Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
On Friday 14 Aug 2009, Matt Chotin wrote: > You can assume that we have this as an issue on our private contract-based > forums with them. I know I've talked to them about it. Good to hear Matt. Feel free to make a song and dance about it when it's all sorted out. > the replies to work in most email clients by getting rid of the stupid > [xxx] suffix on each. What was with that anyway ? I can't think of a single reason to do it. -- Helping to dramatically revolutionize fourth-generation scalable intuitive niches as part of the IT team of the year, '09 and '08 This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office together with a list of those non members who are referred to as partners. We use the word ?partner? to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Matt Chotin wrote: > You can assume that we have this as an issue on our private contract-based > forums with them. I could assume that, but why should I? I have previously assumed that issues I reported to Adobe were escalated to Jive, based on feedback from Adobe on my reports. Until I checked with Jive and they said they never got it: http://www.jivesoftware.com/jivespace/message/234157#234157 So instead of assuming why not just tell us what the issue number on your private forum is? Then I'll get the public case tagged with that one too. > WE at least got the > replies to work in most email clients by getting rid of the stupid [xxx] > suffix on each. If you consider the current situation to "work" I guess I just have higher standards. If everybody in this thread had sent his messages by email to the Adobe forums email 'feature' instead of Yahoo, 5 messages would be missing part or all of their content. If you had sent your message to the forums we would not be reading it the way you sent it, because the Jive software would have converted your [xxx] to something else. Jochem -- Jochem van Dieten http://jochem.vandieten.net/
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
You can assume that we have this as an issue on our private contract-based forums with them. I know I've talked to them about it. WE at least got the replies to work in most email clients by getting rid of the stupid [xxx] suffix on each. On 8/14/09 8:43 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: On Friday 14 Aug 2009, Jochem van Dieten wrote: > > the lack of correct headers to allow threading. > Will be fixed when hell freezes over: > http://www.jivesoftware.com/jivespace/thread/50602 The hell ... !?!
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
On Friday 14 Aug 2009, Jochem van Dieten wrote: > > the lack of correct headers to allow threading. > Will be fixed when hell freezes over: > http://www.jivesoftware.com/jivespace/thread/50602 The hell ... !?! -- Helping to continually optimize bricks-and-clicks transparent mindshares as part of the IT team of the year, '09 and '08 This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office together with a list of those non members who are referred to as partners. We use the word ?partner? to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote: > On Thursday 13 Aug 2009, Gregor Kiddie wrote: >> It does have to be said, I use the Mailing list functionality of the >> Adobe forums rather than visiting the forum directly... > > Last time I checked, this was utterly broken. With mangled bodies The fix is due on August 24th: http://www.jivesoftware.com/jivespace/thread/46593 Could use some pushing at Adobe to convince them to update their outdated 2.5.7 to 2.5.16. > mangled subject lines Fixed. > the lack of correct headers to allow threading. Will be fixed when hell freezes over: http://www.jivesoftware.com/jivespace/thread/50602 Jochem -- Jochem van Dieten http://jochem.vandieten.net/
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
can anyone help me in problem. when iam running my flex application which is connected to apache tomcat server tomcat stops after 3-4 records are inserted or deleted or any modification is done. I am connecting to tomcat thru struts application. Please any one help me. S.Purnima
RE: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
It kind of works... It only mangles some code samples, I've never had problems with the subject lines (though I know others have), and I get threading via outlook some of the time (though outlook has the same problem with this mailing list). It's usable enough for me to prefer it over actually visiting the forums. Gregor Kiddie Senior Developer INPS Tel: 01382 564343 Registered address: The Bread Factory, 1a Broughton Street, London SW8 3QJ Registered Number: 1788577 Registered in the UK Visit our Internet Web site at www.inps.co.uk http://www.inps.co.uk/> The information in this internet email is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it by anyone else is not authorised. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of INPS or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient please contact is.helpd...@inps.co.uk From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Chiverton Sent: 13 August 2009 16:39 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum. On Thursday 13 Aug 2009, Gregor Kiddie wrote: > It does have to be said, I use the Mailing list functionality of the > Adobe forums rather than visiting the forum directly... Last time I checked, this was utterly broken. With mangled bodies, mangled subject lines and the lack of correct headers to allow threading.
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
I don't think I'm going to bother joining the forums then. On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote: > > > On Thursday 13 Aug 2009, Gregor Kiddie wrote: > > It does have to be said, I use the Mailing list functionality of the > > Adobe forums rather than visiting the forum directly... > > Last time I checked, this was utterly broken. With mangled bodies, mangled > subject lines and the lack of correct headers to allow threading. > > -- > Helping to paradigmatically scale impactful mission-critical seamless > clusters > as part of the IT team of the year, '09 and '08 > > > > This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. > > Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and > Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at > Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB. A list > of members is available for inspection at the registered office together > with a list of those non members who are referred to as partners. We use the > word ?partner? to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant > with equivalent standing and qualifications. Regulated by the Solicitors > Regulation Authority. > > CONFIDENTIALITY > > This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and > may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you > must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it > nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its > existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please > delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500. > > For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.Halliwells.com. > > > >
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
On Thursday 13 Aug 2009, Gregor Kiddie wrote: > It does have to be said, I use the Mailing list functionality of the > Adobe forums rather than visiting the forum directly... Last time I checked, this was utterly broken. With mangled bodies, mangled subject lines and the lack of correct headers to allow threading. -- Helping to paradigmatically scale impactful mission-critical seamless clusters as part of the IT team of the year, '09 and '08 This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office together with a list of those non members who are referred to as partners. We use the word ?partner? to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
Ian Thomas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Andriy Panas wrote: > > >> Forums in general are way superior to mailing lists to exchange the >> knowledge on the Internet. >> > > My main issue with that is: > Mailing lists are push. Forums are pull. > > I'm on 6 or 7 different mailing lists. There's no way I'd get round to > visiting 6 or 7 different forums to see what's updated several times a > day; therefore I wouldn't ever read anything or answer anyone. > > Ian > > +1
RE: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
It does have to be said, I use the Mailing list functionality of the Adobe forums rather than visiting the forum directly... Gregor Kiddie Senior Developer INPS Tel: 01382 564343 Registered address: The Bread Factory, 1a Broughton Street, London SW8 3QJ Registered Number: 1788577 Registered in the UK Visit our Internet Web site at www.inps.co.uk http://www.inps.co.uk/> The information in this internet email is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it by anyone else is not authorised. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of INPS or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient please contact is.helpd...@inps.co.uk From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ian Thomas Sent: 13 August 2009 14:02 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum. On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Andriy Panasmailto:a.panas%40gmail.com> > wrote: > Forums in general are way superior to mailing lists to exchange the > knowledge on the Internet. My main issue with that is: Mailing lists are push. Forums are pull. I'm on 6 or 7 different mailing lists. There's no way I'd get round to visiting 6 or 7 different forums to see what's updated several times a day; therefore I wouldn't ever read anything or answer anyone. Ian
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Andriy Panas wrote: > Forums in general are way superior to mailing lists to exchange the > knowledge on the Internet. My main issue with that is: Mailing lists are push. Forums are pull. I'm on 6 or 7 different mailing lists. There's no way I'd get round to visiting 6 or 7 different forums to see what's updated several times a day; therefore I wouldn't ever read anything or answer anyone. Ian
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
On Thursday 13 Aug 2009, Andriy Panas wrote: >Adobe Forums are definitely the future for the main communication > medium for Adobe Flex experts. I have to disagree. >Things that jump into my mind first - Adobe Forums have better text > and code formatting support, Not needed. > pretty good search functionality, Google searches both, so any built-in system is pointless. > Adobe > forums are hosted and supported by vendor technology (Adobe), thus you > are more likely to receive the response from Adobe's engineers over > there. You know the forum software isn't Adobes, right ? And do you look at who posts here with @adobe address ? > Last, but not the least - most active member of Adobe Forums > are promoted with points score, So what ? > pretty good stuff for your individual > ego. If you are in it for your ego, I have bad news for you :-) > Of course, Adobe Forums still have a room to improve, Because they suck ? There's no point me reposting the complaints I've posted on it since it's relaunch, I'm sure you'll be able to locate them easily with the forums search engine... -- Helping to ambassadorially network channels as part of the IT team of the year, '09 and '08 This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office together with a list of those non members who are referred to as partners. We use the word ?partner? to refer to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. CONFIDENTIALITY This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 2500. For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.
Re: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
Hi all, Adobe Forums are definitely the future for the main communication medium for Adobe Flex experts. Forums in general are way superior to mailing lists to exchange the knowledge on the Internet. Things that jump into my mind first - Adobe Forums have better text and code formatting support, pretty good search functionality, Adobe forums are hosted and supported by vendor technology (Adobe), thus you are more likely to receive the response from Adobe's engineers over there. Last, but not the least - most active member of Adobe Forums are promoted with points score, pretty good stuff for your individual ego. Of course, Adobe Forums still have a room to improve, because StackOverFlow web-site is even better :P http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/flex -- Best regards, Andriy Panas
RE: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum.
I use both, mainly answering questions rather than asking them. It's obvious that the majority of the new members of the community have migrated to the forums rather than this list, which generates a lot of noise, which lowers its usefulness to anyone who "surfs" for useful posts. The mailing list still has the best posters on it (though we appear to have lost Alex to the forums :-(), has less noise and generally has more informed questions and answers. Definitely prefer Flexcoders... Gk. Gregor Kiddie Senior Developer INPS Tel: 01382 564343 Registered address: The Bread Factory, 1a Broughton Street, London SW8 3QJ Registered Number: 1788577 Registered in the UK Visit our Internet Web site at www.inps.co.uk http://www.inps.co.uk/> The information in this internet email is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access, copying or re-use of information in it by anyone else is not authorised. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of INPS or any of its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient please contact is.helpd...@inps.co.uk From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcod...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Wesley Acheson Sent: 12 August 2009 16:09 To: flexcoders Subject: [flexcoders] This mailing list vs the forum. I saw a mail a while ago about new Adobe forums. Those of you who use both which do you perfer flexcoders or the Adobe forums? I've an impression that the community is pretty strong here. ] Please only answer If you use both. Its not a real opinion to get the opinion of someone who only uses the group as they can't compare. Regards, Wes