;
   import mvc.model.Model;
   import mvc.view.View;
   import flash.display.Sprite;
   /**
* ...
* @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
*/
   public class MVC extends Sprite
   {
   public var view:View;
   public var model:Model;
   public var controller:Controller;

   private static var _instance:MVC;

   public function MVC()
   {
   if ( _instance != null )
   {
   throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
   }
   else
   {
   _instance = this;
   }
   }

   public function initialize():void
   {
   model = new Model();
   view = new View();
   controller = new Controller();

   model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
onModelInitialized);

controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
   view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);

   model.initialize();
   }

   private function
onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
   {

model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
   view.initialize();
   }

   private function


onViewInitialized(event:ViewEvent):void
  

   {
   

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Cor
Thanks, Nathan!

-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Nathan
Mynarcik
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:42
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

There is a nice tutorial on lynda.com done by Todd Perkins I believe. It is
a very simple MVC flash application. If you planned on taking advantage of
other tutorials on there, then it might be worth the subscription cost. 

--Original Message--
From: Cor
Sender: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To: 'Flash Coders List'
ReplyTo: Flash Coders List
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework
Sent: Jan 19, 2010 1:31 PM

I even received a MVC for an appalication I was building from Muzak, but
that is just a little to much to comprehend at this time.
I need to understand it from a little and very basic example to start with.



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Henrik
Andersson
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:24
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.


I recommend the head first design patterns book. Not only can I 
guarantee that you will actually get it, you will have fun while doing it!
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 270.14.149/2631 - Release Date: 01/19/10
08:34:00

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Nathan Mynarcik
Interactive Web Developer
nat...@mynarcik.com
254.749.2525
www.mynarcik.com

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.730 / Virus Database: 270.14.149/2631 - Release Date: 01/19/10
08:34:00

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread John McCormack

Cor,

I am only familiar with a part of it but the book ActionScript 3 Design 
Patterns by Joey Lott and Danny Patterson from Adobe Press has a nice 
example using an analogue and digital clock but only one set of data.
You can imagine a wrist watch view asking to get informed when the time 
changes.


John

Cor wrote:

Hi Jason,

I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.

Thanks in advance.
Kind regards
Cor van Dooren
The Netherlands


-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Merrill,
Jason
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 17:35
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may differ
(and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that can
be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to know
when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
start building.  The main class would hold the references to the model,
view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.  I
never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
dispatched.  


I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
unnecessary step.

Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and provides
access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel; then
_mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
like this:

package mvc
{
import events.MVCEvent;
import events.view.ViewEvent;
import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
import events.model.ModelEvent;
import mvc.controller.Controller;
import mvc.model.Model;
import mvc.view.View;
import flash.display.Sprite;
/**
 * ...
 * @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
 */
public class MVC extends Sprite
{   
public var view:View;
public var model:Model;
public var controller:Controller;

private static var _instance:MVC;

		public function MVC() 
		{	

if ( _instance != null )
{
throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
}
else
{
_instance = this;
}
}

public function initialize():void
{
model = new Model();
view = new View();
controller = new Controller();

model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
onModelInitialized);

controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);

model.initialize();
}

private function
onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
{

model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
view.initialize();
}

private function onViewInitialized(event:ViewEvent):void
{
addChild(view);
view.removeEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);
controller.initialize();
}

private function
onControllerInitialized(event:ControllerEvent):void
{

controller.removeEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
dispatchEvent(new
MVCEvent(MVCEvent.INITIALIZED));
}

public 

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Merrill, Jason
 Any new views can request to be added to the listener/notify list
using 
the observer pattern, as in please inform me too, if things change.

Right - I was trying to keep things simple for the poster.


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions

Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of John
McCormack
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:43 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Merrill, Jason wrote:
 The view can hold an array of other views,
Any new views can request to be added to the listener/notify list using 
the observer pattern, as in please inform me too, if things change.

John

  when the main view is told to
 build by the controller, it iterates through the array to tell the
other
 view instances or whatever.  Shouldn't be hard to implement.  My
method
 does not depend on a single view, it's really just how you want to
 structure it.  It will also allow the controller to tell a particular
 view to build, i.e.:

 //in the controller:
  
 private function onSomething(event:Event):void
 {
   if(somethingSpecial) _mvc.view.mySpecialView.build();
 }


 Jason Merrill 

  Bank of  America  Global Learning 
 Learning  Performance Soluions

 Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
 Instructional Technology Design Blog
 (note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






 -Original Message-
 From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of
allandt
 bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
 Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:05 PM
 To: Flash Coders List
 Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

 very cool jason - thanks

 just a quick question - this setup works perfectly where the number of
 views
 is known, but how would you implement that with an unknown amount of
 views?
 or is this the setup for the root view with all other views being
 add()ed to
 it?

 thanks mate
 a

 On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Merrill, Jason 
 jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:

   
 This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may
 
 differ
   
 (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that
 
 can
   
 be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to
 
 know
   
 when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
 start building.  The main class would hold the references to the
 
 model,
   
 view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
 really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
 the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled
than
 that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
 possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.
 
 I
   
 never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
 dispatched.

 I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
 could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
 unnecessary step.

 Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends
Sprite
 or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
 order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and
 
 provides
   
 access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to
access
 any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
 calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel;
 
 then
   
 _mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
 like this:

 package mvc
 {
import events.MVCEvent;
import events.view.ViewEvent;
import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
import events.model.ModelEvent;
import mvc.controller.Controller;
import mvc.model.Model;
import mvc.view.View;
import flash.display.Sprite;
/**
 * ...
 * @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
 */
public class MVC extends Sprite
{
public var view:View;
public var model:Model;
public var controller:Controller;

private static var _instance:MVC;

public function MVC()
{
if ( _instance != null )
{
throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
 instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
}
else
{
_instance = this;
}
}

public function initialize():void
   

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Cor
My version is ActionScript 3 Design Patterns by William Sanders  Chandima
Cumaranatunge.
The MVC there is describe as a combination of several other patterns.
The books is good, but I have to start at one level below that.

Is there somewhere a shareable example of the MVC pattern??



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of John
McCormack
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:48
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor,

I am only familiar with a part of it but the book ActionScript 3 Design 
Patterns by Joey Lott and Danny Patterson from Adobe Press has a nice 
example using an analogue and digital clock but only one set of data.
You can imagine a wrist watch view asking to get informed when the time 
changes.

John

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.

 Thanks in advance.
 Kind regards
 Cor van Dooren
 The Netherlands


 -Original Message-
 From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Merrill,
 Jason
 Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 17:35
 To: Flash Coders List
 Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

 This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may differ
 (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that can
 be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to know
 when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
 start building.  The main class would hold the references to the model,
 view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
 really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
 the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
 that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
 possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.  I
 never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
 dispatched.  

 I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
 could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
 unnecessary step.

 Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
 or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
 order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and provides
 access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
 any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
 calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel; then
 _mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
 like this:

 package mvc
 {
   import events.MVCEvent;
   import events.view.ViewEvent;
   import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
   import events.model.ModelEvent;
   import mvc.controller.Controller;
   import mvc.model.Model;
   import mvc.view.View;
   import flash.display.Sprite;
   /**
* ...
* @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
*/
   public class MVC extends Sprite
   {   
   public var view:View;
   public var model:Model;
   public var controller:Controller;
   
   private static var _instance:MVC;
   
   public function MVC() 
   {   
   if ( _instance != null )
   {
 throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
 instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
   }
 else
   {
   _instance = this;
   }
   }
   
   public function initialize():void
   {
   model = new Model();
   view = new View();
   controller = new Controller();
   
   model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onModelInitialized);
   
 controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onControllerInitialized);
   view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onViewInitialized);
   
   model.initialize();
   }
   
   private function
 onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
   {
   
 model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, onModelInitialized);
   view.initialize();
   }
   
   private function 

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Merrill, Jason
If you have an iPhone or iTouch, O'Reilly has the digitial version of
ActionScript 3 Design Patterns for download to iPod Touch/iPhone for
only $5.  A steal for that price, and the iPhone reader app that comes
built in with it works very nice.  You can find it on the App store (I
think I found it by searching for Actionscript).


