re: [Flightgear-devel] framerate 1/s

2002-03-22 Thread David Megginson

Melchior FRANZ writes:

 > The changes from yesterday turned my framerate at KSFO from about
 > 10 to 1 per second. Ten is already painful enough, and that with
 > clouds and panel turned off. But one is a bit weak and makes fgfs
 > virtually unflyable. (I've only got a 266MHz processor and a V3
 > graphics card.)

Which changes?  I don't think we did anything major yesterday.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



Re: [Flightgear-devel] framerate 1/s

2002-03-22 Thread Jim Wilson

Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> The changes from yesterday turned my framerate at KSFO from about
> 10 to 1 per second. Ten is already painful enough, and that with
> clouds and panel turned off. But one is a bit weak and makes fgfs
> virtually unflyable. (I've only got a 266MHz processor and a V3
> graphics card.)
> 
> m.

Are you using Linux?  I'm using a V3 but its on a 100mhz motherboard (750 mhz
processor) and I'm seeing an increase at KSFO.  It slowed down to 10 to 15 fps
a little while back and is now over 30.  Other airports with less stuff around
I'm much higher than that.  Check for something taking resources in the
background.

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel



[Flightgear-devel] framerate 1/s

2002-03-21 Thread Melchior FRANZ

The changes from yesterday turned my framerate at KSFO from about
10 to 1 per second. Ten is already painful enough, and that with
clouds and panel turned off. But one is a bit weak and makes fgfs
virtually unflyable. (I've only got a 266MHz processor and a V3
graphics card.)

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel