RE: FLUXLIST: nada

2006-04-19 Thread bibiana padilla maltos


http://www.nada.com/


Original Message Follows
From: mIEKAL aND [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: FLUXLIST: nada
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:21:05 -0500

http://nothing.com/





Re: FLUXLIST: nada

2006-04-19 Thread Kamen Nedev
On the other hand, zero is a number, not nothing. Thus we get the  
following result:


http://www.0.com

But some people don't agree, and assume that 0=nothing, as in here:

http://www.zero.com/

How we understand the number 0 is also culturally-specific:

http://www.cero.com

See, that's why I like nothing. Nothing is simple. There's no  
ambiguity in nothing, nothing confusing in nothing. Nothing is nothing.


(Or Nothing is, as Sun Ra would have it.)

K

On 19/04/2006, at 22:51, bibiana padilla maltos wrote:



http://www.nada.com/


Original Message Follows
From: mIEKAL aND [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: FLUXLIST: nada
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:21:05 -0500

http://nothing.com/








Kamen Nedev
c/Pelayo Nº38, 5º Izda.
28004 Madrid
España

(+34) 649 77 80 37
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://emitmedia.blogspot.com
http://emit-es.blogspot.com
http://emit.omweb.com






RE: FLUXLIST: nada

2006-04-19 Thread Allan Revich
Wow. A chief economist ...and everything.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of bibiana padilla maltos
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 4:52 PM
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: RE: FLUXLIST: nada


http://www.nada.com/


Original Message Follows
From: mIEKAL aND [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: FLUXLIST: nada
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:21:05 -0500

http://nothing.com/