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions

Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of John
McCormack
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:48 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor,

I am only familiar with a part of it but the book ActionScript 3 Design 
Patterns by Joey Lott and Danny Patterson from Adobe Press has a nice 
example using an analogue and digital clock but only one set of data.
You can imagine a wrist watch view asking to get informed when the time 
changes.

John

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it
works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.

 Thanks in advance.
 Kind regards
 Cor van Dooren
 The Netherlands


 -Original Message-
 From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of
Merrill,
 Jason
 Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 17:35
 To: Flash Coders List
 Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

 This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may
differ
 (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that
can
 be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to
know
 when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
 start building.  The main class would hold the references to the
model,
 view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
 really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
 the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
 that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
 possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.
I
 never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
 dispatched.  

 I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
 could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
 unnecessary step.

 Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
 or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
 order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and
provides
 access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
 any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
 calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel;
then
 _mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
 like this:

 package mvc
 {
   import events.MVCEvent;
   import events.view.ViewEvent;
   import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
   import events.model.ModelEvent;
   import mvc.controller.Controller;
   import mvc.model.Model;
   import mvc.view.View;
   import flash.display.Sprite;
   /**
* ...
* @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
*/
   public class MVC extends Sprite
   {   
   public var view:View;
   public var model:Model;
   public var controller:Controller;
   
   private static var _instance:MVC;
   
   public function MVC() 
   {   
   if ( _instance != null )
   {
 throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
 instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
   }
 else
   {
   _instance = this;
   }
   }
   
   public function initialize():void
   {
   model = new Model();
   view = new View();
   controller = new Controller();
   
   model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onModelInitialized);
   
 controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onControllerInitialized);
   view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
 onViewInitialized);
   
   model.initialize();
   }
   
   

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Merrill, Jason
Cor, if I can find some time, I'll try and send you a simple MVC
example.  We'll see how tonight goes with my 2 year old.


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions

Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Cor
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:55 PM
To: 'Flash Coders List'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

My version is ActionScript 3 Design Patterns by William Sanders 
Chandima
Cumaranatunge.
The MVC there is describe as a combination of several other patterns.
The books is good, but I have to start at one level below that.

Is there somewhere a shareable example of the MVC pattern??



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of John
McCormack
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:48
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor,

I am only familiar with a part of it but the book ActionScript 3 Design 
Patterns by Joey Lott and Danny Patterson from Adobe Press has a nice 
example using an analogue and digital clock but only one set of data.
You can imagine a wrist watch view asking to get informed when the time 
changes.

John

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it
works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.

 Thanks in advance.
 Kind regards
 Cor van Dooren
 The Netherlands


 -Original Message-
 From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of
Merrill,
 Jason
 Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 17:35
 To: Flash Coders List
 Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

 This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may
differ
 (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that
can
 be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to
know
 when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
 start building.  The main class would hold the references to the
model,
 view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
 really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
 the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
 that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
 possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.
I
 never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
 dispatched.  

 I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
 could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
 unnecessary step.

 Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
 or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
 order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and
provides
 access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
 any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
 calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel;
then
 _mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
 like this:

 package mvc
 {
   import events.MVCEvent;
   import events.view.ViewEvent;
   import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
   import events.model.ModelEvent;
   import mvc.controller.Controller;
   import mvc.model.Model;
   import mvc.view.View;
   import flash.display.Sprite;
   /**
* ...
* @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
*/
   public class MVC extends Sprite
   {   
   public var view:View;
   public var model:Model;
   public var controller:Controller;
   
   private static var _instance:MVC;
   
   public function MVC() 
   {   
   if ( _instance != null )
   {
 throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
 instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
   }
 else
   {
   _instance = this;
   }
   }
   
   public function initialize():void
   {
   model = new Model();
   view = new View();
   controller = new Controller();
   
   

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Cor
Jason,

GREAT!!!
Thank you.

I hope the little one lets you rest. ;-)

Cor

-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Merrill,
Jason
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:58
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor, if I can find some time, I'll try and send you a simple MVC
example.  We'll see how tonight goes with my 2 year old.


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions

Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Cor
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:55 PM
To: 'Flash Coders List'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

My version is ActionScript 3 Design Patterns by William Sanders 
Chandima
Cumaranatunge.
The MVC there is describe as a combination of several other patterns.
The books is good, but I have to start at one level below that.

Is there somewhere a shareable example of the MVC pattern??



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of John
McCormack
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:48
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor,

I am only familiar with a part of it but the book ActionScript 3 Design 
Patterns by Joey Lott and Danny Patterson from Adobe Press has a nice 
example using an analogue and digital clock but only one set of data.
You can imagine a wrist watch view asking to get informed when the time 
changes.

John

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it
works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.

 Thanks in advance.
 Kind regards
 Cor van Dooren
 The Netherlands


 -Original Message-
 From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of
Merrill,
 Jason
 Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 17:35
 To: Flash Coders List
 Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

 This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may
differ
 (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that
can
 be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to
know
 when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
 start building.  The main class would hold the references to the
model,
 view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
 really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
 the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
 that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
 possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.
I
 never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
 dispatched.  

 I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
 could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
 unnecessary step.

 Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
 or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
 order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and
provides
 access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
 any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
 calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel;
then
 _mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
 like this:

 package mvc
 {
   import events.MVCEvent;
   import events.view.ViewEvent;
   import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
   import events.model.ModelEvent;
   import mvc.controller.Controller;
   import mvc.model.Model;
   import mvc.view.View;
   import flash.display.Sprite;
   /**
* ...
* @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
*/
   public class MVC extends Sprite
   {   
   public var view:View;
   public var model:Model;
   public var controller:Controller;
   
   private static var _instance:MVC;
   
   public function MVC() 
   {   
   if ( _instance != null )
   {
 throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
 instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
   }
 else
   {
  

RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Barry Hannah
Cor,
I've found it the other way - trying to find complex examples of MVC are
hard - there are heaps of overly simple ones that don't really tell me a
lot about wiring complicated applications together.

Also, I recommend you take any advice/examples objectively. There are
many ways to skin an MVC cat.
Some frameworks are tightly coupled, some are loosely coupled, some use
dependency injection, some don't.
Some peoples examples have the logic in the controller, some in the
model. Some people use the controller to load data and the model to
store it. Some people extend the metaphor to MVCS (S for service -
using service classes to load external data).
There are so many different takes on it.

Here's a really basic tutorial fwiw. Again, I'm not sure I agree with
all of the methods involved, but like anything you can watch and learn
from it and apply the bits that make sense to you.
http://pv3d.s3.amazonaws.com/videos/tutorials/actionscript3/mvc/mvc.mp4

Personally, the more I look into Robotlegs the more I like it.
Especially now people are starting to consider AS3Signals as the event
method. This writeup says it all for me:
http://alecmce.com/library/robotlegspong1 There's even source code to
check the whole thing out.

Barry.



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Cor
Sent: Wednesday, 20 January 2010 9:00 a.m.
To: 'Flash Coders List'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Jason,

GREAT!!!
Thank you.

I hope the little one lets you rest. ;-)

Cor

-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Merrill,
Jason
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:58
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor, if I can find some time, I'll try and send you a simple MVC
example.  We'll see how tonight goes with my 2 year old.


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions

Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Cor
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:55 PM
To: 'Flash Coders List'
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

My version is ActionScript 3 Design Patterns by William Sanders 
Chandima
Cumaranatunge.
The MVC there is describe as a combination of several other patterns.
The books is good, but I have to start at one level below that.

Is there somewhere a shareable example of the MVC pattern??



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of John
McCormack
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:48
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor,

I am only familiar with a part of it but the book ActionScript 3 Design 
Patterns by Joey Lott and Danny Patterson from Adobe Press has a nice 
example using an analogue and digital clock but only one set of data.
You can imagine a wrist watch view asking to get informed when the time 
changes.

John

Cor wrote:
 Hi Jason,

 I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
 If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

 I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
 I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it
works.
 If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.

 Thanks in advance.
 Kind regards
 Cor van Dooren
 The Netherlands


 -Original Message-
 From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of
Merrill,
 Jason
 Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 17:35
 To: Flash Coders List
 Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

 This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may
differ
 (and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that
can
 be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to
know
 when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
 start building.  The main class would hold the references to the
model,
 view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
 really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
 the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
 that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
 possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.
I
 never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
 dispatched.  

 I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
 could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
 unnecessary 

Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread John McCormack

I have that book too but the Joey Lott book is clearer (for me).
They have code samples here:
http://rightactionscript.com/aas3wdp/

The book is a very good.

John

Cor wrote:

My version is ActionScript 3 Design Patterns by William Sanders  Chandima
Cumaranatunge.
The MVC there is describe as a combination of several other patterns.
The books is good, but I have to start at one level below that.

Is there somewhere a shareable example of the MVC pattern??



-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of John
McCormack
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 20:48
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Cor,

I am only familiar with a part of it but the book ActionScript 3 Design 
Patterns by Joey Lott and Danny Patterson from Adobe Press has a nice 
example using an analogue and digital clock but only one set of data.
You can imagine a wrist watch view asking to get informed when the time 
changes.


John

Cor wrote:
  

Hi Jason,

I hope you don't mind me addressing you of list.
If you do, please ignore this message and I apologize to you!

I am trying to grasp the MVC pattern, but it is very hard for me.
I am looking for a very simple example which explains the way it works.
If you can help me with this, I would be very greatful.

Thanks in advance.
Kind regards
Cor van Dooren
The Netherlands


-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Merrill,
Jason
Sent: dinsdag 19 januari 2010 17:35
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may differ
(and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that can
be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to know
when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
start building.  The main class would hold the references to the model,
view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled than
that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.  I
never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
dispatched.  


I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
unnecessary step.

Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends Sprite
or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and provides
access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to access
any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel; then
_mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
like this:

package mvc
{
import events.MVCEvent;
import events.view.ViewEvent;
import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
import events.model.ModelEvent;
import mvc.controller.Controller;
import mvc.model.Model;
import mvc.view.View;
import flash.display.Sprite;
/**
 * ...
 * @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
 */
public class MVC extends Sprite
{   
public var view:View;
public var model:Model;
public var controller:Controller;

private static var _instance:MVC;

		public function MVC() 
		{	

if ( _instance != null )
{
throw new Error( Only one MVC instance should be
instantiated.  Use MVC.instance instead. );
}
else
{
_instance = this;
}
}

public function initialize():void
{
model = new Model();
view = new View();
controller = new Controller();

model.addEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED,
onModelInitialized);

controller.addEventListener(ControllerEvent.INITIALIZED,
onControllerInitialized);
view.addEventListener(ViewEvent.INITIALIZED,
onViewInitialized);

model.initialize();
}

private function
onModelInitialized(event:ModelEvent):void
{

model.removeEventListener(ModelEvent.INITIALIZED, 

Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread John McCormack
I need things pretty simple too, but he did mention new views and adding 
them in.
Also, the books I have read say you often get combination of patterns 
and that you need that distance between view and model that Observer brings.
Maybe I am 'Observer' fixated because it just made a big difference to 
my C++ code.


Model:flashcoders
Views:Firefox,Thunderbird, I.E., PC, MAC, Linnux
Controller:the pipework

John


Merrill, Jason wrote:

Any new views can request to be added to the listener/notify list
  
using 
the observer pattern, as in please inform me too, if things change.


Right - I was trying to keep things simple for the poster.


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions


Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of John
McCormack
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:43 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

Merrill, Jason wrote:
  

The view can hold an array of other views,

Any new views can request to be added to the listener/notify list using 
the observer pattern, as in please inform me too, if things change.


