RE: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order

2009-01-11 Thread Maciek Sakrejda
Thanks, Amy. The nature of how we use charts would make a solution based around 
modifying the axis a lot simpler, but I may need to fall back to this approach. 
I think the problem is that an axis is unaware of its orientation, and 
left-to-right is isomorphic with bottom-to-top (to represent a cartesian chart 
with the standard x and y dimensions). This makes sense for numeric and 
datetime axes, but it seems counter-intuitive for a category axis. I wonder if 
I can monkey around with AxisBase.describeData()...


-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Amy
Sent: Sun 1/11/2009 5:52 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order
 
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Maciek Sakrejda msakre...@... 
wrote:

 When I have a data provider like
 
 [ { category : foo, val : 1 }, { category : bar, val : 2 },{ 
category :
 baz, val : 3 } ]
 
 and graph this on a BarChart as category vs. val, the values are 
graphed
 bottom to top. That is, category foo is on the bottom, then bar, then
 baz at the top. Is there a way to reverse this order, and have the
 categories as foo, bar, baz bottom-to-top without having to re-sort 
the
 dataprovider (it is used elsewhere) or copy the data in reverse order
 (I'd rather extend the charting components to do the right thing)?

How bout just creating a ListCollectionView that points to the same 
data and sort that?


winmail.dat

RE: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order

2009-01-11 Thread Maciek Sakrejda
Hmm. No dice. Overriding describeData() to return 
super.describeData().reverse() does nothing... Maybe I'll go the 
ListCollectionView route.

-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Maciek Sakrejda
Sent: Sun 1/11/2009 2:47 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order
 
Thanks, Amy. The nature of how we use charts would make a solution based around 
modifying the axis a lot simpler, but I may need to fall back to this approach. 
I think the problem is that an axis is unaware of its orientation, and 
left-to-right is isomorphic with bottom-to-top (to represent a cartesian chart 
with the standard x and y dimensions). This makes sense for numeric and 
datetime axes, but it seems counter-intuitive for a category axis. I wonder if 
I can monkey around with AxisBase.describeData()...


-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Amy
Sent: Sun 1/11/2009 5:52 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order
 
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Maciek Sakrejda msakre...@... 
wrote:

 When I have a data provider like
 
 [ { category : foo, val : 1 }, { category : bar, val : 2 },{ 
category :
 baz, val : 3 } ]
 
 and graph this on a BarChart as category vs. val, the values are 
graphed
 bottom to top. That is, category foo is on the bottom, then bar, then
 baz at the top. Is there a way to reverse this order, and have the
 categories as foo, bar, baz bottom-to-top without having to re-sort 
the
 dataprovider (it is used elsewhere) or copy the data in reverse order
 (I'd rather extend the charting components to do the right thing)?

How bout just creating a ListCollectionView that points to the same 
data and sort that?



winmail.dat

RE: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order

2009-01-11 Thread Maciek Sakrejda
Ok, so it looks like a (reasonably simple) way to do this is to set the 
dataProvider of the CategoryAxis to originalDataProvider.toArray().reverse() on 
every update of originalDataProvider. A ListCollectionView to wrap 
originalDataProvider would have been cleaner, but there doesn't seem to be a 
simple way to say sort the opposite of how this is sorted by default. I tried 
to extend ListCollectionView into a ReverseListCollectionView by overriding 
getItemAt() and itemIndex(), but it looks like CategoryAxis actually uses 
IViewCursor, and I would have had to write my own. I think this solution works 
reasonably well for now.


-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Maciek Sakrejda
Sent: Sun 1/11/2009 3:39 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order
 
Hmm. No dice. Overriding describeData() to return 
super.describeData().reverse() does nothing... Maybe I'll go the 
ListCollectionView route.

-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Maciek Sakrejda
Sent: Sun 1/11/2009 2:47 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order
 
Thanks, Amy. The nature of how we use charts would make a solution based around 
modifying the axis a lot simpler, but I may need to fall back to this approach. 
I think the problem is that an axis is unaware of its orientation, and 
left-to-right is isomorphic with bottom-to-top (to represent a cartesian chart 
with the standard x and y dimensions). This makes sense for numeric and 
datetime axes, but it seems counter-intuitive for a category axis. I wonder if 
I can monkey around with AxisBase.describeData()...


-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Amy
Sent: Sun 1/11/2009 5:52 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: CategoryAxis category order
 
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Maciek Sakrejda msakre...@... 
wrote:

 When I have a data provider like
 
 [ { category : foo, val : 1 }, { category : bar, val : 2 },{ 
category :
 baz, val : 3 } ]
 
 and graph this on a BarChart as category vs. val, the values are 
graphed
 bottom to top. That is, category foo is on the bottom, then bar, then
 baz at the top. Is there a way to reverse this order, and have the
 categories as foo, bar, baz bottom-to-top without having to re-sort 
the
 dataprovider (it is used elsewhere) or copy the data in reverse order
 (I'd rather extend the charting components to do the right thing)?

How bout just creating a ListCollectionView that points to the same 
data and sort that?




winmail.dat