Re: FLUXLIST: rere vote, links for everyone

2001-05-27 Thread Deborah

At 03:38 PM 5/27/01 -0500, jason pierce wrote:
>that brings up another thing if somebody
>wants to publicly post their poetry they
>should expect a little negative criticism.
>it kind of goes with the territory.

Saying someone's work shouldn't be posted, when they happen to be prolific, 
is not critiquing. It's an attempt at censorship.

Deborah




FLUXLIST: rere vote, links for everyone

2001-05-27 Thread jason pierce

that brings up another thing if somebody
wants to publicly post their poetry they
should expect a little negative criticism.
it kind of goes with the territory.

why post it to be "left alone"? that is the worst
crime in the art world is people "leaving things alone".
that is how things get better, by critical dialogue.
which i must note is what poetry itself is opposed to
or at least the majority of "poets". that's why most poetry
is so bad, it's opposition to critical dialogue. i tend to
agree with Bahktin on that issue.

if only my "Blockade tournament" had gotten this much
negative feedback. (sniff sniff)

jason


At 5:45 AM -0700 5/27/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
>If one does, everyone ought to. I agree.
>
>And, it's possibly the silliest thing I've read in a long time.
>
>I want to hurry this post along so that it will make it into tomorrow's
>digest which will be, for the most part, empty bickering (me included)
>about something that is terminally ludicrous.
>
>Why not just let the man post his poems and go in peace?!?! Life is so
>damned short...
>
>Deborah .. who will honor you all by saying no more about the subject.