Re: [fltk.general] Continuous integration: using Jenkins fornightly FLTK builds

2012-04-21 Thread Greg Ercolano
Ya, I guess I'll try it with the next large checkin I do for Fl_Tree.

I haven't looked at the config; I assume an anon user can't just
do an SVN checkin of a spambot hidden in the Makefile so that doing
an svn checkin won't run their bot?

If you want, you can probably limit checkins to just us devs; you
can probably just assign us login names and passwords via direct email
to protect your build farm.

On 04/21/12 15:30, Fabien Costantini wrote:
> Wow matt, I just had a quick look to the recent builds/changes that's really 
> awesome !!!
> That is quickly going to be very useful,


___
fltk mailing list
fltk@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk


Re: [fltk.general] Continuous integration: using Jenkins fornightly FLTK builds

2012-04-21 Thread Matthias Melcher

On 22.04.2012, at 00:34, Greg Ercolano wrote:

> Ya, I guess I'll try it with the next large checkin I do for Fl_Tree.
> 
> I haven't looked at the config; I assume an anon user can't just
> do an SVN checkin of a spambot hidden in the Makefile so that doing
> an svn checkin won't run their bot?
> 
> If you want, you can probably limit checkins to just us devs; you
> can probably just assign us login names and passwords via direct email
> to protect your build farm.

It uses the svn repo on fltk.org. So, yes, you are right, fudging the Makefile 
would be quite harmful :-(

___
fltk mailing list
fltk@easysw.com
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk