Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread JesterXL





Thanks Jim
 
- Original Message - 
From: Jim 
Schneider 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:00 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures


Here’s one that I’ve 
used for prototyping:
 
    

    
http://www.webservicex.net/WeatherForecast.asmx?WSDL
    

    
http://www.webservicex.net/WeatherForecast.asmx
    

    
true
    

 




From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:56 
AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures
 

um... ok so do you like know of any 
public WSDL's then?

 

- Original Message - 


From: Mink, 
Joseph 

To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 


Sent: Tuesday, 
October 11, 2005 12:12 PM

Subject: RE: 
[flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures

 
Gotcha...very 
cool!  Unfortunately, I can't share our wsdls with you as they aren't 
mine to share...but I'll keep you in mind.  A short supply of wsdls has 
never been a problem here!
 



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
Of JesterXLSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:57 AMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures
I've done it in Flash, and ported similiar 
remoting classes for Flex since they are already in there (what a lot of HTTPService, 
RemoteObject, WebService are built 
off of).  Figured if you hit me with a WSDL you know 
works, public or not, I could test 
it and post some example code.My problem has been finding WSDL's that work.  
xMethods.com for example has a ton 
that don't and it's a waste of time; rather go to someone who has one 
that knows it works.  The rest 
like Amazon and PayPal have ones that work, but take 10 years to sign up, register, blah blah 
blah- Original Message 
- From: "Mink, Joseph" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:50 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly 
classful architecturesIndeed I do...never leave home without it : )  Why do 
you ask, and whereare you going 
with this?  My understanding comes from Matt 
Chotin'sreply to my previous post 
entitled, "Calling a WebService solely throughAS."  His respose:--Not supported in Flex 1.5, supported in an upcoming 
version.Matt-I was told by others that there was a way to do it, but the 
fact that itwasn't supported or 
intended, I opted not to pursue it (it did not seemall that simple).From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:46 
AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesGot a WSDL?- Original Message - From: Mink, Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly 
classful architecturesYou mean 
after the mxml has been compiled?  It's been a month or 
sosince I attacked that particular 
problem, but as I remember it, therewas no straight-forward (intended) way to dynamically 
instantiateWebService 
objects.From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 
AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesThey don't have to be.  Have you looked into the 
webservice classes?- 
Original Message - From: Mink, 
Joseph To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly 
classful architecturesI'm not 
totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are asking how 
wellFlex supports object oriented 
programming.  If that is your question, myanswer would be that it supports it quite 
well.I'm a C++ & Java 
programmer way before I'm a make-shift RIA developer.Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature compared to what I 
expected itto be, and I've been 
able to employ most of the design patterns andapproaches that I typically use in other, more complex 
languages.  Thereare a few 
hang-ups with the fact that, for example, WebService 
objectsneed to be declared 
statically, outside of ActionScript (which wasfrustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and 
workedaround.There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's 
worth!From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of Marc TeichtahlSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 
AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
[flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesDear All,We 
are currently evaluating the possibilities to use Flex in our 
keyinternal support 
systems.As part of the 
eval

RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread Mink, Joseph





No, I don't...all of our work is for the gov't and the 
wsdls are for internal components...none of which are public and none of which I 
have the permission to share.
 
If I become aware of any public ones, I will definitely 
share.


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXLSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:56 PMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures

um... ok so do you like know of any public WSDL's 
then?
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mink, 
Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

Gotcha...very cool!  Unfortunately, I can't share our 
wsdls with you as they aren't mine to share...but I'll keep you in 
mind.  A short supply of wsdls has never been a problem 
here!
 



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXLSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:57 AMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures
I've done it in Flash, and ported similiar remoting classes for 
Flex since they are already in there (what a lot of HTTPService, 
RemoteObject, WebService are built off of).  Figured if you hit me with 
a WSDL you know works, public or not, I could test it and post some example 
code.My problem has been finding WSDL's that work.  xMethods.com 
for example has a ton that don't and it's a waste of time; rather go to 
someone who has one that knows it works.  The rest like Amazon and 
PayPal have ones that work, but take 10 years to sign up, register, blah 
blah blah- Original Message - From: "Mink, Joseph" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:50 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesIndeed 
I do...never leave home without it : )  Why do you ask, and whereare 
you going with this?  My understanding comes from Matt Chotin'sreply to 
my previous post entitled, "Calling a WebService solely throughAS."  
His respose:--Not supported in Flex 1.5, supported 
in an upcoming version.Matt-I was told by 
others that there was a way to do it, but the fact that itwasn't supported 
or intended, I opted not to pursue it (it did not seemall that 
simple).From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:46 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesGot a WSDL?- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph To: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesYou mean 
after the mxml has been compiled?  It's been a month or sosince I 
attacked that particular problem, but as I remember it, therewas no 
straight-forward (intended) way to dynamically instantiateWebService 
objects.From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesThey don't have to be.  Have you looked into the 
webservice classes?- Original Message - From: Mink, Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesI'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are 
asking how wellFlex supports object oriented programming.  If that is 
your question, myanswer would be that it supports it quite well.I'm 
a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a make-shift RIA 
developer.Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature compared to what I 
expected itto be, and I've been able to employ most of the design patterns 
andapproaches that I typically use in other, more complex languages.  
Thereare a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, WebService 
objectsneed to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript (which 
wasfrustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and 
workedaround.There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's 
worth!From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
Marc TeichtahlSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesDear All,We are currently evaluating the 
possibilities to use Flex in our keyinternal support systems.As part 
of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a highlyclassful 
implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious forany feedback 
(pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a highpolymorphic 
envirnoment.Marc Teicht

RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread Jim Schneider










Here’s one that I’ve used for
prototyping:

 

    

   
http://www.webservicex.net/WeatherForecast.asmx?WSDL

    

   
http://www.webservicex.net/WeatherForecast.asmx

    

   
true

    

 









From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005
11:56 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly
classful architectures



 



um... ok so do you like know of any public WSDL's then?





 





- Original Message - 



From: Mink,
Joseph 





To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com






Sent: Tuesday, October
11, 2005 12:12 PM





Subject: RE: [flexcoders]
Highly classful architectures







 



Gotcha...very cool!  Unfortunately, I
can't share our wsdls with you as they aren't mine to share...but I'll
keep you in mind.  A short supply of wsdls has never been a problem here!

 







From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of JesterXL
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005
11:57 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly
classful architectures

I've done it in Flash, and
ported similiar remoting classes for Flex since 
they are already in there (what a lot of
HTTPService, RemoteObject, 
WebService are built off of).  Figured if you
hit me with a WSDL you know 
works, public or not, I could test it and post
some example code.

My problem has been finding WSDL's that work. 
xMethods.com for example has 
a ton that don't and it's a waste of time; rather
go to someone who has one 
that knows it works.  The rest like Amazon
and PayPal have ones that work, 
but take 10 years to sign up, register, blah blah
blah

- Original Message - 
From: "Mink, Joseph"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:50 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful
architectures


Indeed I do...never leave home without it :
)  Why do you ask, and where
are you going with this?  My understanding
comes from Matt Chotin's
reply to my previous post entitled, "Calling
a WebService solely through
AS."  His respose:

--
Not supported in Flex 1.5, supported in an
upcoming version.

Matt
-

I was told by others that there was a way to do
it, but the fact that it
wasn't supported or intended, I opted not to
pursue it (it did not seem
all that simple).



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:46 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful
architectures


Got a WSDL?

- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful
architectures

You mean after the mxml has been compiled? 
It's been a month or so
since I attacked that particular problem, but as I
remember it, there
was no straight-forward (intended) way to
dynamically instantiate
WebService objects.



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful
architectures


They don't have to be.  Have you looked into
the webservice classes?

- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful
architectures

I'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume
you are asking how well
Flex supports object oriented programming. 
If that is your question, my
answer would be that it supports it quite well.

I'm a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a
make-shift RIA developer.
Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature compared
to what I expected it
to be, and I've been able to employ most of the
design patterns and
approaches that I typically use in other, more
complex languages.  There
are a few hang-ups with the fact that, for
example, WebService objects
need to be declared statically, outside of
ActionScript (which was
frustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt
with and worked
around.

There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's worth!



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc Teichtahl
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Highly classful
architectures


Dear All,

We are currently evaluating the possibilities to
use Flex in our key
internal support systems.

As part of the evaluation we are looking
specifically at a highly
classful implementation and archictecture. I would
be very curious

Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread JesterXL





um... ok so do you like know of any public WSDL's 
then?
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mink, 
Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

Gotcha...very cool!  Unfortunately, I can't share our 
wsdls with you as they aren't mine to share...but I'll keep you in 
mind.  A short supply of wsdls has never been a problem 
here!
 



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXLSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:57 AMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures
I've done it in Flash, and ported similiar remoting classes for 
Flex since they are already in there (what a lot of HTTPService, 
RemoteObject, WebService are built off of).  Figured if you hit me with 
a WSDL you know works, public or not, I could test it and post some example 
code.My problem has been finding WSDL's that work.  xMethods.com 
for example has a ton that don't and it's a waste of time; rather go to 
someone who has one that knows it works.  The rest like Amazon and 
PayPal have ones that work, but take 10 years to sign up, register, blah 
blah blah- Original Message - From: "Mink, Joseph" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:50 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesIndeed 
I do...never leave home without it : )  Why do you ask, and whereare 
you going with this?  My understanding comes from Matt Chotin'sreply to 
my previous post entitled, "Calling a WebService solely throughAS."  
His respose:--Not supported in Flex 1.5, supported 
in an upcoming version.Matt-I was told by 
others that there was a way to do it, but the fact that itwasn't supported 
or intended, I opted not to pursue it (it did not seemall that 
simple).From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:46 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesGot a WSDL?- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph To: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesYou mean 
after the mxml has been compiled?  It's been a month or sosince I 
attacked that particular problem, but as I remember it, therewas no 
straight-forward (intended) way to dynamically instantiateWebService 
objects.From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesThey don't have to be.  Have you looked into the 
webservice classes?- Original Message - From: Mink, Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesI'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are 
asking how wellFlex supports object oriented programming.  If that is 
your question, myanswer would be that it supports it quite well.I'm 
a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a make-shift RIA 
developer.Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature compared to what I 
expected itto be, and I've been able to employ most of the design patterns 
andapproaches that I typically use in other, more complex languages.  
Thereare a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, WebService 
objectsneed to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript (which 
wasfrustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and 
workedaround.There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's 
worth!From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
Marc TeichtahlSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesDear All,We are currently evaluating the 
possibilities to use Flex in our keyinternal support systems.As part 
of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a highlyclassful 
implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious forany feedback 
(pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a highpolymorphic 
envirnoment.Marc TeichtahlXB 
Networks BVDirector, EngineeringPhone:  +31 (0)36 546 24 
73Mobile: +31 (0)65 582 47 89[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.xb.nl <http://www.xb.nl/>From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
AlfrEDSent: maandag 10 oktober 2005 4:08To: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Please HelpI 
am new with flexand I am having problem understanding howI 
cancommunicate with the database (msyql).  If there i

RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread Mink, Joseph





Gotcha...very cool!  Unfortunately, I can't share our 
wsdls with you as they aren't mine to share...but I'll keep you in 
mind.  A short supply of wsdls has never been a problem 
here!
 



From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:57 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures
I've done it in Flash, and ported similiar remoting classes for 
Flex since they are already in there (what a lot of HTTPService, 
RemoteObject, WebService are built off of).  Figured if you hit me with 
a WSDL you know works, public or not, I could test it and post some example 
code.My problem has been finding WSDL's that work.  xMethods.com 
for example has a ton that don't and it's a waste of time; rather go to 
someone who has one that knows it works.  The rest like Amazon and 
PayPal have ones that work, but take 10 years to sign up, register, blah 
blah blah- Original Message - From: "Mink, Joseph" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:50 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesIndeed 
I do...never leave home without it : )  Why do you ask, and whereare 
you going with this?  My understanding comes from Matt Chotin'sreply to 
my previous post entitled, "Calling a WebService solely throughAS."  
His respose:--Not supported in Flex 1.5, supported 
in an upcoming version.Matt-I was told by 
others that there was a way to do it, but the fact that itwasn't supported 
or intended, I opted not to pursue it (it did not seemall that 
simple).From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:46 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesGot a WSDL?- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph To: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 
AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architecturesYou mean 
after the mxml has been compiled?  It's been a month or sosince I 
attacked that particular problem, but as I remember it, therewas no 
straight-forward (intended) way to dynamically instantiateWebService 
objects.From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
JesterXLSent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesThey don't have to be.  Have you looked into the 
webservice classes?- Original Message - From: Mink, Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AMSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesI'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are 
asking how wellFlex supports object oriented programming.  If that is 
your question, myanswer would be that it supports it quite well.I'm 
a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a make-shift RIA 
developer.Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature compared to what I 
expected itto be, and I've been able to employ most of the design patterns 
andapproaches that I typically use in other, more complex languages.  
Thereare a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, WebService 
objectsneed to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript (which 
wasfrustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and 
workedaround.There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's 
worth!From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OnBehalf Of 
Marc TeichtahlSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architecturesDear All,We are currently evaluating the 
possibilities to use Flex in our keyinternal support systems.As part 
of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a highlyclassful 
implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious forany feedback 
(pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a highpolymorphic 
envirnoment.Marc TeichtahlXB 
Networks BVDirector, EngineeringPhone:  +31 (0)36 546 24 
73Mobile: +31 (0)65 582 47 89[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.xb.nl <http://www.xb.nl/>From: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
AlfrEDSent: maandag 10 oktober 2005 4:08To: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Please HelpI 
am new with flexand I am having problem understanding howI 
cancommunicate with the database (msyql).  If there is someone 
thatcouldhelp me understand how I can insert data to the database 
(mysql)usingcoldfusion and flexI would really appreciate it.  A 
samplecodewill be great!  Thank you in 
advanceAlfieOp dit 
e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van 

Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread JesterXL
I've done it in Flash, and ported similiar remoting classes for Flex since 
they are already in there (what a lot of HTTPService, RemoteObject, 
WebService are built off of).  Figured if you hit me with a WSDL you know 
works, public or not, I could test it and post some example code.

My problem has been finding WSDL's that work.  xMethods.com for example has 
a ton that don't and it's a waste of time; rather go to someone who has one 
that knows it works.  The rest like Amazon and PayPal have ones that work, 
but take 10 years to sign up, register, blah blah blah

- Original Message - 
From: "Mink, Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:50 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures


Indeed I do...never leave home without it : )  Why do you ask, and where
are you going with this?  My understanding comes from Matt Chotin's
reply to my previous post entitled, "Calling a WebService solely through
AS."  His respose:

--
Not supported in Flex 1.5, supported in an upcoming version.

Matt
-

I was told by others that there was a way to do it, but the fact that it
wasn't supported or intended, I opted not to pursue it (it did not seem
all that simple).



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:46 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures


Got a WSDL?

- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

You mean after the mxml has been compiled?  It's been a month or so
since I attacked that particular problem, but as I remember it, there
was no straight-forward (intended) way to dynamically instantiate
WebService objects.



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures


They don't have to be.  Have you looked into the webservice classes?

- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

I'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are asking how well
Flex supports object oriented programming.  If that is your question, my
answer would be that it supports it quite well.

I'm a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a make-shift RIA developer.
Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature compared to what I expected it
to be, and I've been able to employ most of the design patterns and
approaches that I typically use in other, more complex languages.  There
are a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, WebService objects
need to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript (which was
frustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and worked
around.

There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's worth!



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc Teichtahl
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures


Dear All,

We are currently evaluating the possibilities to use Flex in our key
internal support systems.

As part of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a highly
classful implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious for
any feedback (pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a high
polymorphic envirnoment.



Marc Teichtahl
XB Networks BV
Director, Engineering

Phone:  +31 (0)36 546 24 73
Mobile: +31 (0)65 582 47 89
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.xb.nl <http://www.xb.nl/>






From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AlfrED
Sent: maandag 10 oktober 2005 4:08
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Please Help


I am new with flexand I am having problem understanding how
I can
communicate with the database (msyql).  If there is someone that
could
help me understand how I can insert data to the database (mysql)
using
coldfusion and flexI would really appreciate it.  A sample
code
will be great!  Thank you in advance

Alfie









Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te
vinden is op http://www.xb.nl/disclaimer.html



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com




SPONSORED LINKS
Web site des

RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread Mink, Joseph
Indeed I do...never leave home without it : )  Why do you ask, and where
are you going with this?  My understanding comes from Matt Chotin's
reply to my previous post entitled, "Calling a WebService solely through
AS."  His respose:
 
--
Not supported in Flex 1.5, supported in an upcoming version.

Matt
-

I was told by others that there was a way to do it, but the fact that it
wasn't supported or intended, I opted not to pursue it (it did not seem
all that simple).



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:46 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures


Got a WSDL?
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

You mean after the mxml has been compiled?  It's been a month or so
since I attacked that particular problem, but as I remember it, there
was no straight-forward (intended) way to dynamically instantiate
WebService objects.



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures


They don't have to be.  Have you looked into the webservice classes?
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mink, Joseph <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

I'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are asking how well
Flex supports object oriented programming.  If that is your question, my
answer would be that it supports it quite well.
 
I'm a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a make-shift RIA developer.
Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature compared to what I expected it
to be, and I've been able to employ most of the design patterns and
approaches that I typically use in other, more complex languages.  There
are a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, WebService objects
need to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript (which was
frustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and worked
around.
 
There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's worth!



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc Teichtahl
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures


Dear All,
 
We are currently evaluating the possibilities to use Flex in our key
internal support systems. 
 
As part of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a highly
classful implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious for
any feedback (pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a high
polymorphic envirnoment.
 


Marc Teichtahl
XB Networks BV
Director, Engineering

Phone:  +31 (0)36 546 24 73
Mobile: +31 (0)65 582 47 89
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.xb.nl <http://www.xb.nl/>  

 




From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AlfrED
Sent: maandag 10 oktober 2005 4:08
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Please Help


I am new with flexand I am having problem understanding how
I can 
communicate with the database (msyql).  If there is someone that
could 
help me understand how I can insert data to the database (mysql)
using 
coldfusion and flexI would really appreciate it.  A sample
code 
will be great!  Thank you in advance

Alfie





 

 

Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te
vinden is op http://www.xb.nl/disclaimer.html



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 




SPONSORED LINKS 
Web site design development
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Web+site+design+development&w1=Web+
site+design+development&w2=Computer+software+development&w3=Software+des
ign+and+development&w4=Macromedia+flex&w5=Software+development+best+prac
tice&c=5&s=166&.sig=L-4QTvxB_quFDtMyhrQaHQ> Computer software
development
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Computer+software+development&w1=We
b+site+design+development&w2=Computer+software+development&w3=Software+d
esign+and+development&w4=Macromedia+flex&w5=Software+development+best+pr
ac

Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread JesterXL





Got a WSDL?
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mink, 
Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

You mean after the mxml has been compiled?  It's been 
a month or so since I attacked that particular problem, but as I remember it, 
there was no straight-forward (intended) way to dynamically instantiate 
WebService objects.


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXLSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures

They don't have to be.  Have you looked into 
the webservice classes?
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mink, 
Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

I'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are 
asking how well Flex supports object oriented programming.  If that is your 
question, my answer would be that it supports it quite well.
 
I'm a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a 
make-shift RIA developer.  Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature 
compared to what I expected it to be, and I've been able to employ most of the 
design patterns and approaches that I typically use in other, more complex 
languages.  There are a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, 
WebService objects need to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript 
(which was frustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and worked 
around.
 
There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's 
worth!


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc 
TeichtahlSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures

Dear All,
 
We are currently evaluating the possibilities to use Flex 
in our key internal support systems. 
 
As part of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a 
highly classful implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious for 
any feedback (pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a high 
polymorphic envirnoment.
 
Marc TeichtahlXB Networks 
BVDirector, EngineeringPhone:  +31 (0)36 546 24 73Mobile: 
+31 (0)65 582 47 89[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.xb.nl 
 

  
  
  From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AlfrEDSent: 
  maandag 10 oktober 2005 4:08To: 
  flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Please 
  Help
  I am new with flexand I am having problem understanding how 
  I can communicate with the database (msyql).  If there is someone 
  that could help me understand how I can insert data to the database 
  (mysql) using coldfusion and flexI would really appreciate it.  A 
  sample code will be great!  Thank you in 
  advanceAlfie
   
   
  Op 
  dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.xb.nl/disclaimer.html





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread Mink, Joseph





You mean after the mxml has been compiled?  It's been 
a month or so since I attacked that particular problem, but as I remember it, 
there was no straight-forward (intended) way to dynamically instantiate 
WebService objects.


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JesterXLSent: 
Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:20 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures

They don't have to be.  Have you looked into 
the webservice classes?
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mink, 
Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

I'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are 
asking how well Flex supports object oriented programming.  If that is your 
question, my answer would be that it supports it quite well.
 
I'm a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a 
make-shift RIA developer.  Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature 
compared to what I expected it to be, and I've been able to employ most of the 
design patterns and approaches that I typically use in other, more complex 
languages.  There are a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, 
WebService objects need to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript 
(which was frustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and worked 
around.
 
There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's 
worth!


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc 
TeichtahlSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures

Dear All,
 
We are currently evaluating the possibilities to use Flex 
in our key internal support systems. 
 
As part of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a 
highly classful implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious for 
any feedback (pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a high 
polymorphic envirnoment.
 
Marc TeichtahlXB Networks 
BVDirector, EngineeringPhone:  +31 (0)36 546 24 73Mobile: 
+31 (0)65 582 47 89[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.xb.nl 
 

  
  
  From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AlfrEDSent: 
  maandag 10 oktober 2005 4:08To: 
  flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Please 
  Help
  I am new with flexand I am having problem understanding how 
  I can communicate with the database (msyql).  If there is someone 
  that could help me understand how I can insert data to the database 
  (mysql) using coldfusion and flexI would really appreciate it.  A 
  sample code will be great!  Thank you in 
  advanceAlfie
   
   
  Op 
  dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.xb.nl/disclaimer.html





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread JesterXL





They don't have to be.  Have you looked into 
the webservice classes?
 
- Original Message - 
From: Mink, 
Joseph 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

I'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are 
asking how well Flex supports object oriented programming.  If that is your 
question, my answer would be that it supports it quite well.
 
I'm a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a 
make-shift RIA developer.  Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature 
compared to what I expected it to be, and I've been able to employ most of the 
design patterns and approaches that I typically use in other, more complex 
languages.  There are a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, 
WebService objects need to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript 
(which was frustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and worked 
around.
 
There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's 
worth!


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc 
TeichtahlSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures

Dear All,
 
We are currently evaluating the possibilities to use Flex 
in our key internal support systems. 
 
As part of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a 
highly classful implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious for 
any feedback (pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a high 
polymorphic envirnoment.
 
Marc TeichtahlXB Networks 
BVDirector, EngineeringPhone:  +31 (0)36 546 24 73Mobile: 
+31 (0)65 582 47 89[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.xb.nl 
 

  
  
  From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AlfrEDSent: 
  maandag 10 oktober 2005 4:08To: 
  flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Please 
  Help
  I am new with flexand I am having problem understanding how 
  I can communicate with the database (msyql).  If there is someone 
  that could help me understand how I can insert data to the database 
  (mysql) using coldfusion and flexI would really appreciate it.  A 
  sample code will be great!  Thank you in 
  advanceAlfie
   
   
  Op 
  dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.xb.nl/disclaimer.html





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









RE: [flexcoders] Highly classful architectures

2005-10-11 Thread Mink, Joseph





I'm not totally sure what you mean, but I assume you are 
asking how well Flex supports object oriented programming.  If that is your 
question, my answer would be that it supports it quite well.
 
I'm a C++ & Java programmer way before I'm a 
make-shift RIA developer.  Flex/Flash's ActionScript is very mature 
compared to what I expected it to be, and I've been able to employ most of the 
design patterns and approaches that I typically use in other, more complex 
languages.  There are a few hang-ups with the fact that, for example, 
WebService objects need to be declared statically, outside of ActionScript 
(which was frustrating), but it's nothing that can't be dealt with and worked 
around.
 
There's a quick opinion, for whatever it's 
worth!


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc 
TeichtahlSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:57 AMTo: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Highly classful 
architectures

Dear All,
 
We are currently evaluating the possibilities to use Flex 
in our key internal support systems. 
 
As part of the evaluation we are looking specifically at a 
highly classful implementation and archictecture. I would be very curious for 
any feedback (pros/cons) etc in relation to using Flex in such a high 
polymorphic envirnoment.
 
Marc TeichtahlXB Networks 
BVDirector, EngineeringPhone:  +31 (0)36 546 24 73Mobile: 
+31 (0)65 582 47 89[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.xb.nl 
 

  
  
  From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AlfrEDSent: 
  maandag 10 oktober 2005 4:08To: 
  flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Please 
  Help
  I am new with flexand I am having problem understanding how 
  I can communicate with the database (msyql).  If there is someone 
  that could help me understand how I can insert data to the database 
  (mysql) using coldfusion and flexI would really appreciate it.  A 
  sample code will be great!  Thank you in 
  advanceAlfie
   
   
  Op 
  dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.xb.nl/disclaimer.html





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.