Re: [Flashcoders] remoting v service

2005-12-14 Thread Al Veldhuis

Hey Gavin,

An option you could try out is Emissary from FlashLink Solutions. I have 
been working with it for a short while now and it works pretty well.


Its not exactly flash remoting but it is really easy to get data to and 
from a MS SQL server in Windows. I believe the URL is 
http://www.flashlinksolutions.com.


Just as a suggestion. They have a free trial.

Al

Gavin Lilley wrote:


 javascript:setIrrelevant(1573074);
Due to changes beyond my control, I am now working on a M$ .NET/MSSQL server
and need to migrate my old php/mysql code over. The php code includes AMFPHP
Remoting classes.

I am looking at either porting the classes into ASP Remoting or creating a
set of wsdl Web services.

Can anyone give me any insight into why they would use one technology over
the other please?

I have read that the two technologies combined work well, I dont understand
this as I see a web service as an alternative to remoting - am I missing
something here?

--
Gavin Lilley
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 




___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


[Flashcoders] remoting v service

2005-12-12 Thread Gavin Lilley
  javascript:setIrrelevant(1573074);
Due to changes beyond my control, I am now working on a M$ .NET/MSSQL server
and need to migrate my old php/mysql code over. The php code includes AMFPHP
Remoting classes.

I am looking at either porting the classes into ASP Remoting or creating a
set of wsdl Web services.

Can anyone give me any insight into why they would use one technology over
the other please?

I have read that the two technologies combined work well, I dont understand
this as I see a web service as an alternative to remoting - am I missing
something here?

--
Gavin Lilley
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


RE: [Flashcoders] remoting v service

2005-12-12 Thread Scott Hyndman
All the .NET remoting software costs money, but it is quite a bit
faster.
Web services are easy and free, but slower.

And you're right, they are alternatives. You could use .NET remoting to
connect to web services that would ordinarily be unavailable to
Flash...maybe that's what they mean.

Scott

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gavin
Lilley
Sent: December 12, 2005 5:11 AM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: [Flashcoders] remoting v service

  javascript:setIrrelevant(1573074);
Due to changes beyond my control, I am now working on a M$ .NET/MSSQL
server and need to migrate my old php/mysql code over. The php code
includes AMFPHP Remoting classes.

I am looking at either porting the classes into ASP Remoting or creating
a set of wsdl Web services.

Can anyone give me any insight into why they would use one technology
over the other please?

I have read that the two technologies combined work well, I dont
understand this as I see a web service as an alternative to remoting -
am I missing something here?

--
Gavin Lilley
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders