Re: [Flexradio] FlexRadio Digest, Vol 30, Issue 21

2007-10-22 Thread Roland Etienne

-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rob Moore
Envoyé : dimanche 21 octobre 2007 23:58
À : flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Objet : Re: [Flexradio] FlexRadio Digest, Vol 30, Issue 21

Rob,

I have an SDR-100 as well which I use primarily for SWL'ing.  I've been 
aggravated by the DC Hump as well and like you am wondering what can 
be done about it.  I also have an SDR-IQ which isn't quite as sensitive 
as the SDR-1000 but works quite well and has no sign on the hump.  I 
know that the SDR-IQ doesn't use a sound card and instead has the I_Q 
demodulator and decimator on board so perhaps that's why it doesn't have 
any hump, but it seems like this is a design defect with t he SDR-1000 
that could be solved with a little effort.

Rob (coincidence!)

SDR-IQ and SDR-1000 are  completely different designs, the SDR-IQ have the
ADC on HF, there is no mixing process.

For information, SDR-1000 with janus-Ozy gives an unnoticeable hump...

73, Roland f8chk.

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



[Flexradio] Buffer / Sample Rate

2007-10-22 Thread Ken
I hear some people are using 192k sampling rate with 256k buffering.  
Are they doing this in safe mode 1 or in the normal mode?

I am running an Intel duel processor 2.4 with 4 gigs of memory with the 
two high speed 7200 rpm western digital hard drives in a Raid 0 
configuration using XP for the operator system.  The rig is the new 
Flex5000.

The Power SDR seems to run its best at 192K sampling rate but at 512K 
for the Buffer in the Normal mode.

I have tried the 256k buffering and it ends up crashing.  Any input on 
all of this would be a great help to aid towards my understanding!

Thank you.
Ken
K3YI

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



[Flexradio] Post Contest Report

2007-10-22 Thread FireBrick
I'm again the high JARTS scorer in zip code 60706
8040 were my concentrated effort, as that's where I have the poorest 
antennas.
Although I did work a alltime new rtty band/entity on 15 meters, C9

I concentrated on 'running' and did have a few problems.
One problem with HotWheels, you loose the use of the NumPad, as any 
character that also serves as directionals, changes PWSDR bands or modes.
So I have to remember (not easy) to use the keyboard numbers.
But I had good success with my dual vfo system.
Tuneing off frequency replies using vfoa and then clicking on the 'Restore' 
button for a fast return to proper listening frequency.

But I got a surprise when 15 and 20 opened in the early morning.
Either the Flex5Ka has the hottest receiver in the universe, or there was 
'one way prop' as I could hear the Euro/Asian station, loud, but they 
couldn't hear me.
That lasted till late, almost noon my time. Then they could hear me.

I did have a brain fart and caused myself a lot of rfi induced problems.
I got overheating messages, and a couple of lockups.
this was with 35 watts drive, pushing the Quadra to 500+/- watts output.

I finally remembered that I'd connected my 6 meter antenna to antenna port 
3, and due to high winds in Chicago, I'd nested my tower resulting in 
dipoles being in close proximity to the 6 meter Halo.
Apparently enough feedback was getting into the Flex5Ka. Disconnecting that 
coax solved the problem.

But I still made over 500 qsos, with only about 16 hours of on time.


I still worry about the temp reading but suspect that it's not that 
accurate, and that it's also rfi effected.
Because it will go yellow, but almost instantly upon transmission ending, it 
reverts to 40-48C range.


Maybe one of the readers can shed some light on a possible source of rf 
input that I can check out.

I did upload the new firmware, kept my fingers crossed, but had the 
instructions on one screen and followed step for step and it worked 
pefectly.
But I can't say as I saw any performance difference.

Each week I learn something new. Looking forward to next weekends contests.

-
Don't hate yourself in the morning, sleep until noon.
-

Bill H. in Chicagoland
webcams at http://76.16.160.118:8080/
weather at http://hhweather.webhop.org


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



[Flexradio] Receive Equalizer

2007-10-22 Thread Charles Greene
Hi,

I have been using the receive equalizer to reduce some of the high 
frequency audio noise on the SDR-1000 which is particularity annoying 
when using NR.  The audio noise is a problem only on voice modes such 
as SSB.  However, when I use digital modes, the audio bandwidth is 
greater than for voice, and the equalizer adversely affects the 
receive audio bandwidth in the digital programs.  I use a bandwidth 
of 5 KHz on the SDR-1000 for digital modes, and set MixW so one 
receive channel is receiving 0-5KHz and the other 100-3KHz audio, 
which shows any signal in the filter bandwidth but gives more 
resolution in the 0-3KHz range.  The equalizer when set to reduce the 
HF audio noise in SSB, reduces the gain on the display above about 
2.8KHz, plus it is broadly peaked around 2KHz.  Similarly, there is a 
problem on the sound card RTTY programs such as MMTTY.

Any one have the same problem?  I plan to submit an enhancement 
request to either have a mode specific receive equalizer, or disable 
the receive equalizer on the digital modes as the transmit equalizer 
is disabled.  I think having a separate setting of the equalizer both 
for receive and transmit for digital modes is a better choice than 
disabling it, as the peak around 2KHz can be easily corrected with 
the equalizer, giving a more flat response over the audio bandwidth 
for both receive and transmit.

Chas W1CG



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



Re: [Flexradio] Receive Equalizer

2007-10-22 Thread Tim Ellison
Chas,

I agree that the RX EQ setting should be saved, but save it along with
the TX EQ settings in the TX Profiles.  That way you can associate a TX
profile with a particular operating mode rather than being restricted to
just one RX EQ setting for a particular mode of operation.  I have
several TX profiles for digital modes and separate RX EQ settings would
be nice.

Sounds like a great enhancement.

-Tim

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Greene
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 10:49 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Receive Equalizer

Hi,

I have been using the receive equalizer to reduce some of the high
frequency audio noise on the SDR-1000 which is particularity annoying
when using NR.  The audio noise is a problem only on voice modes such as
SSB.  However, when I use digital modes, the audio bandwidth is greater
than for voice, and the equalizer adversely affects the receive audio
bandwidth in the digital programs.  I use a bandwidth of 5 KHz on the
SDR-1000 for digital modes, and set MixW so one receive channel is
receiving 0-5KHz and the other 100-3KHz audio, which shows any signal in
the filter bandwidth but gives more resolution in the 0-3KHz range.  The
equalizer when set to reduce the HF audio noise in SSB, reduces the gain
on the display above about 2.8KHz, plus it is broadly peaked around
2KHz.  Similarly, there is a problem on the sound card RTTY programs
such as MMTTY.

Any one have the same problem?  I plan to submit an enhancement request
to either have a mode specific receive equalizer, or disable the receive
equalizer on the digital modes as the transmit equalizer is disabled.  I
think having a separate setting of the equalizer both for receive and
transmit for digital modes is a better choice than disabling it, as the
peak around 2KHz can be easily corrected with the equalizer, giving a
more flat response over the audio bandwidth for both receive and
transmit.

Chas W1CG



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage:
http://www.flex-radio.com/


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



Re: [Flexradio] E-HAM SDR DISCUSSION A PERSONAL QSO THE OTHER NIGHT

2007-10-22 Thread John Bingel
 
As a FLEX-500 owner, I am not sure that a MINE IS BIGGER THAN YOURS
attitude will bring anybody over to SDR.  I don't think just to twist his
Brian housing group a little bit, I knew that this guy was going to have a
wise ass coment (sp) and  I thought that this old guy was going to blow a
gasket is the kind of advertisement that is going to win anybody over to
SDR.
 
Paul M. Segal W9EEA (1928) put it best in the Amateur Code of Conduct:  THE
AMATEUR IS FRIENDLY slow and patient operating when requested; friendly
advice and counsel to the beginner; kindly assistance, cooperation and
consideration for the interests of others. These are the hallmarks of the
amateur spirit. 
 
Good amateur radio practices and mentoring discussions about SDR, to those
intrested, will do more to educate the masses.  
More is learned by those reading the mail than open confrontation.
 
I have my 5000 and I love it.  But I don't understand how it matters that
soemone else doesn't want to know how they work or want one.
I also don't understand how buying (not designing), a new peice of hardware
makes someone smarter or better than the next guy!
 
Thankfully I ran into some mentoring hams in the late 1950's when I became
interested in ham radio  and some mentoring  SDR-1000 owners as I did my
reasearch on buying a Flex-Radio.
 
73
de John AD7DP
 
-
-
---
 
Oh what timing this article brings :)  http://www.eham.net/articles/17604
 
I was in QSO on 20M the other night with an older gentleman from Maine. He
was using his Pro 3 and I was using my Flex 5K. This genteman was and older
fellow and was the ornery, know it all type who seemed to enjoy out doing
and out talking the other person that he was taking to in the QSO. . The way
that he had talked to some of his other QSO's, I can see why most of them
cut the QSO short and moved on. I had been listening to him for about a half
hour or so before I decided to come back to his CQ just to twist his brian
housing group a little bit:). Anyways, after signal report, location. etc.,
I just had to tell me about my station as I knew that this guy was going to
have a wise ass coment about it. I told him that I was running a Flex
SDR-5000 which is a software defined radio connected to a HP qaud core
computer that was really the brains of the whole setup/station. I was
bragging about my band scope of 192K and the advantage of it over most
other radios that had band scopes and how my band scope provided more data
than just knowing that a certain frequency was occupied  (Like HIS Pro3 )
LOL.
 
Well, I thought that this old guy was going to blow a gasket or something.
He laid into me about my Flex 5K not being a REAL radio but just a
computer with a BOX attached to it and that he did not like talking to
people that were not using REAL radios. I gave him a brief introdction to
SDR's and explained that my Flex 5K would compete with just about anything
out there (including his Pro 3) which really set him off. LOL  After
laughing at him a bit, I thanked him for the QSO and then signed off. This
guy is/was a perfect example of a person that had no idea of what he was
talking about when it came to Flex, or SDR technology in general. The only
thing that he knew was that he was running one of ICOM's premiere HF radios
and that it had knobs and buttons (and a band scope) and that MY radio was
just some sort of stupid HF radio experiment that needs a computer to make
it work (and had no knobs or buttons). He also said that it would not last
very long either :) Sound familiar??
 
 
73 de
Paul Zora
K3PZ
Port Saint Lucie, FL
www.k3pz.com
 
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio
biz/attachments/20071012/a132bdbe/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
 
 
 
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.1/1078 - Release Date: 10/18/2007
5:47 PM
 
.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20071022/c5b0416d/attachment.html
 
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20071022/c5b0416d/attachment.jpe
 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex

Re: [Flexradio] Buffer / Sample Rate

2007-10-22 Thread john
Ken, 

Try increasing the Driver buffer size.

John P. Basilotto
W5GI
Chief Operating Officer
Marketing and Sales
Office  512 535-5266
FAX512 233-5143
www.flex-radio.com
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:03 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Buffer / Sample Rate

I hear some people are using 192k sampling rate with 256k buffering.  
Are they doing this in safe mode 1 or in the normal mode?

I am running an Intel duel processor 2.4 with 4 gigs of memory with the 
two high speed 7200 rpm western digital hard drives in a Raid 0 
configuration using XP for the operator system.  The rig is the new 
Flex5000.

The Power SDR seems to run its best at 192K sampling rate but at 512K 
for the Buffer in the Normal mode.

I have tried the 256k buffering and it ends up crashing.  Any input on 
all of this would be a great help to aid towards my understanding!

Thank you.
Ken
K3YI

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



Re: [Flexradio] Buffer / Sample Rate

2007-10-22 Thread Bill Winkis
I agree ... my best preformance is 512/192 .. but it runs fine at 256/192 
..now this is a Intel dual/6700 with 4 Gigs..and the only item on the 
machine is the 5000A.

John:
I upgraded SVN today and see that there are now Buffers for TX  RX 
..explain the merits...??

Also I sweep the the headphone and the Line Out (out to 7K) and they both 
are flat, with one of the best return audio's I have ever heard from a 
transceiver...(Even better then the Kenwood 870)
With out a print I am assuming the line out is mono and unbalanced...the 
headphone is Stereo. But what is the pick up on the headphone's right  left 
Channels..??

Bill
KC4PE

- Original Message - 
From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Buffer / Sample Rate


 Ken,

 Try increasing the Driver buffer size.

 John P. Basilotto
 W5GI
 Chief Operating Officer
 Marketing and Sales
 Office  512 535-5266
 FAX512 233-5143
 www.flex-radio.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken
 Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:03 AM
 To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 Subject: [Flexradio] Buffer / Sample Rate

 I hear some people are using 192k sampling rate with 256k buffering.
 Are they doing this in safe mode 1 or in the normal mode?

 I am running an Intel duel processor 2.4 with 4 gigs of memory with the
 two high speed 7200 rpm western digital hard drives in a Raid 0
 configuration using XP for the operator system.  The rig is the new
 Flex5000.

 The Power SDR seems to run its best at 192K sampling rate but at 512K
 for the Buffer in the Normal mode.

 I have tried the 256k buffering and it ends up crashing.  Any input on
 all of this would be a great help to aid towards my understanding!

 Thank you.
 Ken
 K3YI

 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
 FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
 FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

 


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



Re: [Flexradio] Receive Equalizer

2007-10-22 Thread Charles Greene
Tim,

How do you do that, ie, save EQ profiles?  Actually, the receive 
bandpass is perfectly flat using DIGU with the receive equalizer 
reset to zero.  It's just that on SSB, you need to use it, and it 
is active on DIGU receive.  Transmit is where you really need an 
equalizer.  I measured the power output from 500 Hz to 4 KHz, and the 
power varies, dropping off at the higher frequencies.  Power output 
was 20 watts (arbitrary) at 500 Hz and down to about 5 watts at 4KHz, 
or when the power output is 20 watts at 3KHz, it is 45 watts at 
500Hz.  The transmit equalizer has no effect using DIGU.  TX filter 
set at 400 to 4500 Hz, mode PSK31 on MixW, Drive 100, controlling 
output with TX gain.  With the SDR mode on USB and controlling the 
output with the Drive control, the level can easily be equalized to 
45 watts from 500 to 3500 Hz.  So where we need the TX equalizer, it 
is disabled and where we need the RX equalizer to be disabled, it is active.

73,  Chas

At 11:26 AM 10/22/2007, you wrote:
Chas,

I agree that the RX EQ setting should be saved, but save it along with
the TX EQ settings in the TX Profiles.  That way you can associate a TX
profile with a particular operating mode rather than being restricted to
just one RX EQ setting for a particular mode of operation.  I have
several TX profiles for digital modes and separate RX EQ settings would
be nice.

Sounds like a great enhancement.

-Tim

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Greene
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 10:49 AM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Receive Equalizer

Hi,

I have been using the receive equalizer to reduce some of the high
frequency audio noise on the SDR-1000 which is particularity annoying
when using NR.  The audio noise is a problem only on voice modes such as
SSB.  However, when I use digital modes, the audio bandwidth is greater
than for voice, and the equalizer adversely affects the receive audio
bandwidth in the digital programs.  I use a bandwidth of 5 KHz on the
SDR-1000 for digital modes, and set MixW so one receive channel is
receiving 0-5KHz and the other 100-3KHz audio, which shows any signal in
the filter bandwidth but gives more resolution in the 0-3KHz range.  The
equalizer when set to reduce the HF audio noise in SSB, reduces the gain
on the display above about 2.8KHz, plus it is broadly peaked around
2KHz.  Similarly, there is a problem on the sound card RTTY programs
such as MMTTY.

Any one have the same problem?  I plan to submit an enhancement request
to either have a mode specific receive equalizer, or disable the receive
equalizer on the digital modes as the transmit equalizer is disabled.  I
think having a separate setting of the equalizer both for receive and
transmit for digital modes is a better choice than disabling it, as the
peak around 2KHz can be easily corrected with the equalizer, giving a
more flat response over the audio bandwidth for both receive and
transmit.

Chas W1CG



___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage:
http://www.flex-radio.com/





___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



Re: [Flexradio] 11kHz DC noise

2007-10-22 Thread Mike Schwendeman
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20071022/ab0ec355/attachment.html
 
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/



Re: [Flexradio] FlexRadio Digest, Vol 30, Issue 21

2007-10-22 Thread Gerald Youngblood
Rob,
Let me confirm Roland's statement that the DC hump has nothing to do with
the SDR-1000 and everything to do with the sound card.  Better cards have
lower DC offset and/or noise.  The FLEX-5000 does not have this hump because
it uses a built in high performance A/D converter (i.e. no hump).  Janus/Ozy
offers the best performance for SDR-1000 use.
73,
Gerald

Gerald Youngblood, K5SDR
FlexRadio Systems
Ph: 512-535-4713
Fax: 512-233-5143
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.flex-radio.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Etienne
 Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 1:50 AM
 To: 'Rob Moore'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
 Subject: Re: [Flexradio] FlexRadio Digest, Vol 30, Issue 21
 
 
 -Message d'origine-
 De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Rob 
 Moore Envoyé : dimanche 21 octobre 2007 23:58 À : 
 flexradio@flex-radio.biz Objet : Re: [Flexradio] FlexRadio 
 Digest, Vol 30, Issue 21
 
 Rob,
 
 I have an SDR-100 as well which I use primarily for SWL'ing.  
 I've been aggravated by the DC Hump as well and like you am 
 wondering what can be done about it.  I also have an SDR-IQ 
 which isn't quite as sensitive as the SDR-1000 but works 
 quite well and has no sign on the hump.  I know that the 
 SDR-IQ doesn't use a sound card and instead has the I_Q 
 demodulator and decimator on board so perhaps that's why it 
 doesn't have any hump, but it seems like this is a design 
 defect with t he SDR-1000 that could be solved with a little effort.
 
 Rob (coincidence!)
 
 SDR-IQ and SDR-1000 are  completely different designs, the 
 SDR-IQ have the ADC on HF, there is no mixing process.
 
 For information, SDR-1000 with janus-Ozy gives an unnoticeable hump...
 
 73, Roland f8chk.
 
 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio 
 Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
 
 
 
 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
 FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio 
 Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
 
 


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/