John

  

 when the main view is told to
build by the controller, it iterates through the array to tell the


other
  

view instances or whatever.  Shouldn't be hard to implement.  My


method
  

does not depend on a single view, it's really just how you want to
structure it.  It will also allow the controller to tell a particular
view to build, i.e.:

//in the controller:
 
private function onSomething(event:Event):void

{
if(somethingSpecial) _mvc.view.mySpecialView.build();
}


Jason Merrill 

 Bank of  America  Global Learning 
Learning  Performance Soluions


Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community  and visit our
Instructional Technology Design Blog
(note: these are for Bank of America employees only)






-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
[mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of


allandt
  

bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:05 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

very cool jason - thanks

just a quick question - this setup works perfectly where the number of
views
is known, but how would you implement that with an unknown amount of
views?
or is this the setup for the root view with all other views being
add()ed to
it?

thanks mate
a

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Merrill, Jason 
jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com wrote:

  


This is my opinion, I'm sure others will have their own that may

  

differ
  


(and probably recommend you check out some frameworks  - though that

  

can
  


be a lot to tackle) :  the controller would listen to the model to

  

know
  


when the data is ready and available.  It would then tell the view to
start building.  The main class would hold the references to the

  

model,
  


view, controller, but would not command any classes to do anything
really.  You could have the view listen to the model as well and skip
the controller doing it, but I like the view to be more decoupled
  

than
  

that.  I usually try and keep most listeners in the controller where
possible, though many end up in the view, depending on the situation.

  

I
  


never have listeners in the model though, only events that are
dispatched.

I actually have the model start and do it's own XML loading, but you
could have the controller tell it to do that, just seems like an
unnecessary step.

Another thing I do is have a main class called MVC that extends
  

Sprite
  

or DisplayObject which initializes the model, view, controller, in
order, dispatches an event when all three are initialized, and

  

provides
  


access to each via a singleton implementation.  It allows me to
  

access
  

any part of a model, view, controller from any other part just by
calling MVC.instance.  Then it's just var _mvc:MVC = MVC.instancel;

  

then
  


_mvc.model.myprop or _mvc.view.update() or whatever. That class looks
like this:

package mvc
{
   import events.MVCEvent;
   import events.view.ViewEvent;
   import events.controller.ControllerEvent;
   import events.model.ModelEvent;
   import mvc.controller.Controller;
   import mvc.model.Model;
   import mvc.view.View;
   import flash.display.Sprite;
   /**
* ...
* @author Jason Merrill - Bank of America
*/
   public class MVC extends Sprite
   {
   public var view:View;
   public var model:Model;
   

Re: [Flashcoders] Using MVC for a site framework

2010-01-19 Thread Steven Sacks

Want to do MVC right?  Use this:

http://www.robotlegs.org/
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] SOLVED Crossdomain.xml, shared hosting, https, oh my!

2010-01-19 Thread Kathy Alberts
Hi Steven,

It was a pleasure chatting with you yesterday. We feel that your background
is potentially suitable for our ActionScript programmer position. At this
point, we are in the initial phone conversation phase with candidates and
should have more information on who we will continue through the process in
about 2 weeks time. I will contact you if we decide to move forward.

Thanks again,
Kathy




On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Steven Loe stevenloe5...@yahoo.comwrote:

 Just wanted to post back that this is solved, so that it may help someone
 else:

 I found that I had to load both of the policy files over https in order to
 make the crossdomain policy take effect.

 First line of the document class' constructor:
 Security.loadPolicyFile('https://stage.example.com/crossdomain.xml'https://stage.example.com/crossdomain.xml%27
 );
 Security.loadPolicyFile('https://stage.example.com/game/crossdomain.xml'https://stage.example.com/game/crossdomain.xml%27
 );

 Happy OK message in my policyfiles.txt log:
 OK: Request for resource at https://stage.example.com/game/direct_paymentby 
 requestor from
 http://stage.example.com/media/swf/game.swf is permitted due to policy
 file at https://stage.example.com/game/crossdomain.xml

 Crossdomain.xml files and web service paths are as below:

 Thanks!

 Now that this is working, I can play with getting rid of the '*'


   The swf is loaded via http at
 http://stage.example.com/media/swf/game.swf
   The credit card data is Loaded/sent via https at
 https://stage.example.com/game/direct_payment
   Policy File 1 is here: http://stage.example.com/crossdomain.xml
   Policy file 2 is here: http://stage.example.com/game/crossdomain.xml:
  
   Policy File 1:
   ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
   !DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy
 SYSTEM 'http://www.adobe.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd'
   cross-domain-policy
   site-control
  permitted-cross-domain-policies=all/
   allow-access-from
  domain=*/
   /cross-domain-policy
  
   Policy file 2:
   ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
   !DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy
 SYSTEM 'http://www.adobe.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd'
   cross-domain-policy
   allow-access-from
  domain=*.example.com secure=false/
   /cross-domain-policy


 ___
 Flashcoders mailing list
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


[Flashcoders] How this is done?

2010-01-19 Thread skoo viya
http://en.tackfilm.se/?id=1263055474592RA80
http://en.tackfilm.se/?id=1263055474592RA80

-- 
Cheers,
skooviya
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


[Flashcoders] **TODAY** Developers: Flash Platform -- Building State of the Art Video and Media Players ** Online-only, Public User Group Meeting -- TODAY Wednesday January 20 @ 12:00 NOON PST

2010-01-19 Thread greg h
The online-only OSMF User Group
http://groups.adobe.com/groups/7af970e6e4is pleased to have a live
presentation **TODAY** on OSMF's new features by a
developer from the OSMF Team, Edwin van
Rijkomhttp://nl.linkedin.com/in/vanrijkom,
Sr. Computer Scientist at Adobe. This meeting is open to all who are
interested. Please forward notice about this meeting to all who you think
may be interested.

The link for the online meeting room can be found in the meeting
announcement link here:
http://groups.adobe.com/posts/3e8fddb492

Edwin will be reviewing changes and new features in OSMF delivered in Sprint
8 (released December), as well as providing an overview of new features in
Sprint 9 (releasing next week).

Topics to be covered include:

   - API Refactoring
Changeshttp://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/download/attachments/34373765/ReleaseNotesv08.pdf
   - Subclip 
Supporthttp://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/osmf/Subclip+Specification
   - Live Streaming
Supporthttp://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/osmf/Live+Support+Mini-Spec
   - Flash Media Manifest File
Formathttp://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/osmf/Flash+Media+Manifest+File+Format+Specification(F4M)
Support
- Multi-BitRate (MBR) Streaming;
  - Digital Rights Management (DRM) via Flash
Accesshttp://www.adobe.com/products/flashaccess/,

  - For full details see specification
herehttps://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/Flash%20Media%20Manifest%20File%20Format%20Specification
  - Closed Captioning
Plug-inhttp://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/osmf/Captioning+Plugin
   - Pre-Assigned
Durationshttp://help.adobe.com/en_US/OSMF/1.0/AS3LR/org/osmf/video/VideoElement.html#defaultDuration

Edwin previously presented at the Adobe MAX 2009 conference as a
co-presenter on the session entitled Introduction to Adobe's Open Source
Media Framework. Following is a link for a recording of Edwin's MAX Session
(Edwin's portion starting at 24:00 in the recording timecode):
http://max.adobe.com/online/session/332

OSMF is an open source ActionScript 3 framework for building video and media
players supporting cutting edge Flash Platform features for media delivery.
If you have any curiosity about media players in Flash or Flex, this is a
great forum for exploring and getting questions answered.
If you have an ongoing interest in this area, *please join this group by
logging in **at
**groups.adobe.com/groups/7af970e6e4*http://groups.adobe.com/groups/7af970e6e4
* and selecting the JOIN THIS GROUP link* (red graphic on right side).

This online-only OSMF User Group
http://groups.adobe.com/groups/7af970e6e4meets regularly at this
time and day of every month. That is the 3rd
Wednesday of every month @ 12:00 NOON PST time [Time Zone Converter
herehttp://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html].
All meetings are recorded.  Links for prior meeting recordings are on the
group site in various places including on the group home
pagehttp://groups.adobe.com/groups/7af970e6e4under the heading
Previous Connect Sessions.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders