RE: [flexcoders] FDS 2.0

2006-08-18 Thread Jeff Whatcott













Correct.  We do not license by the core. 
We license by the physical processor.

 









From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of hank williams
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006
10:16 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] FDS 2.0



 







I presume here that core 2 Duo = 1 cpu not 2 cpu's
correct?

Hank



On 8/18/06, Cathy
Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com
> wrote:





Per the license,

 

1.9 "Per-CPU" 
The total number of CPUs on the Computers used to operate the Software may not
exceed the licensed quantity of CPUs.  For purposes of this definition,
all CPUs on a Computer on which the Software is installed shall be deemed to
operate the Software unless Customer configures that Computer (using a reliable
and verifiable means of hardware or software partitioning) such that the total
number of CPUs that actually operate the Software is less than the total number
on that Computer.

 

You cannot install the
express version (1 CPU) on a machine with more than one CPU.  You can only
deploy it into single CPU machines.

 

- Cathy

 







From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com]
On Behalf Of João Fernandes
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 5:41
AM




To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: RE:
[flexcoders] FDS 2.0









 











You can use FDS express the very same way that
FDS departmental or Enterprise,
the only difference is that the express version cannot be deployed on a
clustered invironment and more than 1 CPU.

The only thing I never understood is if deployed
on  a 2 CPU server, express will only talk to a single CPU or if you can
only deploy it into single CPU machines. 

João Fernandes









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com] On Behalf Of Mika Kiljunen
Sent: sexta-feira, 18 de Agosto de
2006 9:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] FDS 2.0











Hi,

I need more info on this, since Adobe site claims "Flex
Data Services Express, a free product version of Flex Data Services 2, lets
developers deploy a single application on a single, nonclustered CPU to take
advantage of data services and messaging capabilities".

Does this mean, that if I download Flex Data Services
Express, I can develop using remote objects but I cannot release a commercial
service without FDS Enterprise license 

OR 

does it mean that Express does not even contain the remote
object support at all so that I can't even develop 'em with Express version and
need Enterprise
for development also? 

Latter would really change the development process, since
Enterprise costs so much that for small companies it would really mean one
central Enterprise version for all developers vs. Flex 1.5 model, where each
developer could have their own flex server ie. on laptop on developer mode.
This would really make things more complicated for developers. 

-Mika









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin
Sent: 16. elokuuta 2006 6:16 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] FDS 2.0











FDS Express does have the remote object support.  I
thought we were putting more info into the FAQ on the licenses but I can't find
it, I'll ask around.

Matt









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com] On Behalf Of Mika Kiljunen
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006
11:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] FDS 2.0











Hi,

It's
a bit unclear to me… does FDS 2.0 contain remote object support or is it
contained with Enterprise
license only? 

Hint…
Adobe could put more info to the Adobe site concerning the differences of FDS
licenses, please… J

-Mika



































 








__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Software development tool
  
  
Software development
  
  
Software development services
  
  


Home design software
  
  
Software development company
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___






RE: [flexcoders] Dual core license policy

2005-11-04 Thread Jeff Whatcott





Interesting discussion.  Our current licensing is by 
processor and we don't make any special distinction for dual core 
processors.  We're studying this closely right now, and of course we reserve the right 
to change our licensing policies in the future, but for now there is no 
distinction for dual core.   


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mika 
KiljunenSent: Friday, November 04, 2005 2:29 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Dual core license 
policy


I disagree with this, 
basically I still concider dual core CPU as a single CPU. If it’s counted as 2 
CPU’s on license policy then you’re better off having 2 separate CPU’s since 
they perform much better than the dual cores. If I remember correctly, Oracle 
counts dual cores as 1.5 processors and they round it upwards so 1 dual cores 
comes out as 2 and 2 dual cores comes out as 3. This also I think is just stupid 
J
 
At least Microsoft 
shows some sense counting a dual as a single processor. 

 
Still no comment from 
Macromedia?
 
-Mika
 




From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] 
On Behalf Of Clint 
ModienSent: 3. marraskuuta 
2005 18:25To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Dual core license 
policy
 

I disagree... for all interpretations of 
the definition at wikipedia it results in the same conclusion... 
 a dual-core cpu is 2 cpu's/processors.  That's the point.  A 
mobo with one dual core processor uses almost the same power as a mobo with 2 
separate processors.  All they managed to do was squeeze 2 cpu's on one 
die. 

 

It's 2 
cpu's. 

On 11/3/05, João Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote: 
Clint,
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_core 
 
 
Its seems that it 
depends on the point of view. What are we counting? the chip? or independent 
cores inside a chip? It seems that many are counting the chip himself no matter 
how many individual cores they have. It's up to Macromedia what's their point of 
view. 
 

 
João 
Fernandes
Secção de 
Desenvolvimento
Departamento de 
Informática

 
 



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Clint ModienSent: 
quinta-feira, 3 de Novembro de 2005 15:47To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Dual core license 
policy 

Actually Dave 
dual-core *is* 2 
physical processors. As opposed to Intel's Hyper Threading which is two 
"virutal" processors.  So if what you read is true... then Macromedia would 
consider dual core as 2 processors. 

On 11/3/05, Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 
wrote: 
On 11/3/05, Mika Kiljunen < 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the Macromedia's 
license policy on dual core processors? Is a single dual core processor 
calculated as 1, 1.5 or 2 processors ?>> I couldn't find this info 
anywhere, but I think it would be nice to know J >I can't 
remember where I read it, but I know for sure thatMacromedia's current 
policy is to use the number of *physical*processors in the server as the 
number. So a dual core would just beone processor. 
Regards,Dave. Yahoo! Groups 
Sponsor ~-->Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a 
job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.http://us.click.yahoo.com/A77XvD/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/nhFolB/TM~->--Flexcoders 
Mailing ListFAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch 
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! 
Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go 
to:   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/<*> To 
unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]<*> Your 
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

--Flexcoders Mailing ListFAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 



YAHOO! GROUPS 
LINKS 

 

   Visit your group "flexcoders" 
  on the web.  
   To unsubscribe from 
  this group, send an email to:  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   Your use of Yahoo! 
  Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
 









--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  
Macromedia flex
  
  


Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the

RE: [flexcoders] Flex 2 Alpha huge output swf

2005-10-17 Thread Jeff Whatcott
Check out this and other known issues here:

http://labs.macromedia.com/wiki/index.php/Flex:known_issues

Jeff Whatcott 

-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of kosirm2000
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:51 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Flex 2 Alpha huge output swf

First of all, I must congratulate macromedia labs team for flex2.
I was newer before so exited with expecting new software...

First of all, I've noticed that output swf is huge, empty has about
246 kb. Does anyone know if this is going to change in future?

Bye, Milan





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/nhFolB/TM
~-> 

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/nhFolB/TM
~-> 

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[flexcoders] Harley-Davidson Customizer Live with Flex

2005-10-10 Thread Jeff Whatcott





Check it out 
at:
 
http://www.harley-davidson.com/pr/gm/customizer/launchCustomizer.asp
 
Congratulations to 
the team at WhitmannHart for creating this beautiful Flex 
app.
 
Jeff 
Whatcott





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[flexcoders] Sherwin-Williams Flex app now live...

2005-05-04 Thread Jeff Whatcott





Sherwin-Williams 
recently launched their Color Visualizer application.  It was written in 
Flex by Whittman Hart, a Flex systems integration partner based in the Midwest 
US.  Check it out.
 
http://www.sherwin.com/do_it_yourself/
 
Jeff 
Whatcott
Macromedia







Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.