Re: [Flightgear-devel] PLIB version for building from CVS

2005-10-20 Thread Mike Rawlins


--- Buchanan, Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi All,
 
 Which version of PLib is required to build the
 current
 FG CVS?

v1.8.4 is the latest stable release.  Unfortunately, I
can't add any other useful info regarding the compile
error.

Mike

 
 I'm getting a build error (output below), which I
 assume is due to an incorrect PLIB version. I'm
 using 
 v1.8.4
 
 Thanks
 
 -Stuart
 
 g++  -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT  -L/usr/local/lib -o
 js_demo.exe  js_demo.o -lplibjs  -
 lwinmm -lplibul

/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.3/../../../libplibjs.a(jsWindows.o):
 In func
 tion `_ZN10jsJoystick4openEv':
 /home/Stuart/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsWindows.cxx:107:
 undefined reference to `_joyGe
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]'

/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.3/../../../libplibjs.a(jsWindows.o):
 In func
 tion `_ZN10jsJoystick7rawReadEPiPf':
 /home/Stuart/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsWindows.cxx:191:
 undefined reference to `_joyGe
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 make[2]: *** [js_demo.exe] Error 1
 make[2]: Leaving directory
 `/home/Stuart/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Input'
 
 
   
   
   

___
 
 Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC
 calling worldwide with voicemail
 http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
 
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org

http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
 





__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] How does the weather work in FlightGear?

2005-10-12 Thread Mike Rawlins


--- Adam Dershowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Oct 10, 2005, at 10:26 AM, Ampere K. Hardraade
 wrote:
 
  On October 10, 2005 03:37 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
 
  Buchanan, Stuart wrote:

 
  In my opinion, it would be better if data from
 multiple nearby  
  METAR stations
  is used instead of fetching data from only one
 station.  I often  
  fly with
  real-weather-fetch enabled, and the plane gets a
 huge jolt whenever  
  the
  weather is updated.  The change in the visual
 aspects is also too  
  sudden.
  Using data from multiple METAR stations could
 avoid the above  
  problems and
  allow us to have a smooth transistion in weather.
 
  Ampere
 
 
 
 This is not as obvious as it would first seem.  Some
 weather  
 phenomena have very sharp transitions and some are
 gradual.  So I  
 don't think that interpolating weather is a
 trivial thing to do.
 For example a cold front is often a very well
 defined line with rain  
 right along the front.  In that case the weather
 right nearby is the  
 best indicator and a METAR from 5 miles away could
 give a completely  
 different story.  Airmass thunderstorms are another
 example where  
 very local weather is what matters.  To make maters
 worse the METAR  
 will just have temperature and wind, so you would
 have to look at a  
 few different locations and times to figure out that
 a front has  
 passed.  And the local geography (mountains, lake
 effects, shore  
 lines) can also be a significant issue.
 I am not saying that it could not be done, just that
 it would take  
 some real thought and real understanding of weather
 phenomena for it  
 to apply in the general case rather than just in a
 few specific case  
 and make things worse other times.
 
 --Adam
 

Maybe the best solution would be to make the
transition  of cloud height, air temperature, and wind
from one METAR to the next occur over some length of
time (minute or so), rather than abruptly. If this is
possible. 

Mike




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC problems with 0.9.8 tarball

2005-09-14 Thread Mike Rawlins

--- PJ Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip

 you can see from the 
 screenshot:
 
 http://www.cs.unc.edu/~quirk/blankscreen.bmp
 
 Though the hud/panel can be displayed, and any
 airplane flies fine 
 according to the instruments, there's just no
 scenery. 

snip

Patrick,

v0.9.8 comes with scenery for the 10x10 degree block
with corner 130W, 30N.  Did you start the sim at KSFO?
 If you started it in a region outside of central
California no scenery will show.

Mike




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear startup time

2005-05-25 Thread Mike Rawlins

40 seconds for CVS vesion on Dell (laptop) running
Linux Fedora Core 2, 1.6 GHz processor, 2 GB RAM.  I
can live with that.

Mike

--- Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It takes 23 seconds to start my build on an amd64
 3400, 1Gb ram.
 
 -Fred
 
 Drew a écrit :
 
 I'm compiling a Release build.  It takes me a bit
 under a minute to
 bring it up, which isn't as bad as the 5 minutes
 Vivian reported, but
 it's still longer than I'd like (and longer than I
 believe is
 necessary).  I'll see what I can do about disabling
 navaids...that
 seems like it be a lot of help.  I haven't found a
 property in
 preferences.xml or a command-line option for this,
 yet.
 
 Drew
 
 On 5/24/05, Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   
 
 Drew a écrit :
 
 
 
 FlightGear takes nearly a minute to start up from
 my Windows build,
 and I'm just wondering if there's an easy way to
 shorten this if I'm
 not using all of flightgear's features.  Is there
 one particular task
 that takes particularly long?
 
 
   
 
 Do you use the Debug or the Release build ?
 MSVC 7.x adds a lot of debug code in memory
 management (assertion check,
 corrupted heap) that makes the Debug build
 **very** slow.
 The Release build, as in the official win32
 releases, is way faster.
 Maybe 5x to 10x.
 
 -Fred
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org

http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
 



__ 
Yahoo! Mail 
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: 
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html 


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d