Re: [Flightgear-devel] Built-in Svn client code crashing
On 4 Oct 2013, at 19:29, Markus Wanner wrote: > That smells like trouble from a packaging standpoint. It's usually not > acceptable, because most of the time, the integrated library isn't > getting the amount of support the original does. > > For Debian, I'll certainly have to consider reverting that change. Well, that might be quick tricky - the replacement code is a tiny subset of what the libsubversion code does, and behaves differently - which enables various features and different APIs which I'm planning to use going forwards. Just to be clear, I've replaced libsubversion, which is a full, read+write svn client library with support for history, logging, setting SVN properties and so on, with what is essentially a download engine which happens to speak the SVN protocol. (Which is the part of SVN we actually use). I haven't taken a copy of the libsubversion and forked/edited/trimmed it - it's completely unrelated code. Does that still cause problems under to policies described above? Regards, James -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Built-in Svn client code crashing
On 10/03/2013 01:45 PM, James Turner wrote: > Replaces it - one of the big motivations is that the libsvn dependency > is becoming increasingly complex to support. (Since libsvn depends on > APR, amongst other things) > > In Git now, all references to libsvn are gone - we always use the > built-in code That smells like trouble from a packaging standpoint. It's usually not acceptable, because most of the time, the integrated library isn't getting the amount of support the original does. For Debian, I'll certainly have to consider reverting that change. Regards Markus Wanner signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] --jpg-httpd command line option
Hi Rick, FWIIW, happened to be re-compiling the latest SG/FG git 2.99, and decided to add -DJPEG_FACTORY:BOOL=ON for a test, first to SG, and then to the FG compile... Was in Windows 7 64-bit, but only compiled the 32-bit version... but would not expect any particular extra problems to do it in 64-bits... Had to apply the following small patch to remove error of 'missing' Sleep(), to compile in windows - diff --git a/src/Network/jpg-httpd.cxx b/src/Network/jpg-httpd.cxx index 0c84f5b..e7a5679 100644 --- a/src/Network/jpg-httpd.cxx +++ b/src/Network/jpg-httpd.cxx @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ #include #include "jpg-httpd.hxx" +#ifdef WIN32 +#include // for Sleep(ms) function +#endif #define __MAX_HTTP_BLOCK_SIZE 4096 #define __MAX_STRING_SIZE 2048 And obviously it does require that cmake finds the JPEG includes and libraries... I had earlier compiled and installed jpeg-9 into my 3rdParty folder... This dependency would go away if OSGDB was used, as James mentioned, but then JPEG would probably have to be found during the OSG build, unless OSG has alternate built-in jpeg code... not sure... Thereafter, running fgfs.exe with --jpg-httpd=1234 worked fine by putting http://localhost:1234 is a browser, and bingo had a jpg image of the screen in the browser ;=)) cool stuff... Of course it is a 'static' image, and had to refresh to get updated images of the flight... or an extension added to provide an actual video feed as Curt mentioned... So I would say it worked as advertised ;=)) HTH. Regards, Geoff. On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 02:41 -0700, Rick Armstrong wrote: > Hello all, > I'm a developer using FlightGear in a simulation project for work, and > I'm currently getting imagery from FlightGear by triggering > screenshots from my application and loading the screen captures from > disk. It's kinda Rube Goldberg, but works well enough for a first > draft. What I'd /really/ like to do is stream the imagery directly to > my application. Googling around, I notice that there's a command-line > option to do exactly this! It's not enabled in v2.10, but some more > searching and I see that it can be enabled by setting > -DJPEG_FACTORY:BOOL=ON > in CMake. My question: before I go down that road, does anyone know if > the JPG HTTPD functionality works? If yes, does it work well? The fact > that it's turned-off by default makes me think that it might not be > ready for prime-time. > Any advice is greatly appreciated. > Regards, > Rick Armstrong > Portland, OR, USA > P.S. We're using Windows 7 VS 2010 and would be looking to build > 64-bit binaries. -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPS - merge request
Am Donnerstag, 3. Oktober 2013, 21:38:52 schrieb James Turner: > On 3 Oct 2013, at 17:35, Dirk Dittmann wrote: > > The improved-issue1164 is ready. > > > https://gitorious.org/fg/dirks-flightgear/source/778cc8c6a0abb88a1238850376ea2374358fd887: > Thanks, looks good and pushed. thx > > Unfortunately I now need to fix the route-path code to subdivide long legs > along the great-circle course, since currently the map shows a visible > difference at the midpoint of legs. But, that's a bug I'm glad to have :) i dont want to force you ;-) > > Kind regards, > James -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
