Re: [Flashcoders] New wrinkle in IE activation issue...

2006-04-20 Thread dancedrummer
This issue applies to all three activeX controls i use + Flash.

On 4/20/06, elibol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've modified it to transfer FlashVars
>
> http://anticipatechange.com/huseyin/patentMagic/
>
>
> On 4/20/06, Kevin Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > All I'm doing to try and keep the objects from loading is defining all
> > objects with display:none - is there a more reliable way to prevent
> > objects from loading in the background? I took a quick look on msdn for
> > some ActiveX magic method, but wasn't able to find anything.
> >
> > It looks like it does loose the values of some of the params
> > unfortunately. If there is a way around that, I'd be happy to implement
> > it.
> >
> > Kevin N.
> >
> >
> > elibol wrote:
> > > It doesn't seem to Geoff, I tested it with a 100%x100% object:
> > >
> > > http://anticipatechange.com/huseyin/shifty.html
> > >
> > > The object tag has noscale params, there is one problem though, it seems
> > as
> > > if the replaced objects appear to still be loading from the browsers
> > > perspective.
> > >
> > > Besides this, seems like a reliable exploit so far. Nice job Kevin.
> > >
> > > M.
> > >
> > > On 4/20/06, elibol < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Would it make sense for this to work with all Active X Objects? The
> > idea
> > >> is to override object activation by rewriting the objects after the
> > document
> > >> is loaded? Is this a hole in the activation process, where it will only
> > >> force activation when the page is being initialized? Objects written
> > after
> > >> the page is loaded slip through?
> > >>
> > >> M.
> > >>
> > >> On 4/20/06, Kevin Newman < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> I didn't want to have to redefine all the stuff that has already been
> > >>> defined in the html object. So I made this: :-)
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.unfocus.com/projects/PatentMagic/
> > >>>
> > >>> A super tiny js file include and a stylesheet takes care of all object
> > >>> activation. It's a bit brute force, but it should get the job done if
> > >>> you are looking for a quick fix and are using static embedded html. If
> > >>> anyone has any ideas on how to make this more robust, please let me
> > >>> know. :-)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Kevin N.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Geoff Stearns wrote:
> > >>>
> >  you could do this with flashobject really easily.
> > 
> >  just call fo.write() whenever you want and it will replace the object
> >  you target with your flash movie.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  On Apr 20, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Kevin Newman wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > I prefer solutions that try to hide IE's lack of conformity, like
> > > Dean Edwards's IE 7 script:
> > > http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/
> > >
> > > There are just too many installations to realistically ignore them.
> > >
> > > Speaking of hacking on IE, is there a way to prevent an object from
> > > loading? By that I mean, I want to use Object tags to embed a Swf,
> > > but I don't want it to download or load in the background until I
> > > tell it to via a script interaction (vbscript or javascript). Will
> > > hiding it via css do the trick, or will I need to take further steps
> > > to keep it from loading?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Kevin N.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> > To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
> >
> > Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> > Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> > http://www.figleaf.com
> > http://training.figleaf.com
> >
> ___
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


[Flashcoders] MovieClipLoader

2005-12-09 Thread dancedrummer
I'm running into a problem that only occurs with Flash8.  I have a swf that
loads additions swf's with a MovieClipLoader object.  The first time I hit
the page it works fine.  On subsequent tries when the external swf's have
been cached in the browser they are not getting recognized as being loaded
by the MCLoader object.  Is not an issue with Flash7.  Anybody here know
anything about this?
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] Someone knows about strange behaviour of window component on internet explorer?

2005-12-09 Thread dancedrummer
i think you want to use onLoadInit . . . . . .

On 11/30/05, eugen pflüger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
> could this be a flash bug on internet explorer?
>
> I have a movieclip with a lot of buttons that create different
> windows with different content. The swfs loaded into the windows have
> an onLoad method where more components are initialized. The problem
> is as follows:
>
> When loading the swf, the window component is shown as a small window
> until the swf loads inside (then the window gets resized), so I added
> a "complete" event listener so when the window reports finalized the
> loading process I can make the window visible.
> Nevertheless, I've found that in Internet Explorer, sometimes, the
> onLoad method occurs AFTER the "complete" event has been launched and
> not before as it should be (the event is generated before the swf has
> finished loading), the result is the window appearing before it is
> supposed to, showing uninitialized components in a very "buggy" way..
> this problem occurs only in internet explorer on pc (not in firefox
> or safari or netscape on mac)
>
> has somebody encountered this too? or does someone has an bugfix /
> workaorund?
> i always thought that the flash player runs stable on all systems...sigh
>
>
>
> tia
> eugen
>
>
> ___
> Flashcoders mailing list
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders