[flexcoders] Re: Lightweight framework

[zuurl8]

I would not assume that just because it exists that it is necessary.  
Preference is everything and the term overkill exists for a reason.

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, dnk d.k.emailli...@... wrote:

 
 On 18-Apr-09, at 10:07 PM, zuurl8 wrote:
 
  Flex is a lightweight framework. Do you need more then what Flex  
  provides in interface, events, and modules?
 
 
 Well I think that I am talking about things more like code structure,  
 methods of doing things, etc. There are obviously benefits from these  
 other frameworks, otherwise people would not have written them.
 
 I do understand where you are coming from, but in my case, I am  
 looking for something a little more than the Flex framework itself.
 
 d

[flexcoders] Re: Lightweight framework

[zuurl8]

Flex is a lightweight framework.  Do you need more then what Flex provides in 
interface, events, and modules?

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Dnk d.k.emailli...@... wrote:

 Go there,
 
 I know there have been a billion topics regarding frameworks on here.  
 I have been using cairngorm for a while and do like it. Now after  
 doing a few projects, I have come to the realization that pretty much  
 all projects I do are small - med with remoting. Cairngorm when  
 looking back at it, seems like overkill with a lot of code (for  
 projects my size- just hobby and personal projects).
 
 I like the code structure of frameworks and the advantages they offer,  
 but I just want to simplify a bit.
 
 But I am curious if anyone can recommend a light weight framework?
 
 D