Re: [flexcoders] robotlegs

2012-05-11 Thread Robert VanCuren Jr
I starting using robotlegs about a year ago and I really like it. It's by
far my favorite framework (mvc, dependency injection) for as3.

I have used it for pure as3 and flex projects.

As far as using it for small projects, it can be worthwhile because of the
convenience methods that it provides. It's also pretty easy to add
robotlegs to a project you have already started.


On Thursday, May 10, 2012, John McCormack wrote:

 **


 Hi there.

 I am about to start some small AS3 projects.

 I do like the idea of the structure that robotlegs offers and am
 considering whether to invest the time to get into it.

 Please let me know if...

 a) you use robotlegs and like it.
 b) you consider it worthwhile for small projects.

 Thanks

 John

  



Re: [flexcoders] robotlegs

2012-05-11 Thread John McCormack

Thanks Robert.
It has really good reports.
I was trying not to overcomplicate things but it certainly feels like a 
good way to go.

John


On 11/05/2012 17:39, Robert VanCuren Jr wrote:



I starting using robotlegs about a year ago and I really like it. It's 
by far my favorite framework (mvc, dependency injection) for as3.


I have used it for pure as3 and flex projects.

As far as using it for small projects, it can be worthwhile because of 
the convenience methods that it provides. It's also pretty easy to add 
robotlegs to a project you have already started.



On Thursday, May 10, 2012, John McCormack wrote:

Hi there.

I am about to start some small AS3 projects.

I do like the idea of the structure that robotlegs offers and am
considering whether to invest the time to get into it.

Please let me know if...

a) you use robotlegs and like it.
b) you consider it worthwhile for small projects.

Thanks

John








Re: [flexcoders] robotlegs

2012-05-11 Thread Rob Romanek
I've been using it since the beginning of the year. All though it can seem like 
it adds a layer of complication on small projects I have found that even on 
those when last minute changes came up they were easy to accommodate because of 
the structure implicit in the framework.

cheers,

Rob

On 2012-05-11, at 1:20 PM, John McCormack wrote:

 Thanks Robert.
 It has really good reports.
 I was trying not to overcomplicate things but it certainly feels like a good 
 way to go.
 John
 
 
 On 11/05/2012 17:39, Robert VanCuren Jr wrote:
 
 I starting using robotlegs about a year ago and I really like it. It's by 
 far my favorite framework (mvc, dependency injection) for as3.
 
 I have used it for pure as3 and flex projects.
 
 As far as using it for small projects, it can be worthwhile because of the 
 convenience methods that it provides. It's also pretty easy to add robotlegs 
 to a project you have already started.
 
 
 On Thursday, May 10, 2012, John McCormack wrote:
  
 Hi there.
 
 I am about to start some small AS3 projects.
 
 I do like the idea of the structure that robotlegs offers and am 
 considering whether to invest the time to get into it.
 
 Please let me know if...
 
 a) you use robotlegs and like it.
 b) you consider it worthwhile for small projects.
 
 Thanks
 
 John
 
 
 
 



Re: [flexcoders] robotlegs

2012-05-11 Thread John McCormack

Thanks Rob.

Those last minute changes being easy to make was mentioned in the last 
entry here for a 100 line project...


http://knowledge.robotlegs.org/discussions/questions/898-why-use-robotlegs-more-elaborate-explanation-than-the-book-gives-needed

Because my programs are quite small I wondered if it was overkill but I 
am really attracted by the structure and I am reassured by yours and Rob 
VanCuren's comments, so thank you both.


John

On 11/05/2012 19:10, Rob Romanek wrote:



I've been using it since the beginning of the year. All though it can 
seem like it adds a layer of complication on small projects I have 
found that even on those when last minute changes came up they were 
easy to accommodate because of the structure implicit in the framework.


cheers,

Rob

On 2012-05-11, at 1:20 PM, John McCormack wrote:


Thanks Robert.
It has really good reports.
I was trying not to overcomplicate things but it certainly feels like 
a good way to go.

John


On 11/05/2012 17:39, Robert VanCuren Jr wrote:

I starting using robotlegs about a year ago and I really like it. 
It's by far my favorite framework (mvc, dependency injection) for as3.


I have used it for pure as3 and flex projects.

As far as using it for small projects, it can be worthwhile because 
of the convenience methods that it provides. It's also pretty easy 
to add robotlegs to a project you have already started.



On Thursday, May 10, 2012, John McCormack wrote:

Hi there.

I am about to start some small AS3 projects.

I do like the idea of the structure that robotlegs offers and am
considering whether to invest the time to get into it.

Please let me know if...

a) you use robotlegs and like it.
b) you consider it worthwhile for small projects.

Thanks

John













[flexcoders] robotlegs

2012-05-10 Thread John McCormack
Hi there.

I am about to start some small AS3 projects.

I do like the idea of the structure that robotlegs offers and am 
considering whether to invest the time to get into it.

Please let me know if...

a) you use robotlegs and like it.
b) you consider it worthwhile for small projects.

Thanks

John



Re: [flexcoders] RobotLegs Framework

2010-04-30 Thread Mark Lapasa
I can testify, robotlegs is pretty good coming from 2yrs+ of doing
Cairngorm. A lot less boiler plate code that's for sure. Dependency
Injection for mock objects makes it great for the devs on my team to develop
views when the service layer is not quite ready yet. Give the best practices
a good read through and it should be a happy experience.

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Patricia Han flex...@yahoo.com wrote:



 Thanks a lot, John!
 Currently we're using Cairngorm, but we are thinking to move to Robotlegs
 in the next product. My concern on the Robotlegs is that not many people are
 using the new framework. So there won't be too many examples, talks,
 workarounds, etc.

 Thanks again.

 Pat.

 --
 *From:* John McCormack j...@easypeasy.co.uk
 *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Thu, April 29, 2010 1:37:37 AM
 *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] RobotLegs Framework



 Have a look at John Lindquist's video - 3rd one down:
 http://pv3d. org/ http://pv3d.org/
 John

 Patricia Han wrote:
 
 
  Hi Everyone,
 
  Have you used Robotlegs framework? Please share your experience with
  me. (compare with Cairngorm or PureMVC)
  Thanks,
 
  Pat
 
 
 
 


  



Re: [flexcoders] RobotLegs Framework

2010-04-29 Thread John McCormack
Have a look at John Lindquist's video - 3rd one down:
http://pv3d.org/
John

Patricia Han wrote:


 Hi Everyone,

 Have you used Robotlegs framework? Please share your experience with 
 me. (compare with Cairngorm or PureMVC)
 Thanks,

 Pat



 




Re: [flexcoders] RobotLegs Framework

2010-04-29 Thread Patricia Han
Thanks a lot, John!
Currently we're using Cairngorm, but we are thinking to move to Robotlegs in 
the next product. My concern on the Robotlegs is that not many people are using 
the new framework. So there won't be too many examples, talks, workarounds, etc.

Thanks again.

Pat.





From: John McCormack j...@easypeasy.co.uk
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, April 29, 2010 1:37:37 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] RobotLegs Framework

   
Have a look at John Lindquist's video - 3rd one down:
http://pv3d. org/
John

Patricia Han wrote:


 Hi Everyone,

 Have you used Robotlegs framework? Please share your experience with 
 me. (compare with Cairngorm or PureMVC)
 Thanks,

 Pat



 


 


  

[flexcoders] RobotLegs Framework

2010-04-28 Thread Patricia Han
Hi Everyone,

Have you used Robotlegs framework? Please share your experience with me. 
(compare with Cairngorm or PureMVC)
Thanks,

Pat