Re: [Flexradio] Panadapter center frequency error in the SoftRock 40 mode in Beta 1.4.5 Preview 4

2005-11-08 Thread Bill Tracey

Hi Mike,

I noticed this with a V5 SoftRock which has a center freq of 7.040 -- the 
band edge glitch was pretty apparent.   Have traded some mail with Eric @ 
Flex about the glitch and expect a fix in the next drop.


Cecil - 1.4.5 pre 4 or so and beyond have support for the Soft Rock built in.

Cheers,

Bill  (kd5tfd)

At 06:36 PM 11/8/2005, Michael Blake wrote:
When selecting the "Soft Rock 40" radio model and then adjusting the 
Center Frequency option to reflect the exact crystal frequency (7.054200 
in my case) I find that the Panadapter display is not re-centered on this 
new frequency setting.  The center of the viewable range is still 7.056000 
and as you tune to the bottom of the 48kHz range you are off of the pan 
adapter noise display (to the left) and when you tune to the high end of 
the 48kHz. range you do not reach the high edge of the pan adapter.


Frequencies that are within the display range are accurately 
measured.  For example W1AW on 7.0475 is right on the nose after the 
correction has been entered.


Another way of saying this is that the Panadapter range is skewed by the 
amount of the difference from 7.056000 that is entered into the Center 
Frequency correction box.


I hope this is clear as I am having trouble putting this into words.

73 - Mike - K9JRI

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz






Re: [Flexradio] Panadapter center frequency error in the SoftRock 40 mode in Beta 1.4.5 Preview 4

2005-11-08 Thread KD5NWA
Does that beta version support the SR-40 or do you have a special 
overlay version?


At 06:36 PM 11/8/2005, you wrote:
When selecting the "Soft Rock 40" radio model and then adjusting the 
Center Frequency option to reflect the exact crystal frequency 
(7.054200 in my case) I find that the Panadapter display is not 
re-centered on this new frequency setting.  The center of the 
viewable range is still 7.056000 and as you tune to the bottom of 
the 48kHz range you are off of the pan adapter noise display (to the 
left) and when you tune to the high end of the 48kHz. range you do 
not reach the high edge of the pan adapter.


Frequencies that are within the display range are accurately 
measured.  For example W1AW on 7.0475 is right on the nose after the 
correction has been entered.


Another way of saying this is that the Panadapter range is skewed by 
the amount of the difference from 7.056000 that is entered into the 
Center Frequency correction box.


I hope this is clear as I am having trouble putting this into words.

73 - Mike - K9JRI

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz


Cecil Bayona
KD5NWA
www.qrpradio.com

I fail to see why doing the same thing over and over and getting the 
same results every time is insanity: I've almost proved it isn't; 
only a few more tests now and I'm sure results will differ this time ...  






[Flexradio] Panadapter center frequency error in the SoftRock 40 mode in Beta 1.4.5 Preview 4

2005-11-08 Thread Michael Blake

When selecting the "Soft Rock 40" radio model and then adjusting the Center Frequency option to reflect the exact crystal frequency (7.054200 in my case) I find that the Panadapter display is not re-centered on this new frequency setting.  The center of the viewable range is still 7.056000 and as you tune to the bottom of the 48kHz range you are off of the pan adapter noise display (to the left) and when you tune to the high end of the 48kHz. range you do not reach the high edge of the pan adapter.
 
Frequencies that are within the display range are accurately measured.  For example W1AW on 7.0475 is right on the nose after the correction has been entered.
 
Another way of saying this is that the Panadapter range is skewed by the amount of the difference from 7.056000 that is entered into the Center Frequency correction box.
 
I hope this is clear as I am having trouble putting this into words.
 
73 - Mike - K9JRI