[Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Does anyone have any specific dimensions for the layout and size of a
VASI system?

>From what I've been able to find, the VASI/PAPI system should be 50'
off the side of the runway and about 950ft/285m from the threshold.  I
know that each of the 4 PAPI lights is spaced about 9m/30ft apart.

But, VASI seems to be the 'old' system and I'm not having any luck
finding any documentation on exactly where the VASI is placed and
exactly how the lights are laid out.

I believe that VASI is placed the same as PAPI, but I need to figure
out exactly what the VASI looks like.

Thanks,

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



[Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread David Culp

According to the U.S. Navy:

http://www.efdlant.navfac.navy.mil/Lantops_15/topics/Facilities/NAVAIR_51-50
AAA-2.PDF

see Section 003-11 for VASI,  Section 003-12 for PAPI

The first (downwind) VASI bar should be 600 feet from the runway threshhold,
and subsequent bars should be 700 feet upwind.  Most civil installations use
a three-bar system, with three lights in the first and second bars, and two
lights in the last one.  VASI bars are located on both sides of the runway,
so a three-bar system has 6 bars and 16 lights.

In each bar the light nearest the runway is 50 feet from the runway edge.
The other lights(s) are spaced 16 feet apart.

I deduce from the drawing that the first bar lights point at an angle of 2.5
degrees above the horizon, and the other two point at 3 degrees.

Dave Culp


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



[Flightgear-devel] VASI question

2003-12-01 Thread Hoyt A. Fleming
I was shooting an approach with FG and noticed that when I pitch up the
aircraft, the VASI lights turn white.  Similarly, when I pitch down the
aircraft, the VASI lights turn red.  I loaded the UFO and verified the VASI
lights change color when the UFO is stationary and the pitch of the UFO
varies.

Is this a known issue?

Hoyt Fleming



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread David Megginson

Curtis L. Olson writes:

 > Does anyone have any specific dimensions for the layout and size of a
 > VASI system?
 > 
 > >From what I've been able to find, the VASI/PAPI system should be 50'
 > off the side of the runway and about 950ft/285m from the threshold.  I
 > know that each of the 4 PAPI lights is spaced about 9m/30ft apart.

Here's another complication: there are different VASIS and PAPI
systems for different aircraft sizes.  Here's an excerpt from the
Canadian AIP:

  Approach slope indicator systems provide safe wheel clearance over
  the runway threshold.  The vertical distance from a pilot's eyes to
  the lowest portion of the aircraft in the landing attitude is called
  the EWH, and this distance varies from less than four feet to up to
  45 ft for some wide-bodied aircraft, such as the B-747.

  [snip]

  Visual Approach Slope Indicator System (VASIS)

V1: 2-BAR VASIS intended to serve aircraft with EWH up to three
metres (ten feet).

V2: 2-BAR VASIS intended to serve aircraft with an EWH up to 14 m (45
ft). 

V3: 3-BAR VASIS intended to serve wide-bodied aircraft with an EWH
up to 14 m (45 ft).

AV: AVASIS intended to serve aircraft with EWH up to three metres
(ten feet).

 
  PAPI (Precision Approach Path Indicator)

P1: PAPI for aircraft with EWH up to three metres (ten feet).

P2: PAPI for aircraft with an EWH up to 7.5 m (25 ft).

P3: PAPI for aircraft with an EWH up to 14 m (45 ft).

AP: APAPI for aircraft with an EWH up to three metres (ten feet).

I imagine that the main consideration is runway length -- if the
runway is 8,000ft, it doesn't hurt a C172 to come in 40 feet too high
over the threshold, and if the runway is 2,000ft, transport jets won't
be landing on it.

There are aerodrome standards online, and those probably include VASIS
and PAPI placement.  I could point you to the Canadian ones, but I'm
sure the FAA has the U.S. ones online as well.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Yes, there are definitely complications, but right now our data has
N=none, V=vasi, P=papi, so I'm planning to start simple.

What I'm looking for is somethingn to the effect that a VASI light bar
is a row of "n" lights spaced "x" meters apart.  VASI light bars are
spaced "y" meters apart along the length of the runway.

And if I'm really lucky I'd get the difference in degrees in alignment
between the two/three light bars.  I.e. bottom bar turns red at 3
degrees, top bar turns red at 3.25 degrees (or something like that.)

Regards,

Curt.


