[Flightgear-devel] RFD: default weather

2004-06-15 Thread Curtis L. Olson
We currently have the ability to sync with real METAR weather reports as 
we fly.

I would like to propose that we set the default weather to zero winds, 
zero turbulence, and maybe (?) zero clouds.

Those that want interesting weather by default can use the METAR 
fetching feature, and those that are trying out FG for the first time 
will have fewer surprises.  What do you think?

Curt.
--
Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt 
HumanFIRST Program  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project  http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: default weather

2004-06-15 Thread Lee Elliott
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 19:55, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
 We currently have the ability to sync with real METAR weather reports as
 we fly.

 I would like to propose that we set the default weather to zero winds,
 zero turbulence, and maybe (?) zero clouds.

 Those that want interesting weather by default can use the METAR
 fetching feature, and those that are trying out FG for the first time
 will have fewer surprises.  What do you think?

 Curt.

I mentioned once that I was seeing some strange jumps in the wind and 
visibility when I take off (from near 0ft alt airfields) and not using METAR 
weather - I wonder if some of the problems that some newbies experience might 
also be due to this.  For example, sometimes I'm getting 6kt winds at ground 
level, when they should be 3kt and then quite often they're up to 30kt by the 
time I'm up to around 800ft agl.

It doesn't seem to happen consistently but I'd guess it occurs about 50% of 
the time.  Re-applying the weather settings via the gui will eventually sort 
it out but frequently, after re-applying the settings by clicking the 'Apply' 
button, and then clicking 'OK', the weather reverts back to the incorrect 
settings.  Sometime clicking the 'Apply' button has no immediate effect and I 
have to click it many times before a change occurs and even then, it's not 
always to the correct settings.

Just to confirm, I've been checking the settings in /environment via the 
property browser and I can see there that the settings are incorrect.

If this were to occur to a newbie I can easily imagine them having trouble 
keeping the C-172 level as they transition from 6kt winds in one direction to 
30kt winds from a different direction, and when it does occur the transition 
is pretty sharp.

Apart from some modifications to the visibility ranges I'm using the current 
default weather settings.

I haven't tried zeroing all the settings yet, to see what effect that would 
have.

Re the clouds, I think it would be a good idea to keep the high-level cirrus - 
that's unlikely to cause any problems with a first time user and does break 
up the sky a bit.

LeeE

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: default weather

2004-06-15 Thread Josh Babcock
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
We currently have the ability to sync with real METAR weather reports as 
we fly.

I would like to propose that we set the default weather to zero winds, 
zero turbulence, and maybe (?) zero clouds.

Those that want interesting weather by default can use the METAR 
fetching feature, and those that are trying out FG for the first time 
will have fewer surprises.  What do you think?

Curt.
I like this idea.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


RE: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: default weather

2004-06-15 Thread Giles Robertson
I've never heard of Lee's problems, but I think it's a good idea to keep
the high-level clouds because they prove that we can do them, and they
make the sky look vaguely realistic (how often do you get clear skies in
San Fransisco? Simply off the geography, I'd guess not too frequently,
but I've never been within 5000 miles, so I don't know)

Giles Robertson


-Original Message-
From: Lee Elliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 15 June 2004 20:12
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: default weather

On Tuesday 15 June 2004 19:55, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
 We currently have the ability to sync with real METAR weather reports
as
 we fly.

 I would like to propose that we set the default weather to zero winds,
 zero turbulence, and maybe (?) zero clouds.

 Those that want interesting weather by default can use the METAR
 fetching feature, and those that are trying out FG for the first time
 will have fewer surprises.  What do you think?

 Curt.

I mentioned once that I was seeing some strange jumps in the wind and 
visibility when I take off (from near 0ft alt airfields) and not using
METAR 
weather - I wonder if some of the problems that some newbies experience
might 
also be due to this.  For example, sometimes I'm getting 6kt winds at
ground 
level, when they should be 3kt and then quite often they're up to 30kt
by the 
time I'm up to around 800ft agl.

It doesn't seem to happen consistently but I'd guess it occurs about 50%
of 
the time.  Re-applying the weather settings via the gui will eventually
sort 
it out but frequently, after re-applying the settings by clicking the
'Apply' 
button, and then clicking 'OK', the weather reverts back to the
incorrect 
settings.  Sometime clicking the 'Apply' button has no immediate effect
and I 
have to click it many times before a change occurs and even then, it's
not 
always to the correct settings.

Just to confirm, I've been checking the settings in /environment via the

property browser and I can see there that the settings are incorrect.

If this were to occur to a newbie I can easily imagine them having
trouble 
keeping the C-172 level as they transition from 6kt winds in one
direction to 
30kt winds from a different direction, and when it does occur the
transition 
is pretty sharp.

Apart from some modifications to the visibility ranges I'm using the
current 
default weather settings.

I haven't tried zeroing all the settings yet, to see what effect that
would 
have.

Re the clouds, I think it would be a good idea to keep the high-level
cirrus - 
that's unlikely to cause any problems with a first time user and does
break 
up the sky a bit.

LeeE

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: default weather

2004-06-15 Thread Jim Wilson
Curtis L. Olson said:

 We currently have the ability to sync with real METAR weather reports as 
 we fly.
 
 I would like to propose that we set the default weather to zero winds, 
 zero turbulence, and maybe (?) zero clouds.
 
 Those that want interesting weather by default can use the METAR 
 fetching feature, and those that are trying out FG for the first time 
 will have fewer surprises.  What do you think?
 

Sounds ok.  Then Denver won't be in the clouds all the time.  Maybe a pui
dialog option(s) that offered a non-metar weather scenario or two or three
would be good.

Best,

Jim


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFD: default weather

2004-06-15 Thread Chris Metzler
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:47:47 -
Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Curtis L. Olson said: 

 We currently have the ability to sync with real METAR weather reports
 as we fly.
 
 I would like to propose that we set the default weather to zero winds,
 
 zero turbulence, and maybe (?) zero clouds.
 
 Those that want interesting weather by default can use the METAR 
 fetching feature, and those that are trying out FG for the first time 
 will have fewer surprises.  What do you think?
 
 Sounds ok.  Then Denver won't be in the clouds all the time.  Maybe a
 pui dialog option(s) that offered a non-metar weather scenario or two or
 three would be good.

I ditto this.  In addition to no weather and METAR extracted, having
a scenario or two would be nice.  But I think having a default of nothing
(except for maybe some high-altitude stuff for scenery) is good.

-c


-- 
Chris Metzler   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove snip-me. to email)

As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized. - Chief Luther Standing Bear


pgpR0ASExz5yU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel