I haven't gotten any answer from Martin.
Is there anybody having concern that these fix.dat.gz and nav.dat.gz to
be updated?
If no one has then I will push these files.
Let me know.
Thanks,
Hyde
(2012?11?07? 14:19), Hyde Yamakawa wrote:
Hello Martin,
I can not reach you by PM hence I send using mailing list as suggested
by Gijs.
1. I have the fix.dat.gz which reflects the latest AIS Japan data
https://aisjapan.mlit.go.jp/Login.doand was provided on Japan forum. I
already sent this to Robin to update but he is too busy to answer and
I haven't gotten any response yet.
2. I have the nav.dat.gz which I corrected all the GS antenna
elevation measuring actual touchdown point. Robin already corrected
some of them since I had reported that RJSF GS elevation is not
correct as following mail. And I notice that this change is not
applied FG yet.
Sent:March 31 2012
Hyde:
I apologise for the delay in replying, but we have been working on
enhancements to my database to support the new features of X-Plane
10. That
work is complete, so I am now processing the backlog of airport
updates.
I have corrected the elevation of the glideslopes. The FG team should
incorporate this to their database whenever they reload my data.
Thanks!
Robin Peel
Custodian of the X-Plane master database of airports and nav-aids
Visit the website at http://data.x-plane.com
ro...@xsquawkbox.net mailto:ro...@xsquawkbox.net
Seattle, Washington
-Original Message-
From: Hyde Yamakawa [mailto:h...@hyde-tech.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:26 AM
To: ro...@xsquawkbox.net mailto:ro...@xsquawkbox.net
Subject: GS antenna elevation data is incorrect in nav.dat
Hello, Robin,
At first, thank you for your dedication for these database
maintenance.
Now I have found some issues in nav.dat GS antenna elevation data.
GS antenna elevation data of RJSA, RJSC, RJSF and RJSK are all 54 feet
nevertheless other data are around 660, 330, 1220 and 310 for each.
This causes plane crash when I do ILS landing.
Then I checked all the RJ** airport data and found those data were not
accurate.
That's why the GS slope and PAPI indication has discrepancy.
I was a FFS maintainer once and this GS antenna elevation data was
a must be
adjusted data after delivery the simulator since the slope might be
different because of visual model accuracy.
Therefore this data may be differ between different simulator.
What do you think to keep accuracy of this data?
I'm currently the Flightgear user so Flightgear should have
independent
data?
Let me know your thought.
Best regards,
Hyde
My question is, can I push these files to GIT?
If not who should I ask?
I know they will be modified when V850 scenery will be delivered but
it will be next February or later.
Until that time can we use these my files?
And this also fixes the issue of
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bug ... start=100
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=630colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Summary%20Aircraft%20Milestonestart=100.
Regards,
Hyde
--
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center
Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues
Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
--
**
Hyde Yamakawa
308 Brookewood Dr.
Peachtree City, GA 30269
Phone (770)632-6461
Cell (404)353-8758
e-mail: h...@hyde-tech.com
http://www.hyde-tech.com/
**
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