David Megginson writes:
> Curtis L. Olson writes:
> 
>  > Does anyone have any specific dimensions for the layout and size of a
>  > VASI system?
>  > 
>  > >From what I've been able to find, the VASI/PAPI system should be 50'
>  > off the side of the runway and about 950ft/285m from the threshold.  I
>  > know that each of the 4 PAPI lights is spaced about 9m/30ft apart.
> 
> Here's another complication: there are different VASIS and PAPI
> systems for different aircraft sizes.  Here's an excerpt from the
> Canadian AIP:
> 
>   Approach slope indicator systems provide safe wheel clearance over
>   the runway threshold.  The vertical distance from a pilot's eyes to
>   the lowest portion of the aircraft in the landing attitude is called
>   the EWH, and this distance varies from less than four feet to up to
>   45 ft for some wide-bodied aircraft, such as the B-747.
> 
>   [snip]
> 
>   Visual Approach Slope Indicator System (VASIS)
> 
> V1: 2-BAR VASIS intended to serve aircraft with EWH up to three
> metres (ten feet).
> 
> V2: 2-BAR VASIS intended to serve aircraft with an EWH up to 14 m (45
> ft). 
> 
> V3: 3-BAR VASIS intended to serve wide-bodied aircraft with an EWH
> up to 14 m (45 ft).
> 
> AV: AVASIS intended to serve aircraft with EWH up to three metres
> (ten feet).
> 
>  
>   PAPI (Precision Approach Path Indicator)
> 
> P1: PAPI for aircraft with EWH up to three metres (ten feet).
> 
> P2: PAPI for aircraft with an EWH up to 7.5 m (25 ft).
> 
> P3: PAPI for aircraft with an EWH up to 14 m (45 ft).
> 
> AP: APAPI for aircraft with an EWH up to three metres (ten feet).
> 
> I imagine that the main consideration is runway length -- if the
> runway is 8,000ft, it doesn't hurt a C172 to come in 40 feet too high
> over the threshold, and if the runway is 2,000ft, transport jets won't
> be landing on it.
> 
> There are aerodrome standards online, and those probably include VASIS
> and PAPI placement.  I could point you to the Canadian ones, but I'm
> sure the FAA has the U.S. ones online as well.
> 
> 
> All the best,
> 
> 
> David
> 
> -- 
> David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
> 
> ___
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Alex Perry

For the U.S., the numbers are documented in the AIM to give the angles etc
for both 2-bar and 3-bar VASI and normal PAPI systems.  Generalizing:

A 2 bar VASI is simply a 3 bar VASI with one of the bars missing
so I recommend doing 3 bar units consistently everywhere.

The PAPI unit has all the lights at the same location, only the angle
for the color change is different.  Therefore, aircraft that need a
greater threshold crossing height for the pilot viewpoint are forced
to use a steeper approach angle which is inconvenient for them.

In contrast, the VASI has small aircraft use the two nearer bars while
larger aircraft use the two further bars.  This provides both a steeper
angle for large aircraft as well as additional distance down the runway
which in combination provide the needed threshold crossing height.
As a result, the descent angle for wide bodies is less steep.

> Yes, there are definitely complications, but right now our data has
> N=none, V=vasi, P=papi, so I'm planning to start simple.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread David Megginson

Curtis L. Olson writes:

 > What I'm looking for is somethingn to the effect that a VASI light bar
 > is a row of "n" lights spaced "x" meters apart.  VASI light bars are
 > spaced "y" meters apart along the length of the runway.
 > 
 > And if I'm really lucky I'd get the difference in degrees in alignment
 > between the two/three light bars.  I.e. bottom bar turns red at 3
 > degrees, top bar turns red at 3.25 degrees (or something like that.)

These should all be governed by federal standards, and those standards
should be online somewhere.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Curtis L. Olson

David Megginson writes:
> Curtis L. Olson writes:
> 
>  > What I'm looking for is somethingn to the effect that a VASI light bar
>  > is a row of "n" lights spaced "x" meters apart.  VASI light bars are
>  > spaced "y" meters apart along the length of the runway.
>  > 
>  > And if I'm really lucky I'd get the difference in degrees in alignment
>  > between the two/three light bars.  I.e. bottom bar turns red at 3
>  > degrees, top bar turns red at 3.25 degrees (or something like that.)
> 
> These should all be governed by federal standards, and those standards
> should be online somewhere.

Well, I'm all googled out and I still haven't come up with anything
for VASI (although I have good data for PAPI.)  I guess I'll just have
to WAG it and assert that it came from FAA advisary circular
1234-567-ab until someone can prove me wrong. :-)

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Alex Perry

Have you checked the
* AIM description of the visual aid
* Airport construction recommendations
* TERPS description of approach/landing tolerances
... ?

> Well, I'm all googled out and I still haven't come up with anything
> for VASI (although I have good data for PAPI.)  I guess I'll just have
> to WAG it and assert that it came from FAA advisary circular
> 1234-567-ab until someone can prove me wrong. :-)

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Alex Perry writes:
> Have you checked the
> * AIM description of the visual aid
> * Airport construction recommendations

Yes, as far as a I know, although I'll never claim I've exhaustively
searched all FAA docs.

> * TERPS description of approach/landing tolerances

What is terps and where can I find it?

Thanks,

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Norman Vine


> Curtis L. Olson writes:
> 
>  > What I'm looking for is somethingn to the effect that a VASI light bar
>  > is a row of "n" lights spaced "x" meters apart.  VASI light bars are
>  > spaced "y" meters apart along the length of the runway.
>  > 
>  > And if I'm really lucky I'd get the difference in degrees in alignment
>  > between the two/three light bars.  I.e. bottom bar turns red at 3
>  > degrees, top bar turns red at 3.25 degrees (or something like that.)
> 
> These should all be governed by federal standards, and those standards
> should be online somewhere.

maybe this would help
http://www.faa.gov/aim/Chap2/aim0201.html#2-1-1


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Norman Vine writes:
> 
> > Curtis L. Olson writes:
> > 
> >  > What I'm looking for is somethingn to the effect that a VASI light bar
> >  > is a row of "n" lights spaced "x" meters apart.  VASI light bars are
> >  > spaced "y" meters apart along the length of the runway.
> >  > 
> >  > And if I'm really lucky I'd get the difference in degrees in alignment
> >  > between the two/three light bars.  I.e. bottom bar turns red at 3
> >  > degrees, top bar turns red at 3.25 degrees (or something like that.)
> > 
> > These should all be governed by federal standards, and those standards
> > should be online somewhere.
> 
> maybe this would help
> http://www.faa.gov/aim/Chap2/aim0201.html#2-1-1

That gives a good overview of how the VASI works from a pilot's
perspective, but it still doesn't show exactly how the vasi bars are
positioned relative the threshold, the runway edge and each other.
And it doesn't show details of the bar itself.  I assume a VASI bar is
a row of individual lights, but how many?  How far apart are the
individual lights in the bar placed?

Regards,

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Alex Perry

> > * TERPS description of approach/landing tolerances
> What is terps and where can I find it?

The US standard for TERminal instrument ProcedureS ...

http://www.terps.com/
http://av-info.faa.gov/terps/

Warning, for those on dialup, the actual TERMS manual is a HUGE PDF!

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Norman Vine

Curtis L. Olson writes
>
> Norman Vine writes:
> >
> > > Curtis L. Olson writes:
> > >
> > >  > What I'm looking for is somethingn to the effect that a VASI light
bar
> > >  > is a row of "n" lights spaced "x" meters apart.  VASI light bars
are
> > >  > spaced "y" meters apart along the length of the runway.
> > >  >
> > >  > And if I'm really lucky I'd get the difference in degrees in
alignment
> > >  > between the two/three light bars.  I.e. bottom bar turns red at 3
> > >  > degrees, top bar turns red at 3.25 degrees (or something like
that.)
> > >
> > > These should all be governed by federal standards, and those standards
> > > should be online somewhere.
> >
> > maybe this would help
> > http://www.faa.gov/aim/Chap2/aim0201.html#2-1-1
>
> That gives a good overview of how the VASI works from a pilot's
> perspective, but it still doesn't show exactly how the vasi bars are
> positioned relative the threshold, the runway edge and each other.
> And it doesn't show details of the bar itself.  I assume a VASI bar is
> a row of individual lights, but how many?  How far apart are the
> individual lights in the bar placed?

I am not sure that there is a 'regulation' that states this exactly
my reading of the above link indicates that things vary on an airport
by airport basis in that local conditions vary and it is the overall
'effect' of the lights and the 'pathway' they mark that is regulated

My reading of this australian document seems to confirm this
http://www.casa.gov.au/download/CAAPs/drome/89t_1.PDF

here is a link for aeronautical survey related documents
http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/AERO/aerospecs.htm#FAA405
< these are the surveys that must be made in order to get FAA
   approval for an airport >

there are photographs of several different 'conforming types'
linked at the bottom of this page

HTH

Norman


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Jim Wilson

"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> Norman Vine writes:
> > maybe this would help
> > http://www.faa.gov/aim/Chap2/aim0201.html#2-1-1
> 
> That gives a good overview of how the VASI works from a pilot's
> perspective, but it still doesn't show exactly how the vasi bars are
> positioned relative the threshold, the runway edge and each other.
> And it doesn't show details of the bar itself.  I assume a VASI bar is
> a row of individual lights, but how many?  How far apart are the
> individual lights in the bar placed?
> 

Take a look at Fig's 2-1-4 on that page for the various number of light
configurations.

There is a diagram with measurements on this page but it's pretty hard to read:
http://www.tpub.com/celec/20.htm 

The system they describe has 12 boxes, 3 lights in each box arranged in rows
of three boxes, two rows on each side of the runway.  I'd put them closer to
the runway and closer together than the papi system...I guess depending on the
size of the runway (and length of approaches).

Are you making these as 3D models?

Best,

Jim


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-07 Thread Norman Vine

Curtis L. Olson writes:

> Norman Vine writes:
> >
> > > Curtis L. Olson writes:
> > >
> > >  > What I'm looking for is somethingn to the effect that a VASI light
bar
> > >  > is a row of "n" lights spaced "x" meters apart.  VASI light bars
are
> > >  > spaced "y" meters apart along the length of the runway.
> > >  >
> > >  > And if I'm really lucky I'd get the difference in degrees in
alignment
> > >  > between the two/three light bars.  I.e. bottom bar turns red at 3
> > >  > degrees, top bar turns red at 3.25 degrees (or something like
that.)
> > >
> > > These should all be governed by federal standards, and those standards
> > > should be online somewhere.
> >
> > maybe this would help
> > http://www.faa.gov/aim/Chap2/aim0201.html#2-1-1
>
> That gives a good overview of how the VASI works from a pilot's
> perspective, but it still doesn't show exactly how the vasi bars are
> positioned relative the threshold, the runway edge and each other.
> And it doesn't show details of the bar itself.  I assume a VASI bar is
> a row of individual lights, but how many?  How far apart are the
> individual lights in the bar placed?

OK - Digging into my past,
the USACE has a Manual for building almost anything :-)

Publication Number: TM 5-811-5
Title: Army Aviation Lighting
Chapter2 - Airfield Runway and Approach Lighting Systems
http://www.usace.army.mil/publications/armytm/tm5-811-5/chap2.pdf

HTH

Norman



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-08 Thread Jim Brennan jjb -



A search for vasi lights on google turned up (among othr things)

http://www.bayareapilot.com/vasiPAPI.htm

Might be usefull.

jj



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-09 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Jim Wilson writes:
> Take a look at Fig's 2-1-4 on that page for the various number of light
> configurations.
> 
> There is a diagram with measurements on this page but it's pretty hard to read:
> http://www.tpub.com/celec/20.htm 
> 
> The system they describe has 12 boxes, 3 lights in each box arranged in rows
> of three boxes, two rows on each side of the runway.  I'd put them closer to
> the runway and closer together than the papi system...I guess depending on the
> size of the runway (and length of approaches).
> 
> Are you making these as 3D models?

Jim, the short answer is yes, I'm making these as a 3d model.  But I'm
doing it as part of the airport generation phase.

Regards,

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-09 Thread David Megginson

Curtis L. Olson writes:

 > Jim, the short answer is yes, I'm making these as a 3d model.  But I'm
 > doing it as part of the airport generation phase.

It would be nice if I could figure out how to do whatever you're doing
with a model animation; then we could place the VASIS and PAPI systems
using the regular 3D model manager, and add the default ones from
default.apt in one giant batch script.  That would also let us
custom-design unusual configurations.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-09 Thread Jim Wilson

David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> Curtis L. Olson writes:
> 
>  > Jim, the short answer is yes, I'm making these as a 3d model.  But I'm
>  > doing it as part of the airport generation phase.
> 
> It would be nice if I could figure out how to do whatever you're doing
> with a model animation; then we could place the VASIS and PAPI systems
> using the regular 3D model manager, and add the default ones from
> default.apt in one giant batch script.  That would also let us
> custom-design unusual configurations.
> 

How do they work in real life?  It seems that animation shouldn't be necessary.

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-09 Thread Curtis L. Olson

David Megginson writes:
> It would be nice if I could figure out how to do whatever you're doing
> with a model animation; then we could place the VASIS and PAPI systems
> using the regular 3D model manager, and add the default ones from
> default.apt in one giant batch script.  That would also let us
> custom-design unusual configurations.

The directional lighting is based on environment mapping so the input
you feed it is 'static', i.e. there's no animation.

You need a texture map that specified the light color relative to view
angle.  The direction a light is pointing (i.e. a normal.)  Plus a
slightly clever mechanism to draw a point that isn't visible from
behind.  (Which keeps us in the bounds of defined environment mapping
behavior.)

Then you turn on environment mapping/automatic texture coordinate
generate for drawing lights and set the polygon drawing mode to
GL_POINT to allow the one side point trick to work and draw the point.

The system automatically calculates a texture coordinate (or position
in the texture map) based on your view angle relative to the specified
normal.  If you are looking at the point dead in line with the normal,
you will get the center of the texture map.

It's a bit of work to get there, but is a nice effect in the end
... although vasi/papi is not working out as well as I had hoped.  It
could be I'm doing something wrong, or could be that there is
something I could do differntly to make it work correctly?  I might
punt on that for the moment.

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota  http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-09 Thread Andy Ross

Jim Wilson wrote:
> How do they work in real life?  It seems that animation shouldn't be
> necessary.

I got to see a 2-light PAPI up close at Fishers Island*, NY once.
It's an astonishingly simple device.  Basically, it's a box with a
bright white interior.  At one end is a lens.  At the other (on the
focal plane of the lens) is a white card painted red on the top and
white on the bottom.  Along the sides of the box are flourescent light
tubes.

   ++
Red#/\
   #   |  | Lens
   ~   |  |
Wht~\/
   +--  +
  ==light===

So when you look through the lens, you see a singularity image
(i.e. infinite magnification) of whatever you're looking at on the
back card.  If you're below the centerline, you see the red side.  If
you're above, you see the white.

The box is mounted on a pair of sturdy concrete poles, and is tilted
up at the glideslope angle.

Basically, Curt's approach seems exactly right.  The image of the
thing depends entirely on direction to the viewer.  There are no
moving parts at all.

Andy

* A really cute airport for anyone in the northeast.  Fishers Island
  is a tiny spot off the tip of Long Island, just south of New London,
  CT.  The demographic is similar to Martha's Vinyard or Nantucket --
  a small contingent of locals and a larger group of very wealthy
  vacation home owners.  My sister-in-law's parents were in the former
  group.  I got there on a ferry, not an airplane. :)

-- 
Andrew J. RossNextBus Information Systems
Senior Software Engineer  Emeryville, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.nextbus.com
"Men go crazy in conflagrations.  They only get better one by one."
 - Sting (misquoted)


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI

2002-10-09 Thread David Megginson

Jim Wilson writes:

 > > It would be nice if I could figure out how to do whatever you're doing
 > > with a model animation; then we could place the VASIS and PAPI systems
 > > using the regular 3D model manager, and add the default ones from
 > > default.apt in one giant batch script.  That would also let us
 > > custom-design unusual configurations.
 > > 
 > 
 > How do they work in real life?  It seems that animation shouldn't
 > be necessary.

Apologies -- by 'animation' I mean 'anything that's not in the 3D
file', including LOD and similar things.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI question

2003-12-01 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Hoyt A. Fleming writes:
> I was shooting an approach with FG and noticed that when I pitch up the
> aircraft, the VASI lights turn white.  Similarly, when I pitch down the
> aircraft, the VASI lights turn red.  I loaded the UFO and verified the VASI
> lights change color when the UFO is stationary and the pitch of the UFO
> varies.
> 
> Is this a known issue?

Yes, it's high on my todo list (along with about 300 other things.)

:-)

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org
Minnesota  http://www.flightgear.org/~curt  http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


RE: [Flightgear-devel] VASI question

2003-12-01 Thread Ryan Larson
Is that ToDo list published somewhere?

Ryan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Curtis L.
Olson
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:35 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] VASI question


Hoyt A. Fleming writes:
> I was shooting an approach with FG and noticed that when I pitch up the
> aircraft, the VASI lights turn white.  Similarly, when I pitch down the
> aircraft, the VASI lights turn red.  I loaded the UFO and verified the
VASI
> lights change color when the UFO is stationary and the pitch of the UFO
> varies.
>
> Is this a known issue?

Yes, it's high on my todo list (along with about 300 other things.)

:-)

Curt.
--
Curtis Olson   HumanFIRST Program   FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org
Minnesota  http://www.flightgear.org/~curt  http://www.flightgear.org

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] VASI lights in new sceenery

2004-06-17 Thread Josh Babcock
Curt,
I just noticed that one of the KADW 01L VASI lights is underground and 
invisible.  This is probably not the only instance, though it is the only on I 
have seen.  Perhaps there should be a strip of truly flat land wide enough to 
encompass the VASI and PAPI lights, and anything else that lives close to the 
ground next to runways for that matter.

Josh
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel