Re: [Flightgear-devel] MILOAB?
Martin Spott wrote: Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm...we have a flight model for that yet? We'd need a c-130 to roll it out of as well. Or would the j3 with the door open be good enough? :-) Hmmm, I think II remember a posting by Curt, meaning that FlightGear should remain free of armament. I'd love to see that this is still true. Actually Curtis wants this list free of politics. I agree with that, but I can hardly call this politics. It's merely a killing joke. I must admid I've hesitated if I should post it, but saw no harm in it since it has nothing to do with pro or contra anything (maybe except mothers in law). Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] MILOAB?
Erik, Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually Curtis wants this list free of politics. I agree with that, but I can hardly call this politics. It's merely a killing joke. Please excuse me for my mistakable posting. It was not my intention to attack anyone personally. Unfortunately even the most distant comment on military action inevitably touches politics these days and, as Curt already mentioned, people have different opinions on what's going on in our world today, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] MILOAB?
Martin Spott wrote: Please excuse me for my mistakable posting. It was not my intention to attack anyone personally. No problem. I can handle it (I won't even think about the number of jokes about the Dutch in the USA (and Germany?) ...) Unfortunately even the most distant comment on military action inevitably touches politics these days and, as Curt already mentioned, people have different opinions on what's going on in our world today, Which is a good thing. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] MILOAB?
You are realy mean you this time dropping these new type of miloab[*] bombs. Thess devices drop in uninvitedly at an unexpected and realy inconvinient time and hang around without a notice until the tension increses to an unbearable level. Erik [*] Mother in law, of all bombs. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] MILOAB?
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: You are realy mean you this time dropping these new type of miloab[*] bombs. Thess devices drop in uninvitedly at an unexpected and realy inconvinient time and hang around without a notice until the tension increses to an unbearable level. Erik [*] Mother in law, of all bombs. Hmmm...we have a flight model for that yet? We'd need a c-130 to roll it out of as well. Or would the j3 with the door open be good enough? :-) Best, Jim ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] MILOAB?
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm...we have a flight model for that yet? We'd need a c-130 to roll it out of as well. Or would the j3 with the door open be good enough? :-) Hmmm, I think II remember a posting by Curt, meaning that FlightGear should remain free of armament. I'd love to see that this is still true, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] MILOAB?
Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm...we have a flight model for that yet? We'd need a c-130 to roll it out of as well. Or would the j3 with the door open be good enough? :-) Hmmm, I think II remember a posting by Curt, meaning that FlightGear should remain free of armament. I'd love to see that this is still true, Sounds good to me. I was just playing off of Erik's joke. I am not interested in combat sims either. Best, Jim ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] MILOAB?
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Spott) [2003.03.23 17:53]: Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm...we have a flight model for that yet? We'd need a c-130 to roll it out of as well. Or would the j3 with the door open be good enough? :-) Hmmm, I think II remember a posting by Curt, meaning that FlightGear should remain free of armament. I'd love to see that this is still true, AFAIK, here[1] is our current position on this: No, we do not currently support combat. Most of our developers are primarily focused on civilian aviation. We aren't explicitly excluding these features -- we just haven't had anyone who seriously wanted to develop these areas. However, FlightGear does contain several military aircraft, albeit without munitions. [1] http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/FlightGear-FAQ.html#7.4 -- Cameron Moore [ Plan to be spontaneous tomorrow. ] ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
