Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: I have been wondering this for quite a while: will it be a good idea to provide weekly CVS snapshots? Do you mean replace the instant cvs snapshots with snapshots only taken at weekly intervals? :-) http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/source/source.tar.gz?tarball=1cvsroot=FlightGear-0.9 http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/data/data.tar.gz?tarball=1cvsroot=FlightGear-0.9 Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/ FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)
On October 5, 2005 07:58 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Do you mean replace the instant cvs snapshots with snapshots only taken at weekly intervals? :-) By cvs snapshots, I mean binary-snapshots packed into .deb, .rpm, etc. Ampere ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: On October 5, 2005 07:58 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote: Do you mean replace the instant cvs snapshots with snapshots only taken at weekly intervals? :-) By cvs snapshots, I mean binary-snapshots packed into .deb, .rpm, etc. If someone wants to do this, and promises to keep up on it, I can put a link on the FG web site ... Curt. -- Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/ FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)
On October 5, 2005 01:49 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: If someone wants to do this, and promises to keep up on it, I can put a link on the FG web site ... Curt. How should the version number progress? Should it be 0.9.9, 0.9.10, 0.9.11, etc. or 0.9.9.1, 0.9.9.2, 0.9.9.3, etc? Ampere ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: Curtis L. Olson wrote: Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: By cvs snapshots, I mean binary-snapshots packed into .deb, .rpm, etc. If someone wants to do this, and promises to keep up on it, I can put a link on the FG web site ... How should the version number progress? Should it be 0.9.9, 0.9.10, 0.9.11, etc. or 0.9.9.1, 0.9.9.2, 0.9.9.3, etc? Snapshot builds should generally be identified by their date. Alternatively, you can use a sequential build number, as is common with large commercial projects. But real version numbers typically indicate a distinct release, with a QA process, etc... Andy ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS Weekly Snapshot (was RFC: FlightGear 0.9.9)
Ampere K. Hardraade writes: On October 5, 2005 01:49 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote: If someone wants to do this, and promises to keep up on it, I can put a link on the FG web site ... Curt. How should the version number progress? Should it be 0.9.9, 0.9.10, 0.9.11, etc. or 0.9.9.1, 0.9.9.2, 0.9.9.3, etc? Surely one done today would be 0.9.8-20051005 Cheers - Dave ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
