Re: [Flashcoders] h264 video looks blurry/crappy in flash
the aspect is 1:1 If i playback a flv (on2 VP6) everything looks as it should. I even tried some videos from apple.com/trailes - at first i thought they where played back perfectly. But after a few replays i could see some enhanced compression artifacts especiallly in the reds compared to when playing them back in the quicktime player. But they wasnt as blurry as my h264. I tried using a .mov wrapper instead of mp4. Same result. Which make me start to think it could be my encodign software... Anyway i will make some extra tests to try and find a bit more head and tails in the matters. cheers, B) Søren MOTION INTERACTIVITY dslnc studio - www.desilence.net +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) On Oct 28, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Latcho wrote: Check: Is your video pixel aspect ratio square pixels 1:1 ? or for ex. 1:1.07 or 1:1.333. Søren Christensen wrote: The video i am using has the same size as the stage area so no scaling is taking place. smoothing = true normally activates antialiasing if the video is scaled up/down. However weird things hapens with h264 - with smoothing 'on' the image gets too soft and to some degree degrades the picture. With smoothing 'off' it leaves the video very rough and aliased as if the video had been scaled up from 1/4th the resolution. I have been testing on osx 10.4 safari/ff and 9.0.115 fp Cheers, B) Søren MOTION INTERACTIVITY dslnc studio - www.desilence.net +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) On Oct 24, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Cedric Muller wrote: do you, by any chance, use the video.smoothing = true ? by looking at the video, it seems this option is set to true ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
[Flashcoders] ps3 fp9 features
Does anybody have acces to or know where to find a detailed overview of the FP9 for the PS3? I have a hard time finding any useable information :-/ Cheers, B) Søren MOTION INTERACTIVITY dslnc studio - www.desilence.net +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] h264 video looks blurry/crappy in flash
I will give it a try But I find the flash video encoder very basic. Not the best place to finetune the bitrate/quality balance. Cheers, B) Søren MOTION INTERACTIVITY dslnc studio - www.desilence.net +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) On Oct 29, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Cedric Muller wrote: What if you encode your video directly with the Flash Video Encoder ? cedric the aspect is 1:1 If i playback a flv (on2 VP6) everything looks as it should. I even tried some videos from apple.com/trailes - at first i thought they where played back perfectly. But after a few replays i could see some enhanced compression artifacts especiallly in the reds compared to when playing them back in the quicktime player. But they wasnt as blurry as my h264. I tried using a .mov wrapper instead of mp4. Same result. Which make me start to think it could be my encodign software... Anyway i will make some extra tests to try and find a bit more head and tails in the matters. cheers, B) Søren MOTION INTERACTIVITY dslnc studio - www.desilence.net +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) On Oct 28, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Latcho wrote: Check: Is your video pixel aspect ratio square pixels 1:1 ? or for ex. 1:1.07 or 1:1.333. Søren Christensen wrote: The video i am using has the same size as the stage area so no scaling is taking place. smoothing = true normally activates antialiasing if the video is scaled up/down. However weird things hapens with h264 - with smoothing 'on' the image gets too soft and to some degree degrades the picture. With smoothing 'off' it leaves the video very rough and aliased as if the video had been scaled up from 1/4th the resolution. I have been testing on osx 10.4 safari/ff and 9.0.115 fp Cheers, B) Søren MOTION INTERACTIVITY dslnc studio - www.desilence.net +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) On Oct 24, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Cedric Muller wrote: do you, by any chance, use the video.smoothing = true ? by looking at the video, it seems this option is set to true ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] h264 video looks blurry/crappy in flash
The video i am using has the same size as the stage area so no scaling is taking place. smoothing = true normally activates antialiasing if the video is scaled up/down. However weird things hapens with h264 - with smoothing 'on' the image gets too soft and to some degree degrades the picture. With smoothing 'off' it leaves the video very rough and aliased as if the video had been scaled up from 1/4th the resolution. I have been testing on osx 10.4 safari/ff and 9.0.115 fp Cheers, B) Søren MOTION INTERACTIVITY dslnc studio - www.desilence.net +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) On Oct 24, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Cedric Muller wrote: do you, by any chance, use the video.smoothing = true ? by looking at the video, it seems this option is set to true ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
[Flashcoders] h264 video looks blurry/crappy in flash
Hey All Has anybody experieced h264 video being more crappy when played through flash instead of i.e. the quicktime player If you compare these two: In flash http://agentzoo.dk/temp/videotests/?file=mp4/ bancpost720_16-9.mp4w=702h=394 the file directly: http://agentzoo.dk/temp/videotests/mp4/bancpost720_16-9.mp4 You will see a big quality differece - Notice how blurry the video and subtitles looks and how compressed the text and logo looks in flash. The video has carefully been compressed in episode with flash compatible settings... Cheers, B) Søren MOTION INTERACTIVITY dslnc studio - www.desilence.net +34 93 268 0953 / +34 61 555 9963 (mobile) ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] The great CS3 Swindle
Yes it is totally f*ckd up - production bundle upgrade: us: $1199 / €897 eu/spain: $2630 / €1967 So guess which side of the atlantic i am buying my upgrade ;-) Cheers, B) Søren On Mar 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Joe Wheeler wrote: Has anyone checked out the international prices on CS3? I can hardly believe how badly the UK is getting fleeced. I'm upgrading from CS1 Creative Suite and Studio 8 to CS3 Design Premium. In the US that's $599.00 dollars, but in the UK pounds it works out to £703.82. Take the exchange rate into account and UK customers are paying... 1,384.51 USD!!! Sales tax in the UK is 17.5% but the Adobe price hike is a whopping 231% - W T F? ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] Localization issue with XML
if it isnt a coded textfield you need to define each special character using the 'embed' button in the inspector (while the tf is selected) in the 'include these charecters' field Cheers, B) Søren On Mar 21, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Måns Asplund wrote: Hi Steven! I had the same problem with swedish letters (å ä ö) and the solution was easy and obvious. I wrote something about it, just can´t find it now (not at the office at the moment). I´ll send the soloution as soon as I´m back at the office. |.Måns 2007/3/20, Nimrod Huberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Im not sure it's the right direction but you can try: system.useCodepage=true; Nimrod -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Sacks | BLITZ Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:32 PM To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: [Flashcoders] Localization issue with XML Hey Flashcoders, I'm having an issue with special characters not showing up from other languages, such as German (ü, ö, etc.). The issue is specifically with text loaded in from XML. The textfields are set to embed all latin glyphs (1076 glyphs, Uppercase, Lowercase, Numerals, Punctuation, Latin I, Latin Extended A, Latin Extended B, and Latin Extended Add'l). All text is wrapped in CDATA tags. I've tried saving the xml file with 8 bit and UTF-8 encoding and neither works. XML header is ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ? If I set the text of the textfield with Actionscript to a string with those characters in it, no problem, they all show up just fine. // This works txt.htmlText = wofür benötigen; However, when I display it from the XML, they show up as regular o and u characters. // Does not work item![CDATA[wofür benötigen]]/item Any ideas? Thanks, Steven ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] Anyone hate flash 9 already?
I skipped that :/ habit with the transition to flash 5 back then. But sometimes between bigger projects, flash banner campaigns lands on my table and for the most part they need to be compiled in flash 6 format. But after some testing it is not limited to flash 6 but is also 7 and 8 exported as AS2. Though it seems to be a osx intel issue only. Just pretty weird that the the fp8 inside flash 8 via rosetta is performing better than the native fp9 Some as3 examples i have seen here and there performs rather bad as well - anything less than around 60 fps or the elements move with very jerky motion, movements that would have been smooth with max 30fps in fp8- (it is not a cpu/ram issue - the workstation is loaded) Cheers B) Søren On 13/02/07 23:25, Arseniy Shklyaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: U mean u publish them for player 8 with AS1? I did published my 6 player games from 8 flash as for 6 player too. Cua they didnt work when publish to 8 player but I thought it was cuz I used ../: /: instead of _parent and _root ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] Anyone hate flash 9 already?
well utf8 support is taking care of that already :-) On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:09 PM, dan wrote: I wish apon a star that flash 9 will have RTL text for us non English people :) shalom ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] Anyone hate flash 9 already?
Now speaking about flash 9 - I am experiencing some odd behaviors with fp9 player: flash 6 to 8 swf files with as1 or keyframe animation just performs slower. If i want my animations to move just as smooth in the fp9 i need to export them with more or less the double framete before fp9 shows them rather ok. at least it is an issue on my intel mac with the newest fp9 player. Have anybody experienced something similar? Cheers, B) Søren On Feb 13, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Arseniy Shklyaev wrote: Why to be specific in such a question? I just dont like flash more and more. Intuitive feel. Perhaps cuz I do only games... On 2/13/07, Alias™ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you be more specific as to why one might do so? Curious, Alias On 13/02/07, Arseniy Shklyaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone hate flash 9 already? -- -Arseniy Shklyaev ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com -- -Arseniy Shklyaev ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] How to get good photo quality images in flash from photoshop, my tiny tutorial..
The gamma integration with Flash 8 and Photoshop really sucks so... (no ICC compability) Another way is to work directly in your monitor colour space (given that it is calibrated properly). That way you will get no suprises...at least not on your monitor If you need some really optimized jpgs _dont_ use the build in jpg exporter in flash. Optimize the jpg in your favourite app (photoshop is good enough for me). Flash can use imported jpgs without recompressing them. Cheers, B) Søren On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Tomas Nygren wrote: Hi! I had great problems with this How to really get good quality images in flash, of course importing jpgs dosent work so I'm aheading into just importing .psd files and then specifying in the flash to compress them as 95% (yes large files but I dont know any else better procedure) The gamma integration with Flash 8 and Photoshop really sucks so... (no ICC compability) Then I thought to make a tutorial for my own to see what kind of procedure I can develop: http://tomasnygren.com/tutorials/images_to_flash/ what do you think, any comments? still I think I will get better results from this procedue and faster instead of changing the images with individual settings each time, since the changes are always so similar.. best Tomas Nygren ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] Flash 8.5 for Linux
...well not in my mail proggie :p On 15/2/06 23:02, John Dowdell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TIP: If you hit New Mail in your emailer and paste the mailing list address in, then you'll start a new thread and will be visible to other readers. (On this note you actually hit Reply to a conversation titled htmlText + rollover, so only people looking at uncollapsed threads will even seen see your subject line or my reply.) Summary: Hit Reply when replying, New when new... increases your visibility. Gerry Creighton wrote: I searched the list for this info but didn't find anything. Does anyone know when the Flash 8.5 player will be available for Linux. I recently launched a site that requires Flash 8.0.22 and I've had a couple inquiries from some linux users. No date estimated yet, although more info on Linux Players is here: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/emmy/archives/2005/12/why_isnt_there.cfm http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/12/flash-player-8-for-linux-update.html (The comments to Tinic's blog were apparently a campaign target... lots of me too! posts mixed amid the actual conversation.) For background info on what makes Linux so difficult for compact, predictable multi-media engines, see Tinic's post from last summer: http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/08/porting-flash-player-to-alternative.html jd ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
Re: [Flashcoders] Is this site legit to buy the software???
Good question. I dont know. But it definitely is worrying that they give you no possibilities but a online forum to get in thouch with them. No adress nor phone, email nada... On 9/2/06 17:45, Jason Je [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody know if this site is legit or is it one of those warez site??? http://www.tekdealers.com/?pg=product_detailsref=956846552productID=374 Thank you... CyanBlue This message (including any attachments) is a confidential and privileged communication of AWS Convergence Technologies, Inc. and intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorized use, distribution or copying of this message (or any attachment) is prohibited. If you are not the addressee or a person authorized to receive messages for the addressee, you have received this message in error. In that case, please delete this message and call us at 301-250-4000 so that we can correct our records in order to avoid this mistake in the future. Thank you. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] IE on mac documentation
On 9/1/06 21:46, JesterXL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New macs since Safari came out didn't ship with IE so he must be using an older OS as well. Thats not true, IE is present on both panther(os 10.3.x) and tiger (os 10.4.x) - look in the 'applications' folder. ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: OT [Flashcoders] Flash 8 and Rosetta -- MacIntel
well, lets see some head to head real-world benchmarls first ;-) On 10/1/06 21:10, eric dolecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With Rosetta it would run 80-85% as fast as normal... but those machines are 2-4x faster now... so even in emulation would run snappy as doody :) edolecki On 1/10/06, dls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know older versions of the Flash Player ran faster on Windows machines. I'm hoping for some of those speed gains now. I just hope that the Flash authoring environment runs without having to shell out money for an upgrade. --dan I'd say it would run very well... edolecki On 1/10/06, Rich Rodecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i would imagine it would...thats what the emulator is for. The mroe important question is will it run well? On 1/10/06, dls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know if Flash8 will run on the new Intel-based Macs? If you haven't heard the news, visit apple.com --dan ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] xml, atomic values, special chars
Well, - make sure your xml file (dynamic or 'physical') is utf-8 encoded. - And make sure your textfield uses a typeface that supports your desired special characthers. - And if the typeface is being embedded make sure that you embed the special charaters as well. Cheers, B) Søren On 1/12/05 17:58, Ramon Tayag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tried it just now - strange.. I read before that using those tags forces the text to stay the way it is. Any other suggestions? Thank you! On 12/2/05, Mike Boutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried somethign like a attrib=name1![CDATA[This is the atmoic value. It's so cool]]/a Ramon Tayag wrote: Hey everyone, How do I properly render text that was pulled from an atomic value? For example, here's the node: a attrib=name1This is the atomic value. It's so cool./a Getting the child node of that node a and tracing it in flash gives me: This is the atomic value. Itapos;s so cool. How do I get it to print out the normal apostrophe? Thanks, -- Ramon Miguel M. Tayag ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders -- Ramon Miguel M. Tayag ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Re: [Flashcoders] Flvs fail to stream on an older pc
Hi Karina I have had similar problems like you. My cd-rom in question had 2 videos (both external flvs to profit f7's smaller memory footprint advantage over f6 regarding videos) Both videos was rather big in pixel size and approx 3 mins length (about 30 megabytes each). So i knew they would demand a bit of 'juice'. When testing with a 'raw' video test both a mac g4 500mhz (os9 and osx) and a p3 600mhz (both win2k + win 98) worked fine with no performance problems playing from a cd. But my version with the final design was demanding quite alot more cpu to perform well. What i found out was that the pure presence of bitmap graphics with alpha information was decreasing the performance (demanding more cpu) - even though the bitmap wasn't moving or something was moving over or under it. I still couldn't optimize it fully to fit my 'raw' tests - but it put down the performance needs to a acceptable level. My minimum specs ended up at mac: g4 800mhz pc: p3 800mhz (both 64mb ram) I had other strange problems like sound issues with some pcs - some dell configurations with sound blaster live soundcards and a certain motherboards and cd-rom drive for some reason distorted the sound. (similar to the sound issues with flash 5 and soundblaster pci 64 and 128) but thing like this is out of your hands. But well with cd-rom productions there always are some odd hw configurations that just give problems (although in theory it shouldn't). Using director would just giver other issues (and make the production a lot more expensive due to the lack of cross platform projector exporting back then). Flash gave us the unique feature to distribute video cross platform without being dependent of 3rd party media players. All in all the cd-rom was a success and went into its 2 edition with a total of 70.000 units. Cheers, B) Søren DESIGN // INTERACTIVITY // MOTION // VISUALS +34 667 812 329 (ES) // +45 3694 8614 (DK) www.RGBAZ.com // www.DESILENCE.net On 24/11/05 17:26, Karina Steffens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List, I'm on the last stages of development of an educational CD-Rom in FlashMX 2004. The application uses a v2 media component loads flvs from the CD-Rom. It's been developed on a pc (XP) and then zipped over and burned on the Mac (OSX) and set to the client. The client has an old mac and an even older PC (which still uses windows 98...). The CD-Rom loads on both, but the flvs seem to work on her mac but not on the pc (except for one or two). She also says that an earlier version of the CD-Rom that I sent her does work, which is puzzling. Also, there is a little test utility just for the Flvs on the CD-Rom, and that also works. My application loads various swfs into a base swf file, and the flvs are loaded to that, so it could be a memory thing. I can't run any of the tests myself, because I'm based in Dublin and she is in London, so I don't know what to do. I tried to tell her that her PC is just too old for the software, and I still haven't got any data from her about how much memory it has. She's not very technical. Does anyone have any ideas, solutions or minimum specs for this problem? Thanks, Karina Karina Steffens | Neo-Archaic creative technical new media design http://www.neo-archaic.net/ www.neo-archaic.net ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
[Flashcoders] win xp and firewire issues with flash
Hi all I have made a video broadcaster for a webcast project. The broadcast computers are pcs with win xp wih video via firewire. Though, I have some really weird issues with win xp, dv camera (canon - connected via firewire) and the flash player. (Everything work fine on mac though...) The video feed works fine in other applications - just not with my flash video broadcaster. I found a macromedia technote for breeze?! that stated some issues with sp2. But that it could be fixed with replacing some drivers with the same from sp1 (didn't work) http://www.macromedia.com/go/tn_19568 I downgraded the machines to xp Sp1 having the same problem - no video feed via firewire is getting through to the flash player... I have been goog'ling around to find a solution with no luck so far and a more than open to suggestions how to come around this. Anybody from Macromedia who got some inside knowledge regarding this? Thanks in advance :-) Best regards, Søren Christensen DESIGN // INTERACTIVITY // MOTION // VISUALS +34 667 812 329 (ES) // +45 3694 8614 (DK) www.RGBAZ.com // www.DESILENCE.net ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
