Re: [Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Harald JOHNSEN

Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:


I've tried out the recent c150 updates, and have observed the following
problems:

1) the speeds in the help file and on the specially crafted ASI seem
different from what the real Cessnas have. C150 was an inferior version to
a C152, with all the speeds lower, and same size tanks. Here's what a 1985
C152 book says:

108 rated BHP @ 2550 RPM
2x13gal tanks, 24.5 gal usable -- std tanks
2x19.5gal tanks, 37.5 gal usable -- long-range tanks
 


You are right, for some unknown reason to me I changed the tanks capacity.


max gross ramp weight (taxi) 1675lbs
MGTOW: 1670
MG landing weight: same

wing loading: 10.5 lbs/sq.ft
power loading: 15.5 lbs/hp

Speeds:
KCASKIAS
V_NE145 149
V_NO108 111
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
@1670   101 104
@1500   96  98
@1350   91  93
V_FE87  85

Hence the ASI markings are: white arc 35-85 Green: 40-111 Yellow: 111-149
and the red line is 149KIAS.

 

But the ASI markings and the help file gives MPH not knots. To be exact 
the asi

has primary markings in MPH and a secondary markings in Knots in the middle.


2) whenever I ask to reposition the aircraft,
fgfs sometime freezes with the splashscreen on, and sometimes reports a
crash as follows:

Position for KSFO is (-122.383, 37.621)
 Crash: Attempted to fly under ground.
Playing audio after 500.867 sec: intense ground contact

(this is in response to a 'location on the ground' command, 28R @ KSFO)

Sometimes at the same time I also see the aircraft tumbling backwards and
having its tail going underground, controls held neutral, tailwind never
exceeding 7  knots. Could this be that the model doesn't account for the
pilot's weight?

 

Yes I should add the pilot's weight, the aircraft is too light and can 
be blown away by very little

wind. You should disable metar /


3) in the cockpit view, I see strange speckles around the yokes, which
keep moving; you may get the idea by looking at a (still) image at
http://www.tarunz.org/~vassilii/Images/fg/c150-speckles.jpg

 

I don't know from where this comes. I've just made a check in 800x600 
but I can't see that
problem here. The texture used by the yoke is also used for the cabin 
interior, do you

have the problem only for the yoke ?

Harald.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Erik Hofman

Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:

I've tried out the recent c150 updates, and have observed the following
problems:


Here's the data for the C-150:
http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/docs/c150.txt

Erik


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
 You are right, for some unknown reason to me I changed the tanks capacity.

I wonder if this, along with the empty pilot seat, added to the
back-tumbling? BTW, Erik's data at
http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/docs/c150.txt also lists a std and
long-range configuration (please ignore my c152 data as his looks more
c150-specific and complete); maybe you could add a switch to select one
of the 2 to your configuration dialog?

It would need an update to the fuel gauges as well.

 Hence the ASI markings are: white arc 35-85 Green: 40-111 Yellow: 111-149
 and the red line is 149KIAS.
 
 
 
 But the ASI markings and the help file gives MPH not knots. To be exact
 the asi
 has primary markings in MPH and a secondary markings in Knots in the middle.

oops. Sorry about that! This explains another thing that puzzled me --
that at 60 KIAS it was on the verge of a stall, and that climb
performance was so different at 65 KIAS from what I expected :-)
actually these were much slower speeds than that...

 2) whenever I ask to reposition the aircraft,
 fgfs sometime freezes with the splashscreen on, and sometimes reports a
 crash as follows:
 
 Position for KSFO is (-122.383, 37.621)
   Crash: Attempted to fly under ground.
 Playing audio after 500.867 sec: intense ground contact
 
 (this is in response to a 'location on the ground' command, 28R @ KSFO)
 
 Sometimes at the same time I also see the aircraft tumbling backwards and
 having its tail going underground, controls held neutral, tailwind never
 exceeding 7  knots. Could this be that the model doesn't account for the
 pilot's weight?
 
 
 
 Yes I should add the pilot's weight, the aircraft is too light and can
 be blown away by very little
 wind. You should disable metar /

H even an empty aircraft doesn't get blown away that easy.
I can't believe it will be blown away by anything under 15 knots,
especially with the brakes engaged. Also, the behaviour described above
seems buggy anyhow --- why should anything become stuck?

 3) in the cockpit view, I see strange speckles around the yokes, which
 keep moving; you may get the idea by looking at a (still) image at
 http://www.tarunz.org/~vassilii/Images/fg/c150-speckles.jpg
 
 
 
 I don't know from where this comes. I've just made a check in 800x600
 but I can't see that
 problem here. The texture used by the yoke is also used for the cabin
 interior, do you
 have the problem only for the yoke ?

Yes. All the way to the yoke root, bvut not the grey axis. The
speckles seem to be consistent with the 10Hz timer in the .nas file.
If I pause the sim, they freeze, unless I try to rotate the view.

Another comment wrt the cessna is that, in the cold start scenario,
you seem to simulate its configuration after the shutdown checklist had
been run. However, this means that the carb heat is left off.

Also, you seem to have no hotspots on the master switch, which
makes it difficult to engage it (other than going to the property
manager).

Finally, even with the Master off, the ADF seems to be lit up.

Other than those, I haven't found any flaws. Great aircraft model,
and of special significance to me since I learned to fly in a 152.

V.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Dave Culp
 Sometimes at the same time I also see the aircraft tumbling backwards and
 having its tail going underground, controls held neutral, tailwind never
 exceeding 7  knots. Could this be that the model doesn't account for the
 pilot's weight?

Tumbling backwards is usually an indication that the airplane has failed to 
ground trim properly.   Maybe something has changed the presets ?

Dave

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d