Re: [flexcoders] CF flex2gateway vs JavaAdapter

2007-03-07 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Tuesday 06 Mar 2007, João Fernandes wrote:
> Rich, unfortunately if you work with Arrays of VO's you'll see that CF
> is lacking of performance comparing with Java. This is related with the
> overhead of creating CFCs.

CreateObject() calls in particular.

> Adobe is aware of the current low performance of CF when dealing with
> thousands of VO records.

But this is 'low relative performance' (compaired to Railo or BD) , as opposed 
to being so slow as to be unusable given a reasonably spec'ed server.
Mark Drew's blog has some graphs on it.

-- 
Tom Chiverton
Helping to authoritatively pursue professional architectures
On: http://thefalken.livejournal.com



This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St 
James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available 
for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation 
to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law 
Society.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups.  Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/kOt0.A/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM
~-> 

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Re: [flexcoders] CF flex2gateway vs JavaAdapter

2007-03-06 Thread João Fernandes
Rich, unfortunately if you work with Arrays of VO's you'll see that CF 
is lacking of performance comparing with Java. This is related with the 
overhead of creating CFCs.

Adobe is aware of the current low performance of CF when dealing with 
thousands of VO records.

João Fernandes




Re: [flexcoders] CF flex2gateway vs JavaAdapter

2007-03-06 Thread Rich Tretola
I wasn't really talking about the power of CF as I have been
developing CF for almost 10 years now.  It was more a question about
the different gateways and their speed.  I know they are both AMF but
is there any internal differences between accessing local java class
files running on the same J2EE instance vs remote ColdFusion cfcs?

Rich



On 05 Mar 2007 05:50:02 -0800, Tom Chiverton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 02 Mar 2007, Rich Tretola wrote:
> > To this point we have been using only FDS with a Java/Hibernate backend
> > using the JavaAdapter but are looking at ColdFusion for an upcoming
> > project.  My concerns are with performance.
>
> As I'm sure you know, ColdFusion compiles to Java bytecode, same as J2EE.
> It always ends up being a case of apples Vs. oranges, unfortunately when you
> try and compare something as nebulous as 'performance'.
>
> Suffice to say, many many high traffic sites use ColdFusion, including Adobe
> of course - who also put a lot of work into making sure Flex and ColdFusion
> play nice together.
>
> --
> Tom Chiverton
> Helping to assertively transform bleeding-edge systems
> On: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
>
> 
>
> This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
>
> Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
> Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at 
> St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is 
> available for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner 
> in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by 
> the Law Society.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY
>
> This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may 
> be confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must 
> not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor 
> inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence 
> or contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and 
> notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.
>
> For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rich Tretola

http://www.EverythingFlex.com


Re: [flexcoders] CF flex2gateway vs JavaAdapter

2007-03-05 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 02 Mar 2007, Rich Tretola wrote:
> To this point we have been using only FDS with a Java/Hibernate backend
> using the JavaAdapter but are looking at ColdFusion for an upcoming
> project.  My concerns are with performance.

As I'm sure you know, ColdFusion compiles to Java bytecode, same as J2EE. 
It always ends up being a case of apples Vs. oranges, unfortunately when you 
try and compare something as nebulous as 'performance'.

Suffice to say, many many high traffic sites use ColdFusion, including Adobe 
of course - who also put a lot of work into making sure Flex and ColdFusion 
play nice together.

-- 
Tom Chiverton
Helping to assertively transform bleeding-edge systems
On: http://thefalken.livejournal.com



This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St 
James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available 
for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation 
to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law 
Society.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/0It09A/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM
~-> 

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[flexcoders] CF flex2gateway vs JavaAdapter

2007-03-02 Thread Rich Tretola

Have there been any performance studies between using  a standard swf
connecting to  an internal ColdFusion server using the flex2gateway vs using
FDS with the JavaAdapter?

To this point we have been using only FDS with a Java/Hibernate backend
using the JavaAdapter but are looking at ColdFusion for an upcoming
project.  My concerns are with performance.

Anyone had any case studies on this?

Rich