As another note, it seems that simgear and terragear from CVS have some problems -- using simgear-cs and terragear-cs from git seems to work better. Not sure what the -cs means or why we have two different repositories in the first place.
Jim On 5 May 2010 06:33, Jon S. Berndt <jonsber...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > This post will probably not be taken well by many subscribers but I > > understand your frustration. The build process works but to get the > > first clean compile is a highly non-trivial task as you noticed. Your > > post is not very descriptive so I can only give you general pointers. > > > > ... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jari > > I'd have to agree with all this. I stopped trying to build FlightGear years > ago because it is highly non-trivial. Having been involved in several large > engineering and training simulations over the years, I can say that in my > experience it's almost always non-trivial. :-) But, I think that if some > effort was expended, that process could be improved and made simpler or > more > automated for FlightGear. I'd like to see the build process formalized for > building under: > > 1) Linux > 2) Cygwin > 3) MSVC++ (using the latest Express compiler freely downloadable) > 4) Mac > > There ought to be some kind of install wizard for the source code, and an > interdependency checker, or similar. > > Jon > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
