RE: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-21 Thread zwetan
>
> just a quick test under vmware:
>
> ubuntu 4.10: firefox 1.04: w/o image : WORKS
> w image : CRASH
>
> i wonder why you cannot for the sake reproduce this. i really wonder.
> ...
> files:
> http://onupdate.de/
>
> should crash OSX-browsers (at least <10.4) too.
>

I'm just saying if you want improvement in this situation
That you should take the time to provide any necessary informations
to the people concerned the most by this crash
and who can help you solve it

really contact Macromedia, explain them the crash you're experiencing
and provide them link, source code, fla, as, whatever is necessary
for them to help you solve those crash

zwetan




___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread ryanm
if a feature is sometimes working and sometimes not, what shall we call it 
in your opinion ? Lazy ?


   When I'm feeling generous, I would call the linux Flash player a 
prematurely released beta. That's about it.


ryanm 


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Michael Stuhr

zwetan schrieb:






No offense too



just a quick test under vmware:

ubuntu 4.10: firefox 1.04: w/o image : WORKS
w image : CRASH

i wonder why you cannot for the sake reproduce this. i really wonder.
...
files:
http://onupdate.de/

should crash OSX-browsers (at least <10.4) too.

micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


RE: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread zwetan

> >
> > How about reporting reproducible steps of the bug here and someone
> > will get it to the engineers to look at? If its a crashing bug, like
> > you have said, and it is reproducible, then please post it up.
> > Otherwise, like Stan said, this indeed comes across like a rant.
> >
> didn't you read the whole thread ? i posted those steps, no ?
>

No offense too

But the steps you had provided are no use to do a debug or a test

This as a dev on any app would be classified
As
NEED MORE INFO
NOT REPRODUCIBLE
Or
NOT A BUG

If you can not provide a crashing file either in source code
Or FLA source or well defined steps to reproduce the bugs

AND

the machine/os/system configuration where those crashing occurs

This "crashing" will never be solved

Dev can not solve bugs they can not tests and/or reproduce
That's all, not even need to complain or rant

zwetan



___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Michael Stuhr

Eric E. Dolecki schrieb:
I didn't read that far down. So one of us will try to reproduce your  
bug and send it in to MM. Thanks.


Eric



that would be nice. i didn't say this, but it never ever crashed on windoze, not 
on IE not on WinFF not WinOpera, but all browsers i and my clients could get my 
hands on, for Linux and OSX (~ 10.39) crashed.




micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Eric E. Dolecki
I didn't read that far down. So one of us will try to reproduce your  
bug and send it in to MM. Thanks.


Eric



On Oct 20, 2005, at 7:38 AM, Michael Stuhr wrote:


Eric E. Dolecki schrieb:


micha,
How about reporting reproducible steps of the bug here and  
someone  will get it to the engineers to look at? If its a  
crashing bug, like  you have said, and it is reproducible, then  
please post it up.  Otherwise, like Stan said, this indeed comes  
across like a rant.



didn't you read the whole thread ? i posted those steps, no ?

micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders



___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Michael Stuhr

Eric E. Dolecki schrieb:

micha,

How about reporting reproducible steps of the bug here and someone  
will get it to the engineers to look at? If its a crashing bug, like  
you have said, and it is reproducible, then please post it up.  
Otherwise, like Stan said, this indeed comes across like a rant.



didn't you read the whole thread ? i posted those steps, no ?

micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Eric E. Dolecki

micha,

How about reporting reproducible steps of the bug here and someone  
will get it to the engineers to look at? If its a crashing bug, like  
you have said, and it is reproducible, then please post it up.  
Otherwise, like Stan said, this indeed comes across like a rant.


Eric Dolecki


On Oct 20, 2005, at 7:04 AM, Michael Stuhr wrote:


Stan Vassilev schrieb:

If you strongly complain about the bug but don't want to help with  
material to get it reproduced and fixed, should I consider this  
post a "rant" :)?

Anyway, up to you, of course.




no offense mate, but if i'd say this to my customers, i'd get  
fired. point.


micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders



___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Michael Stuhr

Stan Vassilev schrieb:
If you strongly complain about the bug but don't want to help with material 
to get it reproduced and fixed, should I consider this post a "rant" :)?

Anyway, up to you, of course.



no offense mate, but if i'd say this to my customers, i'd get fired. point.

micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Stan Vassilev
If you strongly complain about the bug but don't want to help with material 
to get it reproduced and fixed, should I consider this post a "rant" :)?

Anyway, up to you, of course.

Regards, Stan Vassilev


Stan Vassilev schrieb:

Trust me the MM engineers are definitely interested in fixing crash bugs.
If you can provide files where they see this happen it'll help a lot.



i'd like to trust you, no problem, but i have no will to spend my time on 
bug-fixing. i should say, that i believe the bug is there, maybe not in te 
player itself but in my app. there is a chance that i took an unusual way 
to get what i wanted, but either if this is the case: it's an enourmous 
bug, since i told my client they'd be able to change those files by 
themselves with little knowledge of html, which they have.


micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders 


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Michael Stuhr

Stan Vassilev schrieb:

Trust me the MM engineers are definitely interested in fixing crash bugs.
If you can provide files where they see this happen it'll help a lot.



i'd like to trust you, no problem, but i have no will to spend my time on 
bug-fixing. i should say, that i believe the bug is there, maybe not in te 
player itself but in my app. there is a chance that i took an unusual way to get 
what i wanted, but either if this is the case: it's an enourmous bug, since i 
told my client they'd be able to change those files by themselves with little 
knowledge of html, which they have.


micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Stan Vassilev

Trust me the MM engineers are definitely interested in fixing crash bugs.
If you can provide files where they see this happen it'll help a lot.

So far I've seen images wrongly positioned, but not crashing the player, so 
you may have something specific going on there which will be hard to 
reproduce with just that description.




I did this in summer this year. Nobody was really interested. have no 
example at hand right now but summary is:


i have an app that shows different states like tabs. each time you choose 
a new tab, a html is loaded via xml.load() into a textarea (v2). this html 
sometimes contains  tags, and the fonts are embedded as i said 
earlier. on Linux and OSX it crashes (to be more precise: on linux it 
freezes until it at last crashes :-) ) every browser, reproducable. I have 
then tried un-embedded fonts (sans) but the results were the same. i than 
read somehwere in the coders archives (sorray no link here) that others 
had this problems too (since v6 ?), and it had to do with the images, so i 
deleted all  tags and woosh! no crashes anymore. It's that simple. i 
wonder why nobody else has seen this before.


greets

micha

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders 


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Michael Stuhr

Stan Vassilev schrieb:
Can you please post a sample that does this? If you found a way to crash the 
OSX player a reproducible sample can be given to the engineers to fix it.
It's not as if the Windows version is perfect and Macromedia doesn't care 
for OSX or Linux, but bugs happen, and then are fixed.


You can also post about it in the forums of Macromedia Labs if you want.




I did this in summer this year. Nobody was really interested. have no example at 
hand right now but summary is:


i have an app that shows different states like tabs. each time you choose a new 
tab, a html is loaded via xml.load() into a textarea (v2). this html sometimes 
contains  tags, and the fonts are embedded as i said earlier. on Linux and 
OSX it crashes (to be more precise: on linux it freezes until it at last crashes 
:-) ) every browser, reproducable. I have then tried un-embedded fonts (sans) 
but the results were the same. i than read somehwere in the coders archives 
(sorray no link here) that others had this problems too (since v6 ?), and it had 
to do with the images, so i deleted all  tags and woosh! no crashes 
anymore. It's that simple. i wonder why nobody else has seen this before.


greets

micha

___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Stan Vassilev
Can you please post a sample that does this? If you found a way to crash the 
OSX player a reproducible sample can be given to the engineers to fix it.
It's not as if the Windows version is perfect and Macromedia doesn't care 
for OSX or Linux, but bugs happen, and then are fixed.


You can also post about it in the forums of Macromedia Labs if you want.




i wouldn't, i'm not even telling thwm that OSX is supported.
(Since embedded images in textfields with embedded fonts crashes nearly 
all browsers on OSX.)


micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders 


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Michael Stuhr

ryanm schrieb:

buggy. you should ask them. they know best.



I wouldn't call it buggy, I would call it an incomplete implementation. 


if a feature is sometimes working and sometimes not, what shall we call it in 
your opinion ? Lazy ?



Do yourself a favor and don't tell your customers that linux is supported.






i wouldn't, i'm not even telling thwm that OSX is supported.
(Since embedded images in textfields with embedded fonts crashes nearly all 
browsers on OSX.)


micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-20 Thread Stan Vassilev
You know Microsoft isn't even tagreting Linux with WPF/E as far as I know. 
It targets mobiles, older Windows OS and Mac.


Even Firefox has some truly weird bugs on Linux which aren't present on 
either Windows or Mac (I've tested Ubuntu which comes with Firefox). Linux 
is just... not the best Desktop OS to develop stuff for (yet).


(but it's the best mainstream server technology when coupled with Apache / 
PHP as far as I'm concerned)


Regards, Stan Vassilev


buggy. you should ask them. they know best.

   I wouldn't call it buggy, I would call it an incomplete implementation. 
Do yourself a favor and don't tell your customers that linux is supported.


ryanm
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders 


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-19 Thread ryanm

buggy. you should ask them. they know best.

   I wouldn't call it buggy, I would call it an incomplete implementation. 
Do yourself a favor and don't tell your customers that linux is supported.


ryanm 


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-19 Thread Mark Winterhalder
> 1. slower
> 2. right-click context menu looks funny and takes a second or two to
> pop up sometimes
> 3. sound doesn't work sometimes (though this may be my fault)
> 4. text rendering problems: on some sites, dynamic text doesn't show
> up. This may be a browser problem, but I think it's flash.
> 5. focus problems - sometimes i can't seem to get the flash movie to
> recieve keyboard focus.

6. xml socket jams when receiving data in quick order
7. flash is always rendered on top

i believe the text rendering problem are fonts that the developer
didn't include because of the false assumption they would be present
on all systems. not sure, though.

as for standalone, pf8 and fp8.5 work well with wine, as far as i have tested.

can't wait for a new linux plugin -- yes, 8.5 preferably.
unfortunately it will probably take a while, considering the job for
principal engineer for the linux player is still open:
http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/hr/reqs/engineering/2907br.html

(link taken from this very informative blog post which happens to be
relevant for this discussion:
http://www.kaourantin.net/2005/08/porting-flash-player-to-alternative.html
btw, Tinic's blog is great. go read it now if you haven't yet.)

mark


On 10/20/05, David Rorex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/19/05, Michael Stuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > eric dolecki schrieb:
> > >Is the FP7 for Linux pretty solid? Has anyone tried it - and it looks like
> > >its plugin only, no standalone. Which is okay I guess.
> > >
> > buggy. you should ask them. they know best.
> >
>
> I believe there is a FP6 standalone for linux, but FP7 is plugin only
> afaik. It is slower, and has a couple of bugs, compared to its windows
> counterpart. Main problems I've had with it:
>
> 1. slower
> 2. right-click context menu looks funny and takes a second or two to
> pop up sometimes
> 3. sound doesn't work sometimes (though this may be my fault)
> 4. text rendering problems: on some sites, dynamic text doesn't show
> up. This may be a browser problem, but I think it's flash.
> 5. focus problems - sometimes i can't seem to get the flash movie to
> recieve keyboard focus.
>
> -David R
> ___
> Flashcoders mailing list
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>


--
http://snafoo.org/
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-19 Thread David Rorex
On 10/19/05, Michael Stuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eric dolecki schrieb:
> >Is the FP7 for Linux pretty solid? Has anyone tried it - and it looks like
> >its plugin only, no standalone. Which is okay I guess.
> >
> buggy. you should ask them. they know best.
>

I believe there is a FP6 standalone for linux, but FP7 is plugin only
afaik. It is slower, and has a couple of bugs, compared to its windows
counterpart. Main problems I've had with it:

1. slower
2. right-click context menu looks funny and takes a second or two to
pop up sometimes
3. sound doesn't work sometimes (though this may be my fault)
4. text rendering problems: on some sites, dynamic text doesn't show
up. This may be a browser problem, but I think it's flash.
5. focus problems - sometimes i can't seem to get the flash movie to
recieve keyboard focus.

-David R
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-19 Thread Michael Stuhr

eric dolecki schrieb:


Is the FP7 for Linux pretty solid? Has anyone tried it - and it looks like
its plugin only, no standalone. Which is okay I guess.

e.dolecki

 


buggy. you should ask them. they know best.

micha
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-19 Thread Stan Vassilev
given 8.5 is out in uhmm... dunno but less than year, it make more sense to 
me that they skip 8.0 for linux and go for 8.5 ..



On 10/19/05, eric dolecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
whats the current rev of flash to run on linux? any plans for fp8 for 
linux?

etc...


flash player 7 on linux. they are working on flash player 8, but it's
going to be quite a while. i think it was last month or two they were
trying to hire someone to work on it for them. I wouldn't expect it
for at least 6 months. (fp7 for linux came out like 8+ months after
fp7 for windows IIRC)

-David R
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders 


___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-19 Thread eric dolecki
Is the FP7 for Linux pretty solid? Has anyone tried it - and it looks like
its plugin only, no standalone. Which is okay I guess.

e.dolecki

On 10/19/05, David Rorex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/19/05, eric dolecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > whats the current rev of flash to run on linux? any plans for fp8 for
> linux?
> > etc...
>
> flash player 7 on linux. they are working on flash player 8, but it's
> going to be quite a while. i think it was last month or two they were
> trying to hire someone to work on it for them. I wouldn't expect it
> for at least 6 months. (fp7 for linux came out like 8+ months after
> fp7 for windows IIRC)
>
> -David R
> ___
> Flashcoders mailing list
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders


Re: [Flashcoders] flash & linux

2005-10-19 Thread David Rorex
On 10/19/05, eric dolecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whats the current rev of flash to run on linux? any plans for fp8 for linux?
> etc...

flash player 7 on linux. they are working on flash player 8, but it's
going to be quite a while. i think it was last month or two they were
trying to hire someone to work on it for them. I wouldn't expect it
for at least 6 months. (fp7 for linux came out like 8+ months after
fp7 for windows IIRC)

-David R
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders