Re: [fonc] Electrical Actors?

2011-06-06 Thread David Barbour
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Casey Ransberger
wrote:
>
> Has anyone taken the actor model down to the metal?
>

This would be difficult. We are constrained by fixed memory resources and
connectivity relationships at the hardware level. The memory limits
constrain scheduling in ways that may conflict with progress in the Actors
model. The limited hardware connectivity means we cannot arbitrarily share
references as first-class between actors.


> Another thought I had was using some nice symmetry that would let the
> processor do more than one thing at once. Of course if I shipped a
> microprocessor that had weird deadlock issues, I'd be inclined to call it a
> lemon.


If you are not fixated on actors, I suggest you pursue other concurrency
models: synchronous dataflow (Lustre, Estrel), Kahn process networks,
clockless logic (e.g. Karl Font), event calculus, FRP, RDP, et cetera.
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc


Re: [fonc] Electrical Actors?

2011-06-06 Thread BGB

On 6/6/2011 11:53 AM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote:

Casey,


Has anyone taken the actor model down to the metal?

I studied this in detail back in 1990 and had several references. These
are physically hard for me to reach right now and probably are not easy
to find on the web.

Though not an actor model, you might find my "RNA" idea of objects and
messages at the transistor level interesting:

http://www.merlintec.com:8080/hardware/19

This text is mostly just a note to myself and probably doesn't make much
sense to other people. An animation of the idea, however, would probably
be easily understood even by children (and probably more easily by
biologists than computer "scientists", hence the forced acronym from
Ring Network Architecture). I plan to work on this next year.


hmm, computer scientists can be scientists.

they just need a lab coat, some dark goggles, and to randomly interject 
"Science!" and "for Science!" into random/unrelated conversations.


and maybe somehow make a modern computer store data on a near by 
reel-to-real tape, or build robots or something.


programmers already use testing and similar though (like making tests 
and testing things).


ok, yes, this was sort of a lame joke...


or such...


___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc


Re: [fonc] Electrical Actors?

2011-06-06 Thread Jecel Assumpcao Jr.
Casey,

> Has anyone taken the actor model down to the metal?

I studied this in detail back in 1990 and had several references. These
are physically hard for me to reach right now and probably are not easy
to find on the web.

Though not an actor model, you might find my "RNA" idea of objects and
messages at the transistor level interesting:

http://www.merlintec.com:8080/hardware/19

This text is mostly just a note to myself and probably doesn't make much
sense to other people. An animation of the idea, however, would probably
be easily understood even by children (and probably more easily by
biologists than computer "scientists", hence the forced acronym from
Ring Network Architecture). I plan to work on this next year.

-- Jecel


___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc


[fonc] Electrical Actors?

2011-06-05 Thread Casey Ransberger
So I'm stumbling along happily playing with various ideas to do with minimal 
microprocessor design (thanks for all of the wonderful pointers everyone) and 
invariably my mind wanders from time to time to what I'd need to do to make it 
fast. 

I could try representing netlists as s-exprs and letting natures own search 
engine look for faster variations of my  design, but I worry that I might end 
up with something nightmarishly complex at the end of that slog. 

Another thought I had was using some nice symmetry that would let the processor 
do more than one thing at once. Of course if I shipped a microprocessor that 
had weird deadlock issues, I'd be inclined to call it a lemon. 

I know processors are usually concurrent in one way or another nowadays (and I 
recognize my own naïveté wrt the field, so please forgive) and I was wondering:

Has anyone taken the actor model down to the metal?
___
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc